Cognitive behavioural therapy for obesity: One-year follow-up in a clinical setting

2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Melchionda ◽  
L. Besteghi ◽  
S. Di Domizio ◽  
F. Pasqui ◽  
C. Nuccitelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Clinical Setting ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
One Year

Durability of the effects of cognitive–behavioural therapy in the treatment of chronic schizophrenia: 12-month follow-up

1999 ◽  
Vol 174 (6) ◽  
pp. 500-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Tarrier ◽  
Anja Witttkowskj ◽  
Caroline Kinney ◽  
Eilis McCarthy ◽  
Juue Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Negative Symptoms ◽  
Chronic Schizophrenia ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Psychotic Symptoms ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Supportive Counselling ◽  
One Year

BackgroundPersistent drug-resistant psychotic symptoms are a pervasive problem in the treatment of schizophrenia.AimsTo evaluate the durability of the treatment effects of cognitive–behavioural therapy for chronic schizophrenia one year after treatment termination.MethodA comparison of clinical outcomes was made at one-year follow-up from a randomised trial of cognitive–behavioural therapy, supportive counselling and routine care alone in the treatment of chronic schizophrenia.ResultsSeventy out of the 72 patients (97%) who completed treatment were assessed at follow-up. There were significant differences between the three groups when positive and negative symptoms were analysed by means of ANCOVAs. Between-group comparisons indicated significant differences between cognitive–behavioural therapy and routine care at follow-up for positive symptoms. There was a trend towards significance for both cognitive–behavioural therapy and supportive counselling to be superior to routine care alone on negative symptoms.ConclusionsAt 12-month follow-up the significant advantage of cognitive– behavioural therapy compared to routine care alone remained.

scholarly journals An investigation of general predictors for cognitive–behavioural therapy outcome for anxiety disorders in a routine clinical setting

BMJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. e010898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Kerstine Kaya Nielsen ◽  
Signe Vangkilde ◽  
Kate B Wolitzky-Taylor ◽  
Sarah Ingrid Franksdatter Daniel ◽  
Ida Hageman
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Clinical Setting ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Therapy Outcome ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Routine Clinical Setting

scholarly journals Cognitive–behavioural therapy for refractory psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia resistant to atypical antipsychotic medication

2005 ◽  
Vol 186 (4) ◽  
pp. 324-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia R. Valmaggia ◽  
Mark van der Gaag ◽  
Nicholas Tarrier ◽  
Marieke Pijnenborg ◽  
Cees J. Slooff
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Psychotic Symptoms ◽  
Positive Symptoms ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Supportive Counselling ◽  
Treatment Refractory

BackgroundThere is increasing evidence that cognitive–behavioural therapy can be an effective intervention for patients experiencing drug-refractory positive symptoms of schizophrenia.AimsTo investigate the effects of cognitive–behavioural therapy on in-patients with treatment-refractory psychotic symptoms.MethodManualised therapy was compared with supportive counselling in a randomised controlled study. Both interventions were delivered by experienced psychologists over 16 sessions of treatment. Therapy fidelity was assessed by two independent raters. Participants underwent masked assessment at baseline, after treatment and at 6 months' follow-up. Main outcome measures were the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Psychotic Symptoms Rating Scale. The analysis was by intention to treat.ResultsParticipants receiving cognitive–behavioural therapy had improved with regard to auditory hallucinations and illness insight at the post-treatment assessment, but these findings were not maintained at follow-up.ConclusionsCognitive–behavioural therapy showed modest short-term benefits over supportive counselling for treatment-refractory positive symptoms of schizophrenia.

Long-term Effects of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy and Lithium Therapy on Depression in the Elderly

1995 ◽  
Vol 167 (5) ◽  
pp. 653-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. C. M. Wilson ◽  
M. Scott ◽  
M. Abou-Saleh ◽  
R. Burns ◽  
J. R. M. Copeland
Keyword(s):  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Lithium Therapy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Depression Severity ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

BackgroundWe examine the effects of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) as an adjuvant to acute physical treatment and lithium maintenance therapy in reducing depression severity over a follow-up year in elderly depressed patients.MethodThe study consists of three phases. During the acute treatment and continuation phase, 17 of 31 patients received CBT as an adjuvant to treatment as usual. During the maintenance phase of 1 year, subjects were entered into a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of low-dose lithium therapy.ResultsReceiving adjuvant CBT significantly reduced patients' scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression during the follow-up year (repeated measures analyses of variance; P = 0.007). No significant differences were found between lithium and placebo maintenance therapy.ConclusionsCBT can be adapted as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of severely depressed elderly patients and reduces depression severity during follow-up. The prophylactic failure of long-term lithium therapy may be explained through poor compliance.

