Intraoperative ultrasonography in thoracolumbar fractures with intraspinal bone fragments. Evaluation of canalar stenosis and anatomic check of decompression: comparative study with the CT-scan

1998 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 353-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-Y. Lazennec ◽  
G. Saillant ◽  
S. Ramare ◽  
S. Hansen
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (13) ◽  
pp. 1056-1061
Author(s):  
Sushanta Kumar Das ◽  
Saket Saurabh ◽  
Niranjan Sahoo ◽  
Sanjeeb Kumar Pradhan ◽  
Pranab Kumar Prusty ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 67 (9) ◽  
pp. S615
Author(s):  
Masashi Inui ◽  
Kazunari Tanabe ◽  
Marcian A. Manu ◽  
Tadahiko Tokumoto ◽  
Nobuo Ishikawa ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan Shi ◽  
Si Chen ◽  
Xue Chen ◽  
Pan Xue

Aim. To study the diagnostic effect of hip fracture in the elderly. In this paper, a total of 100 elderly patients with hip fracture from January 2020 to May 2021 were selected for X-ray and CT examination after admission. The operation was taken as the final criteria for determining hip fracture type, and the diagnosis of hip fracture by CT three-dimensional reconstruction was analyzed and studied. The results showed that the diagnostic rate of CT 3D reconstruction for various types of hip fracture in the elderly was higher than that of CT plain scan and X-ray ( P < 0.05 ). For the diagnosis of intra-articular small bone fragments, the rate of missed diagnosis was 2% (2/100) with CT 3D reconstruction, 10% (10/100) with conventional CT scan, and 20% (20/100) with X-ray. The rate of misdiagnosis was 5.0% (5/100) with CT 3D reconstruction. Routine CT scan was 15% (15/100), X-ray was 30% (30/100), and CT 3D reconstruction was significantly lower than other examinations ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. CT 3D reconstruction has high accuracy in the diagnosis of various types of hip fractures in the elderly.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-129
Author(s):  
Anupama Maheswaran ◽  
Siddharth N. Aiyer ◽  
Osama Farouk ◽  
Mohammad El-Sharkawi ◽  
Jong-Beom Park ◽  
...  

Study Design: A multicenter, pilot study, for radiological assessment of thoracolumbar spine fractures was performed with the participation of 7 centers in Africa, Europe, Asia, and South America as a part of the AO Foundation network. Objectives: To determine the interobserver variability for computed tomography (CT) scan–based evaluation of posterior ligament complex (PLC) injury in thoracolumbar fractures. Methods: Forty-two observers including 1 principal investigator at each participating center performed variability assessment. Each center contributed toward a total of 91 patient images with A3 or A4 thoracolumbar burst fractures (T11-L2) with or without suspected PLC injury. Pathological fractures, multilevel injuries, obvious posterior bony element injury and translation/dislocation injuries were excluded. Ten patients were randomly selected and commonly reported CT parameters indicating PLC injury, including superior inferior endplate angle, vertebral body height loss, local kyphotic deformity, interspinous distance and interpedicular distance were assessed for variability. Observer values were compared with an experienced gold rater in spinal trauma. Analysis of variability was performed for all observers, between the principal investigators and also between observers participating in each center. Results: The studied parameters showed considerable variability in measurements among all observers and amongst all participating centers. The variability between the principal investigators was lower, but still substantial. The deviation of observer measurements from the gold rater were also significant for all CT parameters. Conclusions: CT-based radiological parameters previously reported to be suggestive of PLC injury showed considerable variability and magnetic resonance imaging verification of a PLC injury in all doubtful cases is suggested.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document