Portfolio optimization problem under concave transaction costs and minimal transaction unit constraints

2001 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Konno ◽  
Annista Wijayanayake
Keyword(s):  
Transaction Costs ◽  
Portfolio Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Portfolio Optimization Problem ◽  
Concave Transaction Costs

scholarly journals Hereditary Portfolio Optimization with Taxes and Fixed Plus Proportional Transaction Costs—Part II

2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 ◽  
pp. 1-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mou-Hsiung Chang
Keyword(s):  
Transaction Costs ◽  
Portfolio Optimization ◽  
Impulse Control ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Proportional Transaction Costs ◽  
Infinite Dimensional ◽  
Hereditary Nature ◽  
Portfolio Optimization Problem ◽  
The Value Function

This paper is the continuation of the paper entitled “Hereditary portfolio optimization with taxes and fixed plus proportional transaction costs I” that treats an infinite-time horizon hereditary portfolio optimization problem in a market that consists of one savings account and one stock account. Within the solvency region, the investor is allowed to consume from the savings account and can make transactions between the two assets subject to paying capital-gain taxes as well as a fixed plus proportional transaction cost. The investor is to seek an optimal consumption-trading strategy in order to maximize the expected utility from the total discounted consumption. The portfolio optimization problem is formulated as an infinite dimensional stochastic classical impulse control problem due to the hereditary nature of the stock price dynamics and inventories. This paper contains the verification theorem for the optimal strategy. It also proves that the value function is a viscosity solution of the QVHJBI.

scholarly journals Modeling and Optimizing the Multi-Objective Portfolio Optimization Problem with Trapezoidal Fuzzy Parameters

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Alejandro Estrada-Padilla ◽  
Daniela Lopez-Garcia ◽  
Claudia Gómez-Santillán ◽  
Héctor Joaquín Fraire-Huacuja ◽  
Laura Cruz-Reyes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Portfolio Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Solution Process ◽  
Density Estimator ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Spatial Spread ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Portfolio Optimization Problem

A common issue in the Multi-Objective Portfolio Optimization Problem (MOPOP) is the presence of uncertainty that affects individual decisions, e.g., variations on resources or benefits of projects. Fuzzy numbers are successful in dealing with imprecise numerical quantities, and they found numerous applications in optimization. However, so far, they have not been used to tackle uncertainty in MOPOP. Hence, this work proposes to tackle MOPOP’s uncertainty with a new optimization model based on fuzzy trapezoidal parameters. Additionally, it proposes three novel steady-state algorithms as the model’s solution process. One approach integrates the Fuzzy Adaptive Multi-objective Evolutionary (FAME) methodology; the other two apply the Non-Dominated Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) methodology. One steady-state algorithm uses the Spatial Spread Deviation as a density estimator to improve the Pareto fronts’ distribution. This research work’s final contribution is developing a new defuzzification mapping that allows measuring algorithms’ performance using widely known metrics. The results show a significant difference in performance favoring the proposed steady-state algorithm based on the FAME methodology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document