Role of key mortality factors in overlapping generations ofEarias vittella (Fabricius) in insecticides treated cotton field

1984 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 485-489
Author(s):  
P R Jadhav ◽  
G G Bilapate
2018 ◽  
Vol 174 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-141
Author(s):  
Ézio M. da Silva ◽  
Ricardo S. da Silva ◽  
Laércio J. da Silva ◽  
Pablo da Costa Gontijo ◽  
Tarcísio V. da Silva Galdino ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-31
Author(s):  
Xavier Raurich ◽  
Thomas Seegmuller

The aim of this paper is to study the role of the distribution of income by age group on the existence of speculative bubbles. A crucial question is whether this distribution may promote a bubble associated to a larger level of capital, that is a productive bubble. We address these issues in an overlapping generations model where agents live three periods and productive investment done in the first period of life is an illiquid investment whose return occurs in the following two periods. A bubble is a liquid speculative investment that facilitates intertemporal consumption smoothing. We show that the distribution of income by age group determines both the existence and the effect of bubbles on aggregate production. We also show that fiscal policy, by changing the distribution of income, may facilitate or prevent the existence of bubbles and may also modify the effect that bubbles have on aggregate production.


2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 387
Author(s):  
S.M. Jadhao ◽  
P.R. Shinde ◽  
C.G. Sawant ◽  
S.S. Shetgar

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 643-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Antoci ◽  
Luca Gori ◽  
Mauro Sodini ◽  
Elisa Ticci

AbstractThis article analyzes a general equilibrium growth model with overlapping generations and (production-induced) environmental degradation. Individuals react to environmental damages through mitigation or adaptation. In the former case, they reduce production and its environmental impact. In the latter, they do not tackle the causes of the problem but rather its consequences (i.e., the wellbeing loss due to environmental degradation) by increasing defensive expenditures. Despite its simplicity, the model can generate different long-term outcomes: convergence to a stationary state following a unique trajectory or local/global indeterminacy. In the last scenario, initial conditions (history) and individual expectations matter and the model can generate coordination failures and endogenous fluctuations. Results cast doubt on solutions to environmental problems relying on the role of individual behavior change or adaptation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document