Effects of traumatic brain injury in rats on binding to forebrain opiate receptor subtypes

1992 ◽  
Vol 16 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 95-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Perry ◽  
Bruce G. Lyeth ◽  
Leonard P. Miller ◽  
Rena L. Getz ◽  
Larry W. Jenkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Opiate Receptor ◽  
Receptor Subtypes

scholarly journals Role of the PGE 2 receptor subtypes EP1, EP2, and EP3 in repetitive traumatic brain injury

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 628-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Catlin ◽  
Jenna L. Leclerc ◽  
Krunal Shukla ◽  
Sarah M. Marini ◽  
Sylvain Doré
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Receptor Subtypes

Estrogen Neuroprotection and Anti-Inflammation Actions in the Hippocampus

2020 ◽  
pp. 401-415
Author(s):  
Roshni D. Thakkar ◽  
Ruimin Wang ◽  
Gangadhara R. Sareddy ◽  
Ratna K. Vadlamudi ◽  
Darrell W. Brann
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Glutamic Acid ◽  
Steroid Hormone ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Activator Protein ◽  
Anti Inflammation

The steroid hormone 17β‎-estradiol (E2) is neuroprotective in several neurodegenerative conditions, including cerebral ischemia, traumatic brain injury, and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This chapter focuses on the evidence supporting a neuroprotective role of E2 in the hippocampus in cerebral ischemia and AD and reviews various mechanisms thought to underlie E2-induced neuroprotection. Specifically, the chapter discusses the mechanistic role of (a) the various estrogen receptor subtypes, (b) genomic versus nongenomic signaling, (c) regulation of the prosurvival Wnt/β‎−catenin pathway, and (d) anti-inflammatory effects of E2 in the hippocampus. Finally, we also discuss the role of a novel estrogen receptor co-activator protein, proline-, glutamic acid-, and leucine-rich protein 1 (PELP1) in mediating E2 genomic and non-genomic signaling, as well as the neuroprotective and cognitive-enhancing effects of E2 in the hippocampus.

Endogenous opioids may mediate secondary damage after experimental brain injury

1987 ◽  
Vol 253 (5) ◽  
pp. E565-E574 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. K. McIntosh ◽  
R. L. Hayes ◽  
D. S. DeWitt ◽  
V. Agura ◽  
A. I. Faden
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Traumatic Injury ◽  
Opiate Receptors ◽  
Opiate Receptor ◽  
Endogenous Opioids ◽  
Secondary Brain Injury ◽  
Secondary Damage ◽  
Cord Injury

Although endogenous opioids have been implicated in the pathophysiology of spinal cord injury and brain ischemia, the role of specific opioid peptides and opiate receptors in the pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury remains unexplored. This study examined regional changes in brain opioid immunoreactivity and cerebral blood flow (CBF) after fluid-percussion brain injury in the cat and compared the effect of an opiate antagonist (Win 44,441-3 [Win-(-)]) with its dextroisomer Win 44,441-2 [Win-(+)] (which is inactive at opiate receptors) in the treatment of brain injury. Dynorphin A immunoreactivity (Dyn A-IR) but not leucine-enkephalin-like immunoreactivity accumulated in injury regions after traumatic injury; Dyn-IR increases also occurred predominantly in those areas showing significant decreases in regional CBF. Administration of Win-(-) but not Win-(+) or saline at 15 min after injury significantly improved mean arterial pressure, electroencephalographic amplitude, and regional CBF and reduced the severity and incidence of hemorrhage. Win-(-) also significantly improved survival after brain injury. Taken together, these findings suggest that dynorphin, through actions at opiate receptors, may contribute to the pathophysiology of secondary brain injury after head trauma and indicate that selective opiate-receptor antagonists may be useful in treatment of traumatic brain injury.

The effect of female sexual hormones on the intestinal and serum cytokine response after traumatic brain injury: different roles for estrogen receptor subtypes

2013 ◽  
Vol 91 (9) ◽  
pp. 700-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Khaksari ◽  
Zakieh Keshavarzi ◽  
Ahmad Gholamhoseinian ◽  
Bahram Bibak
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Α ◽  
Female Rats ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Sexual Hormones ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Vehicle Treated Group

