A prospective randomized comparison of conventional mechanical ventilation and very early high frequency oscillatory ventilation in extremely premature newborns with respiratory distress syndrome

1999 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Plavka ◽  
P. Kopecký ◽  
V. Sebroň ◽  
P. Švihovec ◽  
B. Zlatohlávková ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Conventional Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation ◽  
Premature Newborns ◽  
Oscillatory Ventilation ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory

Frühgeborene: Nasale Hochfrequenz-Oszillationsbeatmung vs. nasaler CPAP

2021 ◽  
Vol 225 (05) ◽  
pp. 389-390
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation ◽  
Oscillatory Ventilation ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory

Viele Frühgeborene mit einem Atemnotsyndrom (engl. Respiratory Distress Syndrome, RDS) erhalten zunächst eine nicht invasive Atemunterstützung. Ein chinesisches Forscherteam untersuchte nun, welche Methode besser vor einem invasiven mechanischen Beatmungsbedarf schützte: Der nasale CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) oder die nasale HFOV (High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document