The interspecific genome structure of cultivated banana, Musa spp. revealed by genomic DNA in situ hybridization

2000 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D’Hont ◽  
A. Paget-Goy ◽  
J. Escoute ◽  
F. Carreel
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Genome Structure ◽  
Musa Spp

C-banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization studies of the wheat–alien hybrid 'Agrotana'

Genome ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 477-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Xu ◽  
R. L. Conner ◽  
A. Laroche
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Chromosome Engineering ◽  
C Banding ◽  
Chinese Spring Wheat ◽  
Mother Cells ◽  
Alien Chromatin ◽  
Chromosome Segments

'Agrotana', a wheat-alien hybrid (2n = 56), is a potential source of resistance to common root rot, stem rust, wheat streak mosaic virus, and the wheat curl mite. However, the origin of 'Agrotana', reported to be durum wheat × Agropyron trichophorum (pubescent wheatgrass), is uncertain. The objective of this investigation was to determine the chromosome constitution of 'Agrotana' using C-banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques. The F1 hybrid of 'Agrotana' × 'Chinese Spring' wheat showed 7 I + 21 II in 14.9% of the pollen mother cells, evidence of the presence of the A, B, and D genomes in 'Agrotana'. The hybrid had 16 heavily C-banded chromosomes, namely 4A, and 1-7B of wheat, and a translocation that probably involved wheat chromosomes 2A and 2D. In situ hybridization using biotinylated genomic DNA of Ag. trichophorum cv. Greenleaf blocked with CS DNA failed to identify the alien chromosomes in 'Agrotana', indicating that the alien chromosomes were not likely derived from pubescent wheatgrass. In situ hybridization using labelled wheat genomic DNA blocked with 'Agrotana' DNA revealed that 'Agrotana' had 40 wheat, 14 alien, and 2 (a pair) wheat–alien translocated chromosomes. There was no homology between wheat and the alien chromosomes or chromosome segments involved in the wheat–alien recombinant. Two of the seven pairs of alien chromosomes were homoeologous to each other. The ability to identify alien chromatin in wheat using labelled wheat DNA instead of labelled alien DNA will be particularly useful in chromosome engineering of wheat germplasms having alien chromatin of unknown origin.Key words: wheat–alien hybrid, C-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization, labelled wheat DNA as probe.

A rapid procedure for the isolation of C0t-1 DNA from plants

Genome ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Zwick ◽  
Robert E. Hanson ◽  
M. Nurul Islam-Faridi ◽  
David M. Stelly ◽  
Rod A. Wing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Repetitive Dna ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Mammalian Species ◽  
Repetitive Dnas ◽  
Rapid Procedure ◽  
Dna Elements ◽  
Repetitive Dna Elements

In situ hybridization (ISH) for the detection of single- or low-copy sequences, particularly large DNA fragments cloned into YAC or BAC vectors, generally requires the suppression or "blocking" of highly-repetitive DNAs. C0t-1 DNA is enriched for repetitive DNA elements, high or moderate in copy number, and can therefore be used more effectively than total genomic DNA to prehybridize and competitively hybridize repetitive elements that would otherwise cause nonspecific hybridization. C0t-1 DNAs from several mammalian species are commercially available, however, none is currently available for plants to the best of our knowledge. We have developed a simple 1-day procedure to generate C0t-1 DNA without the use of specialized equipment.Key words: C0t-1 DNA, in situ hybridization, BACs, plants.

Genomic in situ hybridization to sectioned nuclei shows chromosome domains in grass hybrids

1990 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-341
Author(s):  
A.R. Leitch ◽  
W. Mosgoller ◽  
T. Schwarzacher ◽  
M.D. Bennett ◽  
J.S. Heslop-Harrison
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Microscope Level ◽  
Hordeum Chilense ◽  
Root Tip ◽  
Interphase Nuclei ◽  
Light Microscope Level ◽  
Thin Sections ◽  
Electron Microscopes

In situ hybridization using biotinylated total genomic DNA and avidin detection systems was adapted for examination of thin-sectioned plant material in the light and electron microscopes. Root tip material was preserved prior to sectioning, so that the in vivo disposition of the chromatin was maintained. Use of total genomic DNA from Secale africanum as a probe enabled the chromatin from the two parental genomes in the grass hybrid Hordeum chilense × S. africanum to be distinguished. The biotinylated probe preferentially labelled the chromosomes of S. africanum origin. DNA-DNA hybrids were visualized at the light-microscope level by Texas Red fluorescence and at the electron-microscope level by the enzymic precipitation of DAB (diaminobenzidine) or by colloidal gold particles. The use of thin sections allowed the location of probe hybridization to be established unequivocally in both metaphase and interphase nuclei. Analysis of interphase nuclei showed that chromatin originating from the two parental genomes did not intermix but occupied distinct domains.

