Effects of inoculum depth on the activity of Rhizoctonia solani and on bean root rot development in sterile soil

2008 ◽  
Vol 115 (4) ◽  
pp. 172-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Paula ◽  
C. Rotter ◽  
B. Hau
Keyword(s):  
Rhizoctonia Solani ◽  
Root Rot ◽  
Sterile Soil ◽  
Bean Root

scholarly journals Sensitivity of Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2 from Sugar Beet to Fungicides

Plant Disease ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 100 (12) ◽  
pp. 2427-2433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahar Arabiat ◽  
Mohamed F. R. Khan
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Rhizoctonia Solani ◽  
Root Rot ◽  
The United States ◽  
Damping Off ◽  
Growth Assay ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Crown And Root Rot ◽  
Mean Concentration

Rhizoctonia damping-off and crown and root rot caused by Rhizoctonia solani are major diseases of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) worldwide, and growers in the United States rely on fungicides for disease management. Sensitivity of R. solani to fungicides was evaluated in vitro using a mycelial radial growth assay and by evaluating disease severity on R. solani AG 2-2 inoculated plants treated with fungicides in the greenhouse. The mean concentration that caused 50% mycelial growth inhibition (EC50) values for baseline isolates (collected before the fungicides were registered for sugar beet) were 49.7, 97.1, 0.3, 0.2, and 0.9 μg ml−1 and for nonbaseline isolates (collected after registration and use of fungicides) were 296.1, 341.7, 0.9, 0.2, and 0.6 μg ml−1 for azoxystrobin, trifloxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, penthiopyrad, and prothioconazole, respectively. The mean EC50 values of azoxystrobin, trifloxystrobin, and pyraclostrobin significantly increased in the nonbaseline isolates compared with baseline isolates, with a resistant factor of 6.0, 3.5, and 3.0, respectively. Frequency of isolates with EC50 values >10 μg ml−1 for azoxystrobin and trifloxystrobin increased from 25% in baseline isolates to 80% in nonbaseline isolates. Although sensitivity of nonbaseline isolates of R. solani to quinone outside inhibitors decreased, these fungicides at labeled rates were still effective at controlling the pathogen under greenhouse conditions.

Efficiency of bacterial biosurfactant for biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani (AG - 4) causing root rot in faba bean (Vicia faba) plants

2018 ◽  
Vol 153 (4) ◽  
pp. 1237-1257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samia Ageeb Akladious ◽  
Eman Zakaria Gomaa ◽  
Omima Mohammed El-Mahdy
Keyword(s):  
Rhizoctonia Solani ◽  
Vicia Faba ◽  
Faba Bean ◽  
Root Rot

scholarly journals Blackeye bean root rot diseases identified

1991 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 27-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Erwin ◽  
Rudolph A. Khan ◽  
Carolyn Ver Linden ◽  
Carol Frate ◽  
Douglas Munier
Keyword(s):  
Root Rot ◽  
Bean Root

scholarly journals Temperature, Moisture, and Seed Treatment Effects on Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Soybean

Plant Disease ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 533-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Dorrance ◽  
M. D. Kleinhenz ◽  
S. A. McClure ◽  
N. T. Tuttle
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Rhizoctonia Solani ◽  
Root Rot ◽  
Seed Treatment ◽  
Anastomosis Group ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Root Weight ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Plant Stand ◽  
Growth Chamber Studies

The effects of temperature and soil moisture on infection and disease development by Rhizoctonia solani on soybean were studied individually. In addition, the anastomosis group of R. solani isolates recovered from soybean from 35 fields in 15 counties was determined. All of the 44 isolates recovered in this study were AG-2-2 IIIB. Five isolates of R. solani were able to infect and colonize soybean roots and hypocotyls at 20, 24, 28, and 32°C in growth chamber studies. The temperatures evaluated in this study were not limiting to the isolates tested. In greenhouse studies, nine R. solani isolates and a noninoculated control were evaluated at 25, 50, 75, and 100% soil moisture holding capacity (MHC). Root weights were greater and percent stand averages higher at 50 and 75% than at 25 or 100% MHC; however, as percentage of control, the main effect on percent moisture for percent stand, plant height, or root weight was not significant. There were significant differences among the isolates for the percent stand, root rot rating, and root fresh weight of soybean in each study. In both temperature and moisture studies, the R. solani isolates could be separated as predominantly causing (i) seed rot, as detected by greatly reduced plant stand; (ii) root rot generally having no effect on plant stand but a high root rot rating and low root weight; or (iii) hypocotyl lesions, having no effect on plant stand, a low root rot score, and a high number of red lesions on the hypocotyl. In the greenhouse seed treatment evaluations of five fungicides, there was no fungicide by isolate interaction using these pathogenic types of R. solani. None of the seed treatments evaluated in this study provided 100% control of the four isolates tested. Due to the wide range of environmental factors that permit R. solani infection and disease on soybeans, other control measures that last all season, such as host resistance, should be emphasized.

scholarly journals Management of Root Rot (Rhizoctonia solani) of Clusterbean through Fungicides

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 3235-3239
Author(s):  
Manisha Shivran ◽  
R. P. Ghasolia ◽  
Sushila Choudhary ◽  
Nitisha Gahlot ◽  
Meera Choudhary
Keyword(s):  
Rhizoctonia Solani ◽  
Root Rot

scholarly journals Potential of Pseudomonas putida, Bacillus subtilis, and their mixture on the management of Meloidogyne incognita, Pectobacterium betavasculorum, and Rhizoctonia solani disease complex of beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.)

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manzoor R. Khan ◽  
Zaki A. Siddiqui
Keyword(s):  
Bacillus Subtilis ◽  
Rhizoctonia Solani ◽  
Pseudomonas Putida ◽  
Beta Vulgaris ◽  
Meloidogyne Incognita ◽  
Root Rot ◽  
Growth Parameters ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Soft Rot ◽  
Disease Complex

AbstractEffects of Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus subtilis alone, and in combinations for the management of Meloidogyne incognita, Pectobacterium betavasculorum, and Rhizoctonia solani disease complex of beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.), were studied. Application of P. putida or B. subtilis to plants with M. incognita or P. betavasculorum or R. solani singly or in combinations caused a significant increase in plant growth parameters and the activities of defense enzymes. A significant increase in chlorophyll fluorescence attributes, viz., Fv/Fm, ɸPSII, qP, NPQ, and ETR were recorded in plants treated with P. putida or B. subtilis over pathogen-inoculated plants. Inoculation of P. putida results in a higher reduction in galling and nematode multiplication than B. subtilis. Maximum reduction in nematode multiplication and galling occurred when a mixture of P. putida and B. subtilis was used. Soft rot and root rot indices were 3 when Pectobacterium betavasculorum and Rhizoctonia solani were inoculated alone. The disease indices were rated 5 when these pathogens and M. incognita were inoculated in combinations. Inoculation of P. putida/B. subtilis with P. betavasculorum or R. solani reduced soft rot and root rot indices to 2 out of 3, while the use of P. putida + B. subtilis reduced indices to 1. Disease indices were reduced to 2–3 out of 5, when P. putida + B. subtilis were used to plants inoculated with two or three pathogens. The principal component analysis showed significant correlations among the various studied attributes. Two principal components explained a total of 86.1 and 93.4% of the overall data variability. Therefore, the use of P. putida together with B. subtilis had the potential for successful management of disease complex of beetroot.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document