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of female sexual hormones on intestinal and serum cytokines following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Adult female rats were ovariectomized and distributed among the following 9 groups: (i) sham trauma, (ii) TBI (Marmarou’s method), (iii) vehicle (dimethylsulfoxide) treated, (iv) estrogen (E2) treated, (v) progesterone (P) treated, (vi) treated with E2+P, (vii) propylpyrazole triol (PPT) treated, (viii) diarylpropionitrile (DPN) treated, and (ix) control. PPT and DPN are estrogen receptor αand β agonists, respectively. Serum and intestinal levels of interleukin (IL)-1β were increased by TBI (P < 0.001). The level of intestinal IL-1β was increased in the group treated with E2 (P < 0.001). There was a reduction in serum IL-1β (P < 0.01) and an increase in intestinal IL-1β level (P < 0.001) in the PPT-treated group compared with the vehicle-treated group. TBI reduced serum IL-6 (P < 0.01) and increased intestinal IL-6 (P < 0.001). Serum IL-6 was increased in the group treated with E2 (P < 0.001), P (P < 0.001), E2+P (P < 0.01), and DPN (P < 0.001) after TBI; however, intestinal IL-6 was higher in the E2-treated group compared with the vehicle-treated group (P < 0.01). Intestinal tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) was increased by TBI (P < 0.001). Progesterone decreased serum TNF-α (P < 0.01). Intestinal TNF-α in the E2 (P < 0.01), E2+P (P < 0.001), and PPT (P < 0.001) treatment groups was less than in the vehicle-treated group. In conclusion, estrogen influences the intestinal levels of proinflammatory cytokines, in particular TNF-α, mediated through estrogen receptor α.

Cognitive control constrains memory attributions

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen M. Kelley ◽  
Larry L. Jacoby
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Cognitive Control

Abstract Cognitive control constrains retrieval processing and so restricts what comes to mind as input to the attribution system. We review evidence that older adults, patients with Alzheimer's disease, and people with traumatic brain injury exert less cognitive control during retrieval, and so are susceptible to memory misattributions in the form of dramatic levels of false remembering.

Lessons Learned From Coaching Postsecondary Students With Traumatic Brain Injury

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-96
Author(s):  
Mary R. T. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Sense Of Self ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Sudden Onset ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Exhaustive List

Purpose The purpose of this clinical focus article is to provide speech-language pathologists with a brief update of the evidence that provides possible explanations for our experiences while coaching college students with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Method The narrative text provides readers with lessons we learned as speech-language pathologists functioning as cognitive coaches to college students with TBI. This is not meant to be an exhaustive list, but rather to consider the recent scientific evidence that will help our understanding of how best to coach these college students. Conclusion Four lessons are described. Lesson 1 focuses on the value of self-reported responses to surveys, questionnaires, and interviews. Lesson 2 addresses the use of immediate/proximal goals as leverage for students to update their sense of self and how their abilities and disabilities may alter their more distal goals. Lesson 3 reminds us that teamwork is necessary to address the complex issues facing these students, which include their developmental stage, the sudden onset of trauma to the brain, and having to navigate going to college with a TBI. Lesson 4 focuses on the need for college students with TBI to learn how to self-advocate with instructors, family, and peers.

The Speech-Language Pathologists' Role in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Middle and High School–Age Children: Viewpoints on Guidelines From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1363-1370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Brown ◽  
Katy O'Brien ◽  
Kelly Knollman-Porter ◽  
Tracey Wallace
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
School Age ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Centers For Disease Control

Purpose The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently released guidelines for rehabilitation professionals regarding the care of children with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Given that mTBI impacts millions of children each year and can be particularly detrimental to children in middle and high school age groups, access to universal recommendations for management of postinjury symptoms is ideal. Method This viewpoint article examines the CDC guidelines and applies these recommendations directly to speech-language pathology practices. In particular, education, assessment, treatment, team management, and ongoing monitoring are discussed. In addition, suggested timelines regarding implementation of services by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are provided. Specific focus is placed on adolescents (i.e., middle and high school–age children). Results SLPs are critical members of the rehabilitation team working with children with mTBI and should be involved in education, symptom monitoring, and assessment early in the recovery process. SLPs can also provide unique insight into the cognitive and linguistic challenges of these students and can serve to bridge the gap among rehabilitation and school-based professionals, the adolescent with brain injury, and their parents. Conclusion The guidelines provided by the CDC, along with evidence from the field of speech pathology, can guide SLPs to advocate for involvement in the care of adolescents with mTBI. More research is needed to enhance the evidence base for direct assessment and treatment with this population; however, SLPs can use their extensive knowledge and experience working with individuals with traumatic brain injury as a starting point for post-mTBI care.

Traumatic Brain Injury: The Day My World Changed

ASHA Leader ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (13) ◽  
pp. 38-38
Author(s):  
G. Gayle Kelley
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document