scholarly journals Comparison Between Integrated Genomic DNA/RNA Profiling and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in the Detection of MYC, BCL-2, and BCL-6 Gene Rearrangements in Large B-Cell Lymphomas

2019 ◽  
Vol 153 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel P Cassidy ◽  
Jennifer R Chapman ◽  
Rafael Lopez ◽  
Kyle White ◽  
Yao-Shan Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Gene Rearrangements ◽  
B Cell Lymphomas ◽  
Rna Profiling ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Objectives To compare fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and a commercially available sequencing assay for comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to determine the best approach to identify gene rearrangements (GRs) in large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs). Methods Comparison of standard-of-care FISH assays (including a two-probe approach for MYC; break-apart and fusion probes) and an integrated genomic DNA/RNA sequencing CGP approach on a set of 69 consecutive LBCL cases. Results CGP detected GRs, including those involving MYC (1), BCL-2 (3), and BCL-6 (3), not detected by FISH. FISH detected non–IgH-MYC (4) and BCL-6 (2) GRs that were not detected by CGP. In four instances, standalone CGP or FISH testing would have missed a double-hit lymphoma. Conclusions CGP was superior to FISH in the detection of IgH-MYC rearrangements but was inferior for the detection of non–IgH-MYC rearrangements. Our study demonstrates the rationale for development of a customized approach to identify GRs in LBCLs.

Relationships among 3 Kochia species based on PCR-generated molecular sequences and molecular cytogenetics

Genome ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 1104-1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
B S Lee ◽  
M Y Kim ◽  
R R.-C Wang ◽  
B L Waldron
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Rapd Markers ◽  
Random Amplified Polymorphic Dna ◽  
5S Rdna ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cross Hybridization ◽  
Forage Kochia

Forage kochia (Kochia prostrata ssp. virescens 'Immigrant' is native to the arid and semiarid regions of central Eurasia. It was introduced into the United States in 1966 as PI 314929 and released as a perennial forage shrub in 1984. Kochia americana is a perennial native to the United States, whereas Kochia scorparia is an introduced annual species that became a weed. To assess both the breeding potential and the possibility of genetic contamination, relationships among the 3 Kochia species were analyzed using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers, sequence tagged site (STS) marker sequences of the chloroplast NADH dehydrogenase gene (ndhF), genomic in situ hybridization (GISH), and multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (MC-FISH). Seventy decamer random primers yielded 458 polymorphic bands from 9 plants of K. americana, 20 plants of K. prostrata, and 7 plants of K. scoparia. Fifty-four and 55 species-specific RAPD markers were identified for K. americana and K. prostrata, whereas 80 RAPD markers were specific to K. scoparia. Based on the presence or absence of informative RAPD markers, the 3 species always grouped into 3 distinct clusters in a NTSYSpc2.01b-generated dendrogram. The same relationships were found among the 3 Kochia species based on ndhF DNA sequence divergence. Using a set of 7 STS markers that can identify each Kochia species, we did not find a single interspecific hybrid from artificial hybridizations among the 3 Kochia species. In GISH studies, chromosomes of 1 species fluoresced in green only when they were probed by genomic DNA of the same species. Cross-hybridization by genomic DNA of another species was not observed. In FISH studies using pTa71 (for 18S–5.8S–26S rDNAs) and pScT7 (for 5S rDNA) as probes, there were 1, 1 and 3 pTa71 sites and 2, 1, and 1 pScT7 sites in each haplome of K. prostrata, K. americana, and K. scoparia, respectively. It is concluded that these 3 Kochia species are so genomically distinct that gene introgression among them would be extremely rare.Key words: RAPD, STS, ndhF, GISH, FISH, mixoploidy, forage kochia.

