Evaluating alternate connection designs through multiagent negotiation

Author(s):  
Keith J. Werkman ◽  
Marcello Barone ◽  
Stephanie J. Wagaman ◽  
John Isman Wilson ◽  
Donald J. Hillman
Author(s):  
Francesco Amigoni ◽  
Andrea Castelletti ◽  
Paolo Gazzotti ◽  
Matteo Giuliani ◽  
Emanuele Mason

1995 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarit Kraus ◽  
Jonathan Wilkenfeld ◽  
Gilad Zlotkin

Author(s):  
Takayuki Ito ◽  
◽  
Toramatsu Shintani

We propose a utility revision mechanism for persuasion among agents in the Group Choice Design Support System (GCDSS). GCDSS is a group decision support system based on multiagent negotiation. In GCDSS, each user manages a system for an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and an agent. Each user subjectively constructs a decision hierarchy and determines weights of alternatives using AHP Based on the hierarchy and weights, agents negotiate with each other on behalf of users. In negotiation, agents attempt to persuade each other. If an agent is persuaded, the agent attempts to revise its utility for a state of its decision hierarchy by adjusting pairwise comparisons in AHP We propose a utility revision mechanism for persuasion among agents using the user’s subjective decision hierarchy of AHP to make persuasion more flexible. Agents try to make their decision hierarchy reliable to revise its utility.


2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 597-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian TANG ◽  
Liwei ZHENG ◽  
Zhi JIN

2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (20) ◽  
pp. 102-107
Author(s):  
Mário A. Correa ◽  
João B. Camargo ◽  
Ricardo A.V. Gimenes ◽  
Jorge R. Almeida

2012 ◽  
pp. 405-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique de la Hoz ◽  
Miguel A. López-Carmona ◽  
Iván Marsá-Maestre

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document