An efficient null-free procedure for deciding regular language membership

Author(s):  
J. -L. Ponty
2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 771-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Kucherov ◽  
Tamar Pinhas ◽  
Michal Ziv-Ukelson

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. M. Ravi ◽  
Alka Choubey ◽  
R. B. Patel ◽  
B. P. Singh

2017 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. 132-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordi A. Matías-Guiu ◽  
Fernando Cuetos ◽  
María Nieves Cabrera-Martín ◽  
María Valles-Salgado ◽  
Teresa Moreno-Ramos ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Stefano Crespi Reghizzi ◽  
Luca Breveglieri ◽  
Angelo Morzenti

Author(s):  
Amanda Goldrick-Jones ◽  
Daniel Chang

Writing centres offer a safe space for writers, including English-as-additional-language (EAL) students, to negotiate meaning and become more <luent with academic writing genres. However, a disconnect still exists between the writer-centred principles that inform WC tutoring practice and the pervasive myth that writing centres repair “broken” writing. An analysis of data from a writing centre’s client reports, as well as peer tutors’ comments and student writing samples, indicates that a student’s language membership does not predict types of writing challenges or errors. This <inding inspired a roundtable discussion about pedagogical approaches that not only empower EAL students but help writing centres resist the “broken writer” myth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document