Genome discrimination by in situ hybridization in Icelandic species of Elymus and Elytrigia (Poaceae: Triticeae)

Genome ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian Ørgaard ◽  
Kesara Anamthawat-Jónsson
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Genomic In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Pseudoroegneria Spicata ◽  
Genome Constitution ◽  
Elytrigia Repens ◽  
Elymus Caninus ◽  
Elymus Species

The genome constitution of Icelandic Elymus caninus, E. alaskanus, and Elytrigia repens was examined by fluorescence in situ hybridization using genomic DNA and selected cloned sequences as probes. Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) of Hordeum brachyantherum ssp. californicum (diploid, H genome) probe confirmed the presence of an H genome in the two tetraploid Elymus species and identified its presence in the hexaploid Elytrigia repens. The H chromosomes were painted uniformly except for some chromosomes of Elytrigia repens which showed extended unlabelled pericentromeric and subterminal regions. A mixture of genomic DNA from H. marinum ssp. marinum (diploid,Xa genome) and H. murinum ssp. leporinum (tetraploid,Xu genome) did not hybridize to chromosomes of the Elymus species or Elytrigia repens, confirming that these genomes were different from the H genome. The St genomic probe from Pseudoroegneria spicata (diploid) did not discriminate between the genomes of the Elymus species, whereas it produced dispersed and spotty hybridization signals most likely on the two St genomes of Elytrigia repens. Chromosomes of the two genera Elymus and Elytrigia showed different patterns of hybridization with clones pTa71 and pAes41, while clones pTa1 and pSc119.2 hybridized only to Elytrigia chromosomes. Based on FISH with these genomic and cloned probes, the two Elymus species are genomically similar, but they are evidently different from Elytrigia repens. Therefore the genomes of Icelandic Elymus caninus and E. alaskanus remain as StH, whereas the genomes of Elytrigia repens are proposed as XXH.Key words: Elymus, Elytrigia, H genome, St genome, in situ hybridization.

Molecular cytogenetic analysis of durum wheat × tritordeum hybrids

Genome ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 362-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Lima-Brito ◽  
H. Guedes-Pinto ◽  
G. E. Harrison ◽  
J. S. Heslop-Harrison
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Plant Breeding ◽  
Durum Wheat ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Tandem Repeats ◽  
Nuclear Architecture ◽  
Molecular Cytogenetics ◽  
Hordeum Chilense

Southern and in situ hybridization were used to examine the chromosome constitution, genomic relationships, repetitive DNA sequences, and nuclear architecture in durum wheat × tritordeum hybrids (2n = 5x = 35), where tritordeum is the fertile amphiploid (2n = 6x = 42) between Hordeum chilense and durum wheat. Using in situ hybridization, H. chilense total genomic DNA hybridized strongly to the H. chilense chromosomes and weakly to the wheat chromosomes, which showed some strongly labelled bands. pHcKB6, a cloned repetitive sequence isolated from H. chilense, enabled the unequivocal identification of each H. chilense chromosome at metaphase. Analysis of chromosome disposition in prophase nuclei, using the same probes, showed that the chromosomes of H. chilense origin were in individual domains with only limited intermixing with chromosomes of wheat origin. Six major sites of 18S–26S rDNA genes were detected on the chromosomes of the hybrids. Hybridization to Southern transfers of restriction enzyme digests using genomic DNA showed some variants of tandem repeats, perhaps owing to methylation. Both techniques gave complementary information, extending that available from phenotypic, chromosome morphology, or isozyme analysis, and perhaps are useful for following chromosomes or chromosome segments during further crossing of the lines in plant breeding programs.Key words: In situ hybridization, molecular cytogenetics, plant breeding, Hordeum chilense, Southern hybridization, durum wheat, hybrids.

Detection of barley chromatin added to wheat by genomic in situ hybridization

Genome ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 448-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Mukai ◽  
B. S. Gill
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Repeat Sequence ◽  
Genomic Clone ◽  
Genomic In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Addition Lines ◽  
Interphase Nuclei ◽  
Nucleolar Organizing Region ◽  
Chromosome Domains

A technique for in situ hybridization is reported that can be used to detect barley chromatin in wheat background using total genomic DNA as a probe. A 1:2 ratio of biotin-labeled genomic DNA of barley to blocking (unlabeled, sheared) DNA of wheat was sufficient to reveal brownish labeled barley chromosome domains against bluish background of unlabeled wheat chromatin in metaphase, prophase, and interphase nuclei of wheat-barley addition lines. Using this procedure, the behavior of specific barley chromosomes was analyzed in interphase and prophase cells. In prophase cells, the 6H chromosome was always associated with a nucleolus. A genomic clone of α-amylase gene (gRAmy56) that contains a barley-specific dispersed repeat sequence was also used to detect barley chromosomes in a wheat background.Key words: Hordeum vulgare, Triticum aestivum, genomic in situ hybridization, biotin, nucleolar organizing region.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document