Negative Automaintenance: Performance of Pigeons under Selective Omission Training Procedures

1984 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell Picker ◽  
Deborah Grossett ◽  
Jasper Thomas ◽  
Alan Poling
Keyword(s):  
Omission Training ◽  
Negative Automaintenance

scholarly journals NEGATIVE AUTOMAINTENANCE OMISSION TRAINING IS EFFECTIVE

2006 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Sanabria ◽  
Matthew T. Sitomer ◽  
Peter R. Killeen
Keyword(s):  
Omission Training ◽  
Negative Automaintenance

scholarly journals Omission training (negative automaintenance) in the rat: Effects of trial offset

1978 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Locurto ◽  
H. S. Terrace ◽  
John Gibbon
Keyword(s):  
Omission Training ◽  
Negative Automaintenance

scholarly journals The effects of prefeeding in autoshaping and omission training

1978 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald L. Rosenthal ◽  
T. James Matthews
Keyword(s):  
Omission Training

Omission Training

2013 ◽  
pp. 2085-2085
Author(s):  
Suzanne Macari ◽  
Ruth Eren ◽  
Louise Spear-Swerling ◽  
John T. Danial ◽  
Lawrence David Scahill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Omission Training

Omission Training

2021 ◽  
pp. 3226-3227
Author(s):  
Vicki Madaus Knapp ◽  
David McAdam
Keyword(s):  
Omission Training

Relative Effects of Omission Training and Extinction Training in Obese Subjects

1977 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 449-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff S. Topping ◽  
Cynthia M. Surratt ◽  
Billy A. Barrios
Keyword(s):  
Extinction Training ◽  
Omission Training ◽  
Obese Subjects

Omission training and extinction in rats with septal damage

1975 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Aaron ◽  
B.Michael Thorne
Keyword(s):  
Omission Training ◽  
Septal Damage

Omission Training Results in More Resurgence than Alternative Reinforcement

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucie M. Romano ◽  
Claire C. St. Peter
Keyword(s):  
Omission Training ◽  
Alternative Reinforcement

Effectiveness of Various Omission Training Procedures as a Function of Reinforcement History

1982 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 927-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Patricia Brockman ◽  
J. Michael Leibowitz
Keyword(s):  
Lever Press ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Relative Effectiveness ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Omission Training ◽  
Treatment Combination ◽  
Schedule Of Reinforcement ◽  
Reinforcement History ◽  
Rate Of Response ◽  
Better Than

This experiment analyzed the relative effectiveness of three different omission-training conditions (OT 5 sec., OT 20 sec., and gradual OT with a time-dependent criterion) in reducing a lever-press response following three different histories of reinforcement. 36 children between the ages of 4½ and 11 yr. were initially trained to press a lever according to a VR 35 schedule of reinforcement for 10 min. (Period I). Following acquisition, subjects were exposed to one of three conditions: DRL 10 sec. followed by OT, maintenance of VR followed by OT, or OT alone (Periods II and III). Over-all results indicated a significant reduction in response rate with the introduction or continuation of the various OT schedules. The DRL-OT treatment combination was significantly more effective in reducing response rate than the introduction of the same OT schedules following the lengthened VR history, but the use of the DRL-OT treatment combination was not significantly better than the OT condition of the same duration. OT was equally effective following both short (10 min.) and long (25 min.) VR histories. No significant differences were found in the relative effectiveness of the three types of OT schedules. These findings, however, may be related to the use of a time-dependent gradual OT schedule, as opposed to one in which the temporal values are increased as a function of the subjects' rate of response.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document