Involvements of stress triaxiality in the brittle fracture during earthquakes in steel bridge bents

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Tamura ◽  
Eiichi Sasaki ◽  
Hitoshi Yamada ◽  
Hiroshi Katsuchi ◽  
Theeraphong Chanpheng
2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 420-434
Author(s):  
Hiroshi TAMURA ◽  
Eiichi SASAKI ◽  
Hitoshi YAMADA ◽  
Hiroshi KATSUCHI

Author(s):  
Jean-Philippe Mathieu ◽  
Olivier Diard ◽  
Karim Inal ◽  
Sophie Berveiller

The present study describes a multiscale representation of mechanisms involved in brittle fracture of a french Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) steel (16MND5 equ. ASTM A508 Cl.3) at low temperatures. Attention will be focused on the representation of stress heterogeneities inside the ferritic matrix during plastic straining, which is considered as critical for further micromechanical approach of brittle fracture. This representation is tuned on experimental results [1]. Modeling involves micromechanical a description of plastic glide, a mean field (MF) model and a realistic three-dimensional aggregates Finite Element (FE) simulation, all put together inside a multiscale approach. Calibration is done on macroscopic stress-strain curves at different low temperatures, and modeling reproduces experimental stress heterogeneities. This modeling allows to apply a local micromechanical fracture criterion of crystallographic cleavage for triaxial loadings on the Representative Volume Element (RVE). Deterministic computations of time to fracture for different carbide sizes random selection provide a probability of fracture for an Elementary Volume (EV) consistant with the local approach. Results are in good agreement with hypothesis made by local approach to fracture. Hence, the main difference is that no phenomenological dependence on loading or microstructure is supposed for probability of fracture on the EV: this dependence is naturally introduced by the micromechanical description.


Author(s):  
Michelle Y. X. Chien ◽  
Scott Walbridge ◽  
Bertram Kühn

Brittle fracture is a major concern to structural engineers as it has significant consequences for safety and cost. Although modern day occurrences of brittle fracture are rare, it is well known that they can occur without warning and may lead to the sudden closure of a bridge, loss of service, expensive repairs, and/or loss of property or life. In Canada, steel bridge fracture is a particularly significant concern because of the harsh climate. If the toughness properties are improperly specified, many steels could be on the lower shelf of the toughness-temperature curve. A comparison of brittle fracture design provisions around the world reveals that more sophisticated approaches have been developed for modeling and understanding brittle fracture in existing and new bridges than those currently in use in North America, including Canada and the U.S.A. This paper describes the European brittle fracture provisions and presents a comparison of the North American and European design provisions using the example of a typical steel-concrete composite highway bridge. On the basis of this comparison, situations where one set of design rules may be more or less conservative are identified, and opportunities for improvement and areas warranting further study are highlighted.


2019 ◽  
Vol 300 ◽  
pp. 11007
Author(s):  
Noritaka Nakamura ◽  
Tomoya Kawabata ◽  
Yasuhito Takashima ◽  
Yuki Nishizono ◽  
Fuminori Yanagimoto

To observe the effect of stress triaxiality upon brittle fracture surface, we performed two types of experiments which differ in stress triaxiality. As a result, crack branch starting speed changes in two specimens and the speed was affected by stress triaxiality. In bending condition, branch starting speed is around 0.86 cr (cr: Rayleigh wave speed), which is higher than that in tensile condition, 0.59 cr. It was realized that in higher stress triaxiality, branching is easy to occur because in bending condition stress triaxiality is said to be lower. On the other hand, mirror-mist transition speed is not affected by stress triaxiality. By fracture surface observation, we proposed that branch occurs when microbranch grew. This proposition was supported by FEM calculation with microbranch model, it was proved that in bending condition microbranch is difficult to grow. Additionally, we proposed a qualitative explanation that microbranch is easy to grow when stress triaxiality is higher because growth of microbranch is affected by T-stress. It is since the phenomena is not on the main crack propagating plane.


2009 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumiyoshi Minami ◽  
Mitsuru Ohata ◽  
Daisuke Watanabe ◽  
Satoshi Igi ◽  
Takahiro Kubo ◽  
...  

With increasing demand of high-strength and high-pressure pipelines in gas transmission industries, the fracture control design of pipelines has been a driving factor to ensure the integrity of the pipeline. This paper addresses the stress and strain fields for a crack in a wide plate component under biaxial loading, which simulates a large-diameter pipe subjected to inner pressure coupled with axial loading. Attention is focused on the initiation of brittle fracture (stress controlled type) as well as ductile fracture (strain controlled type). Three-dimensional finite element-analyses are conducted. It was found that biaxial loading has a significant effect on the stress fields of through-thickness crack; the near-crack-tip stress is elevated to a large extent by biaxial loading. By contrast, the stress field for a surface crack is not sensitive to biaxial loading, while the near-crack-tip stress at the crack corner is increased locally by biaxial loading. The Weibull stress criterion was applied to discuss the biaxial loading effect on the brittle fracture strength of the wide plate. Ductile crack initiation properties are also discussed with two-parameter (plastic strain and stress triaxiality) diagram. The ductile damage is increased by biaxial loading for a through-thickness crack, whereas a surface crack has little effect of biaxial loading on the ductile damage.


2003 ◽  
pp. 93-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eiichi SASAKI ◽  
Taiji ARAKAWA ◽  
Chitoshi MIKI ◽  
Atsushi ICHIKAWA

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document