Discussion of “Incentive Compensation, Valuation, and Capital Market Access”

2009 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 361-365
Author(s):  
Werner Neus
Keyword(s):  
Capital Market ◽  
Market Access ◽  
Incentive Compensation

Incentive Compensation, Valuation, and Capital Market Access

2009 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helmut Laux ◽  
Robert M. Gillenkirch ◽  
Matthias M. Schabel
Keyword(s):  
Capital Market ◽  
Market Access ◽  
Incentive Compensation

Information Asymmetry and REIT Capital Market Access

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Devos ◽  
Erik Devos ◽  
Seow Eng Ong ◽  
Andrew C. Spieler
Keyword(s):  
Information Asymmetry ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Market Access

Capital Market Access and Financing of Private Firms*

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
VIDHAN K. GOYAL ◽  
ALESSANDRO NOVA ◽  
LAURA ZANETTI
Keyword(s):  
Capital Market ◽  
Market Access ◽  
Private Firms

The Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Market

2015 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 36-45
Author(s):  
Jing WAN
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Stock Market ◽  
Capital Markets ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Stock Markets ◽  
Market Access ◽  
Mainland China ◽  
Opening Up ◽  
Hong Kong Stock Market ◽  
The Capital Market

The Stock Connect scheme launched on 17 November 2014 was the first mutual market access between mainland China and Hong Kong stock markets. It is the biggest move ever in the opening up of the capital market. Experiences accumulated will be of great value to mainland regulators who will decide on how these experiences could be utilised for China’s future opening up of its capital markets and for accelerating renminbi internationalisation.

scholarly journals Reflections on the EU Third Country Regime for Capital Markets in the Shadow of Brexit

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-71
Author(s):  
Niamh Moloney
Keyword(s):  
Capital Markets ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Market Access ◽  
European Parliament ◽  
Direct Application ◽  
The Political ◽  
Economic Context ◽  
Legislative Reforms ◽  
The Eu

This article considers the recent evolution of the EU’s third country regime for capital market access in light of Brexit, the important series of legislative reforms adopted in March 2019 as the 2014-2019 European Parliament/Commission term closed, and the emergence of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) as a material technocratic influence. The article suggests that while the capital market third country regime is changing (with Brexit a key but not exclusive driver of change), it is not being radically recast, although it is tightening. The regime remains broadly based on the more-or-less liberal ‘deference’ model which has long characterised EU third-country financial services policy. But it is becoming increasingly ‘on-shored’ by means of the direct application of EU rules and by ESMA’s oversight/supervision of certain third country actors. The significantly more restrictive approach being taken to third country central clearing counterparties is a marked development, but here the political and economic context is distinct. The implications of the overall shift towards a more ‘on-shore’, centralised, and potentially restrictive access regime are considered, and a modest reform prescription is offered.

Capital market access and innovation efficiency: A natural experiment from China’s pilot VAT reform in 2012

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 549-566
Author(s):  
Duan Liu ◽  
Qianzhen Zhou ◽  
Shiqi Chen ◽  
Hong Wan ◽  
Hongbo He
Keyword(s):  
Capital Market ◽  
Natural Experiment ◽  
Market Access ◽  
Vat Reform
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document