scholarly journals Sugar Water for Immunization Pain Management: Too Much Sweet Stuff?

2011 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-75
Author(s):  
Sandra Gerges ◽  
Mary-Ellen Hogan ◽  
Angela Girgis ◽  
Vinita Dubey ◽  
Anna Taddio
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 26-37
Author(s):  
Dewi Susanti ◽  
Alsri Windra Doni ◽  
Rizqi Twin Desfialni Putri

Coverage of measles immunization in Padang city is 88.8%, while the target of achieving national measles immunization is 95%. The reason a child is not immunized is 27.5% because it is delayed at another time. Pain management of nonpharmacological immunization with honey and sugar water can increase comfort so as to avoid delaying at another time. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in the effectiveness of honey and sugar water against the pain of measles immunization injection in infants aged 9-15 months. This type of research is a Quasi experiment with post test only design. sampling with a sample size of 32 people. Pain score data obtained from observation sheets and analyzed univariately and bivariately using an independent t test with computerization. The results of the study mean the pain score in the honey group was 1.19 while the mean pain score in the sugar water group was 1.88. After an independent t test was obtained p value = 0.038 (α <0.05) means that there is a difference in the effectiveness of honey and sugar water against the pain of measles immunization injection. The results of the study concluded that honey was more effective on measles immunization injection pain scores. The suggestion of this study was to improve the comfort of children by minimizing the pain of immunization injection using honey and sugar water.


Anaesthesia ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 56 (11) ◽  
pp. 1031-1033 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Phillips
Keyword(s):  
The Real ◽  

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 100703
Author(s):  
Shantanu Warhadpande ◽  
Stephanie L. Dybul ◽  
Minhaj S. Khaja

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (15) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
WILLIAM E. GOLDEN ◽  
ROBERT H. HOPKINS

VASA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 381-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Uhl ◽  
Thomas Betz ◽  
Andrea Rupp ◽  
Markus Steinbauer ◽  
Ingolf Töpel

Abstract. Summary: Background: This pilot study was set up to examine the effects of a continuous postoperative wound infusion system with a local anaesthetic on perioperative pain and the consumption of analgesics. Patients and methods: We included 42 patients in this prospective observational pilot study. Patients were divided into two groups. One group was treated in accordance with the WHO standard pain management protocol and in addition to that received a continuous local wound infusion treatment (Group 1). Group 2 was treated with analgesics in accordance with the WHO standard pain management protocol, exclusively. Results: The study demonstrated a significantly reduced postoperative VAS score for stump pain in Group 1 for the first 5 days. Furthermore, the intake of opiates was significantly reduced in Group 1 (day 1, Group 1: 42.1 vs. Group 2: 73.5, p = 0.010; day 2, Group 1: 27.7 vs. Group 2: 52.5, p = 0.012; day 3, Group 1: 23.9 vs. Group 2: 53.5, p = 0.002; day 4, Group 1: 15.7 vs. Group 2: 48.3, p = 0.003; day 5, Group 1 13.3 vs. Group 2: 49.9, p = 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups, neither in phantom pain intensity at discharge nor postoperative complications and death. Conclusions: Continuous postoperative wound infusion with a local anaesthetic in combination with a standard pain management protocol can reduce both stump pain and opiate intake in patients who have undergone transfemoral amputation. Phantom pain was not significantly affected.


PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement 14) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey L. Cohen ◽  
Crystal M. Stack ◽  
Jill E. MacLaren
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document