Solution of the three-dimensional compressible, laminar, and turbulent boundary-layer equations with comparisons to experimental data

Author(s):  
Julius E. Harris ◽  
Dana J. Morris
1969 ◽  
Vol 73 (698) ◽  
pp. 143-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. K. Bull

Although a numerical solution of the turbulent boundary-layer equations has been achieved by Mellor and Gibson for equilibrium layers, there are many occasions on which it is desirable to have closed-form expressions representing the velocity profile. Probably the best known and most widely used representation of both equilibrium and non-equilibrium layers is that of Coles. However, when velocity profiles are examined in detail it becomes apparent that considerable care is necessary in applying Coles's formulation, and it seems to be worthwhile to draw attention to some of the errors and inconsistencies which may arise if care is not exercised. This will be done mainly by the consideration of experimental data. In the work on constant pressure layers, emphasis tends to fall heavily on the author's own data previously reported in ref. 1, because the details of the measurements are readily available; other experimental work is introduced where the required values can be obtained easily from the published papers.


2001 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 551-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
InSub Lee ◽  
Hong Sun Ryou ◽  
Seong Hyuk Lee ◽  
Ki Bae Hong ◽  
Soo Chae

It is the aim of this article to investigate numerically the effects of spanwise pressure gradient on an embedded streamwise vortex in a turbulent boundary layer. The governing equations were discretized by the finite volume method and SIMPLE algorithm was used to couple between pressure and velocity. The LRR model for Reynolds stresses was utilized to predict the anisotropy of turbulence effectively. The validation was done for two cases: one is the development of a streamwise vortex embedded in a pressure-driven, three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer. The other involves streamwise vortex pairs embedded in a turbulent boundary layer without the spanwise pressure gradient. In the case of the former, the predicted results were compared with Shizawa and Eaton’s experimental data. In the latter case, the calculated results were compared against the experimental data of Pauley and Eaton. We performed numerical simulations for three cases with different values of spanwise pressure gradient. As a result, the primary streamwise vortex with spanwise pressure gradients decays more rapidly than the case with no pressure gradients, as the spanwise pressure gradient increases. This indicates that the spanwise pressure gradient may play an important role on mean and turbulent structures. In particular, it can be seen that the increase of pressure gradient enhances a level of turbulent normal stresses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document