Baclofen suppression of cocaine self-administration: demonstration using a discrete trials procedure

1997 ◽  
Vol 131 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. S. Roberts ◽  
Monique M. Andrews
2006 ◽  
Vol 185 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara J. Ward ◽  
Christopher Läck ◽  
Drake Morgan ◽  
David C. S. Roberts

1977 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Stretch ◽  
Gary J. Gerber

Responding for intravenous injections of morphine was studied using a discrete-trials procedure in squirrel monkeys. For one group, each session consisted of 10 trials at an inter-trial interval of 15 min; for the second group, each session consisted of 100 trials at an inter-trial interval of 1.5 min. When different injection doses of morphine (1–1000 μg/kg per injection), including saline as a control procedure, were substituted at random for blocks of five consecutive sessions, the frequency of morphine self-administration was found to be an inverted U-shaped function of the injection dose. This relationship was observed in each group of monkeys, despite a 10-fold difference in the total amount of the drug which was available for self-administration per session when a given injection dose was substituted for both groups. The results show that the injection dose of morphine acted as a primary determinant of response probability, even under circumstances in which trial spacing imposed a significant delay between consecutive opportunities for drug self-administration.


1977 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 778-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Stretch

Intravenous cocaine self-injection behaviour was studied using a new discrete-trials procedure in monkeys. Daily sessions consisted of two sets of 40 discrete trials, separated by a 5-min time out (TO) period; the intertrial interval during each segment of the session was equal to 50 s. In the first experiment, cocaine self-injection behaviour (15 μg/kg per injection) was suppressed in a dose-dependent manner by morphine pretreatment (1–5.6 mg/kg, im). When cocaine self-injection responding was suppressed by morphine pretreatment (3 or 5.6 mg/kg, im), the morphine antagonist, naloxone (0.01–1.0 mg/kg, im), reinstated drug-taking behaviour; the effect depended upon the dose of the antagonist and upon the amount of morphine given to suppress cocaine self-administration behaviour. When monkeys were pretreated with chlorpromazine (0.03–5.6 mg/kg, im) before a cocaine self-injection session, small doses marginally increased responding and larger doses exerted a suppressive effect. These effects were observed when cocaine was available at a unit dose of 15 μg/kg per injection. When the unit dose of cocaine was increased to 300 μg/kg per injection, small doses of chlorpromazine (0.03–1 mg/kg, im) exerted no clearly detectable effects, though responding for drug injections was profoundly suppressed when sessions were preceded by chlorpromazine pretreatment at doses of 3 and 5.6 mg/kg, im. In this experiment, drug intake per session was greater when a large injection dose (300 μg/kg per injection) was available for self-administration than when a small dose (15 μg/kg per injection) could be self-injected; the frequency of drug self-injection was reduced, however, when the larger unit dose of cocaine replaced the smaller one. When considered in relation to the results of other experiments, it is evident that control of cocaine self-injection responding by a discrete-trials procedure results in schedule-dependent behaviours that differ in relative sensitivity to drug pretreatments from cocaine-reinforced responding controlled by fixed-ratio schedules of drug reinforcement.


2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C.S Roberts ◽  
Karen Brebner ◽  
Michelle Vincler ◽  
Wendy J Lynch

1977 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 615-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Stretch

Intravenous morphine self-injection behaviour was studied using a new discrete-trials procedure in monkeys. Morphine self-injection was most probable when small unit doses (10–100 μg/kg per injection) were available and least frequent, even in comparison with saline substitution, at doses of 300 and 400 μg/kg per injection. Despite variation of the inter-trial interval from 50 to 300 s small injection doses (25 and 100 μg/kg per injection) continued to sustain more frequent self-injection responding than a larger unit dose (400 μg/kg per injection). When daily sessions consisted of 40 trials at an inter-trial interval of 50 s, morphine self-injection behaviour (100 μg/kg per injection) was neither increased nor consistently decreased by naloxone pretreatment (0.1–1.0 mg/kg im). In subsequent experiments, daily sessions consisted of two sets of 40 discrete trials, separated by a time-out (TO) period. When monkeys were pretreated with morphine (5.6 mg/kg im) before a given session, responding for drug injections was suppressed; the effect was reversed by naloxone (1 mg/kg im) which, if injected at TO, reinstated morphine self-administration behaviour. When an injection of chlorpromazine (5.6 mg/kg im) preceded a given session, responding for morphine injections was also suppressed; naloxone (1 mg/kg im) failed to reinstate chlorpromazine-suppressed responding, indicating that naloxone acted as an acute morphine antagonist under some circumstances, but did not otherwise influence behaviour. When the unit dose of morphine was increased to 200 μg/kg per injection, naloxone (1–3 mg/kg im) elicited agitation and occasional vomiting in each monkey tested, but did not suppress their drug-taking behaviour. Though small increases in morphine intake were observed after naloxone pretreatment, substantial increases in response output during the inter-trial interval, with a consequent loss of stimulus control normally exerted by the trial signal, were observed. These results were interpreted in terms of acute, antagonist-precipitated withdrawal signs, not evident in response to naloxone pretreatment when drug self-injection responding was maintained on a daily basis by a limited number of smaller unit injection doses of morphine (50 or 100 μg/kg per injection).


Methodology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Gerich ◽  
Roland Lehner

Although ego-centered network data provide information that is limited in various ways as compared with full network data, an ego-centered design can be used without the need for a priori and researcher-defined network borders. Moreover, ego-centered network data can be obtained with traditional survey methods. However, due to the dynamic structure of the questionnaires involved, a great effort is required on the part of either respondents (with self-administration) or interviewers (with face-to-face interviews). As an alternative, we will show the advantages of using CASI (computer-assisted self-administered interview) methods for the collection of ego-centered network data as applied in a study on the role of social networks in substance use among college students.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document