The relationships among religious affiliation, religious angst, and disordered eating

K. Gates; Mary Pritchard

doi:10.1007/bf03354622

The relationships among religious affiliation, religious angst, and disordered eating

Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity ◽

10.1007/bf03354622 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

pp. e11-e15 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

K. Gates ◽

Mary Pritchard

Keyword(s):

Disordered Eating ◽

Religious Affiliation

Download Full-text

The Effects of Religious Affiliation on Disordered Eating and Religiosity

PsycEXTRA Dataset ◽

10.1037/e626972012-152 ◽

2008 ◽

Author(s):

Kimberly A. Gates ◽

Mary E. Pritchard

Keyword(s):

Disordered Eating ◽

Religious Affiliation

Download Full-text

Differential Item Functioning in Brief Instruments of Disordered Eating

European Journal of Psychological Assessment ◽

10.1027/1015-5759/a000472 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 35 (6) ◽

pp. 823-833 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Desiree Thielemann ◽

Felicitas Richter ◽

Bernd Strauss ◽

Elmar Braehler ◽

Uwe Altmann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Differential Item Functioning ◽

Disordered Eating ◽

Structural Equation ◽

Young Female ◽

Eating Attitudes ◽

Equation Model ◽

German Population ◽

Test Fairness ◽

Item Functioning ◽

Multiple Indicator

Abstract. Most instruments for the assessment of disordered eating were developed and validated in young female samples. However, they are often used in heterogeneous general population samples. Therefore, brief instruments of disordered eating should assess the severity of disordered eating equally well between individuals with different gender, age, body mass index (BMI), and socioeconomic status (SES). Differential item functioning (DIF) of two brief instruments of disordered eating (SCOFF, Eating Attitudes Test [EAT-8]) was modeled in a representative sample of the German population ( N = 2,527) using a multigroup item response theory (IRT) and a multiple-indicator multiple-cause (MIMIC) structural equation model (SEM) approach. No DIF by age was found in both questionnaires. Three items of the EAT-8 showed DIF across gender, indicating that females are more likely to agree than males, given the same severity of disordered eating. One item of the EAT-8 revealed slight DIF by BMI. DIF with respect to the SCOFF seemed to be negligible. Both questionnaires are equally fair across people with different age and SES. The DIF by gender that we found with respect to the EAT-8 as screening instrument may be also reflected in the use of different cutoff values for men and women. In general, both brief instruments assessing disordered eating revealed their strengths and limitations concerning test fairness for different groups.

Download Full-text