Endoscopic controlled splitting of the diaphragm. A minimal invasive approach for the treatment of thoraco-lumbar fractures of the spine

1998 ◽  
Vol 101 (8) ◽  
pp. 619-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Beisse ◽  
M. Potulski ◽  
C. Temme ◽  
V. Bühren
Keyword(s):  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Minimal Invasive Approach ◽  
Fractures Of The Spine ◽  
Lumbar Fractures

Which is the Best Minimal Invasive Approach for the Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax? Uniport, Two, or Three Ports: A Prospective Randomized Trail

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (07) ◽  
pp. 589-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celalettin Kocaturk ◽  
Hasan Akin ◽  
Sertan Erdogan ◽  
Salih Bilen ◽  
Kemal Karapinar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spontaneous Pneumothorax ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Minimal Invasive Approach ◽  
Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Objective Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become the standard treatment method for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Concerns about lesser pain and better cosmesis led to the evolution of uniportal access. This study prospectively compared the results of the uniportal, two-port, and three-port thoracoscopic surgery. Material and Methods One hundred and thirty-five patients were randomized into three groups according to the port numbers. The groups were compared regarding the operation time, hospital stay, amount of drainage, area of pleurectomy, complications, recurrences, and pain scores. Results Except for the amount of drainage (p = 0.03), no factors were found to be statistically significant. The overall recurrence rate was 5%. Although the first and second week pain scores were not statistically significant, the single-incision group patients had significantly less pain at 4, 24, and 72 hours (p < 0.05). Conclusion The study indicated that uniportal VATS approach is less painful and has better cosmetic results, besides it is as efficient as two- or three-port VATS approach.

A New Minimal Approach in Cochlear Implant Surgery: The Colombian Experience

2005 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Almario ◽  
Jose G. Lora ◽  
Jose A. Prieto
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Implant Surgery ◽  
Minimal Invasive Approach ◽  
Cochlear Implant Surgery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Age Range

OBJECTIVES: To implement a minimal invasive approach in cochlear implant surgery for children and adults. In order to decrease surgical complications and morbidity with the surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: During a 1-year period, 12 consecutive patients (5 female and 7 male; age range, 1.5 to 78 years; mean age, 14.5 years), who had cochlear implantation (1 Nucleus and 11 Clarion) through a new surgical approach, were prospectively evaluated. RESULTS: The surgical approach was accomplished in all the patients with no major complications. The mean surgical time was 3.2 hours and the mean time between surgery and process of programming was 2.7 weeks. CONCLUSION: The surgical trauma and postoperatory edema was decreased and allowed programming of the implant in a shorter period of time.

A successful outcome using a minimal invasive approach to manage a severe trauma to the primary maxillary incisor in a toddler

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Senda Charone ◽  
Erika Calvano Kuchler ◽  
Marcelo De Castro Costa ◽  
Lucianne Cople Maia
Keyword(s):  
Severe Trauma ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Successful Outcome ◽  
Maxillary Incisor ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Minimal Invasive Approach
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document