scholarly journals Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Nightmares for Patients with Persecutory Delusions (Nites): An Assessor-Blind, Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
pp. 070674371984742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryony Sheaves ◽  
Emily A. Holmes ◽  
Stephanie Rek ◽  
Kathryn M. Taylor ◽  
Alecia Nickless ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Persecutory Delusions ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

Objective:Nightmares are relatively common in patients experiencing psychosis but rarely assessed or treated. Nightmares may maintain persecutory delusions by portraying fears in sensory-rich detail. We tested the potential benefits of imagery-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for nightmares on nightmare severity and persecutory delusions.Method:This assessor-blind parallel-group pilot trial randomized 24 participants with nightmares and persecutory delusions to receive CBT for nightmares delivered over 4 weeks in addition to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Assessments were at 0, 4 (end of treatment), and 8 weeks (follow-up). Feasibility outcomes assessed therapy uptake, techniques used, satisfaction, and attrition. The primary efficacy outcome assessed nightmare severity at week 4. Analyses were intention to treat, estimating treatment effect with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results:All participants offered CBT completed therapy (mean [SD], 4.8 [0.6] sessions) with high satisfaction, and 20 (83%) participants completed all assessments. Compared with TAU, CBT led to large improvements in nightmares (adjusted mean difference = −7.0; 95% CI, –12.6 to –1.3; d = –1.1) and insomnia (6.3; 95% CI, 2.6 to 10.0; d = 1.4) at week 4. Gains were maintained at follow-up. Suicidal ideation was not exacerbated by CBT but remained stable to follow-up, compared with TAU, which reduced at follow-up (6.8; 95% CI, 0.3 to 3.3; d = 0.7). CBT led to reductions in paranoia (–20.8; 95% CI, –43.2 to 1.7; d = –0.6), although CIs were wide. Three serious adverse events were deemed unrelated to participation (CBT = 2, TAU = 1).Conclusions:CBT for nightmares is feasible and may be efficacious for treating nightmares and comorbid insomnia for patients with persecutory delusions. It shows promise on paranoia but potentially not on suicidal ideation.

Targeting fear of positive evaluation in patients with social anxiety disorder via a brief cognitive behavioural therapy protocol: a proof-of-principle study

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 745-750
Author(s):  
Justin W. Weeks ◽  
M. Taylor Wilmer ◽  
Carrie M. Potter ◽  
Elizabeth M. Waldron ◽  
Mark Versella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorder ◽  
Social Anxiety ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Social Anxiety Disorder ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Proof Of Principle ◽  
Fear Of Positive Evaluation ◽  
Positive Evaluation

AbstractBackground:Our aim was to develop a brief cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) protocol to augment treatment for social anxiety disorder (SAD). This protocol focused specifically upon fear of positive evaluation (FPE). To our knowledge, this is the first protocol that has been designed to systematically target FPE.Aims:To test the feasibility of a brief (two-session) CBT protocol for FPE and report proof-of-principle data in the form of effect sizes.Method:Seven patients with a principal diagnosis of SAD were recruited to participate. Following a pre-treatment assessment, patients were randomized to either (a) an immediate CBT condition (n = 3), or (b) a comparable wait-list (WL) period (2 weeks; n = 4). Two WL patients also completed the CBT protocol following the WL period (delayed CBT condition). Patients completed follow-up assessments 1 week after completing the protocol.Results:A total of five patients completed the brief, FPE-specific CBT protocol (two of the seven patients were wait-listed only and did not complete delayed CBT). All five patients completed the protocol and provided 1-week follow-up data. CBT patients demonstrated large reductions in FPE-related concerns as well as overall social anxiety symptoms, whereas WL patients demonstrated an increase in FPE-related concerns.Conclusions:Our brief FPE-specific CBT protocol is feasible to use and was associated with large FPE-specific and social anxiety symptom reductions. To our knowledge, this is the first treatment report that has focused on systematic treatment of FPE in patients with SAD. Our protocol warrants further controlled evaluation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document