Effect of soil matric potential on leaf water potential, diffusive resistance, growth and development ofGmelina arborea L. seedlings

1979 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. E. Fasehun
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Growth And Development ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Soil Matric Potential ◽  
Matric Potential ◽  
Diffusive Resistance

scholarly journals Relationship between Soil and Plant Water Status in Wine Grapes under Various Water Deficit Regimes

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 585-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Centeno ◽  
Pilar Baeza ◽  
José Ramón Lissarrague
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Water Status ◽  
Soil Water Potential ◽  
Threshold Value ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Wine Grape ◽  
Soil Matric Potential ◽  
Matric Potential

Limited water supply in arid and semiarid Mediterranean environments demands improving irrigation efficiency. The purpose of this study was to determine a functional relationship between soil water availability and wine grape (Vitis vinifera) water status to determine a threshold value of soil matric potential to trigger irrigation. Seasonal trends of soil water potential, leaf water potential, and stomatal conductance (gS) of ‘Tempranillo’ wine grape were determined in two deficit irrigation treatments replenishing 45% and 30% of the reference evapotranspiration, and in a third non-irrigated treatment during 2001 and 2002. Soil water potential was measured with granular matrix soil moisture sensors placed at 0.3 m (Ψ0.3), 0.6 m (Ψ0.6), and 1.2 m (Ψ1.2) depths. The sensors at 0.3 m depth quickly responded to irrigation by increasing Ψ0.3 levels. At the 0.6 m depth, Ψ0.6 progressively decreased, showing significant differences between T1 and the rest of the treatments, while no significant differences in Ψ1.2 were found. All relationships between profile soil matric potential and leaf water potential and gS were highly correlated. After integrating our data with previous studies, we suggest a whole profile soil water potential value of –0.12 MPa as threshold to trigger irrigation and avoid severe water stress during berry growth.

Anomalous Water Relations in Copper-Deficient Wheat Plants

1976 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 229 ◽  
Author(s):  
RD Graham
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Water Content ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Copper Deficiency ◽  
Water Status ◽  
Specific Effect ◽  
Water Levels ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Diffusive Resistance ◽  
Effect Of Copper

Leaf water potential, diffusive resistance, relative water content, weekly water use, yields and head bending were measured on wheat plants subjected to four copper levels (0, 0.4, 0.8 or 4.0 mg Cu per pot) and two water levels (6 or 12% soil water content). Severe copper deficiency (Cu 0) resulted in no grain yield, wilting, increased leaf diffusive resistance and, at the same time, increased leaf water potential relative to plants receiving 4.0 mg Cu (Cu 4.0). Water supply effects were observed but there was no interaction between copper and water treatments. Mild copper deficiency (Cu 0.4, Cu 0.8) resulted in small yield decreases, relative to Cu 4.0, and increased head bending towards maturity. It is concluded that wilting, characteristic of copper-deficient plants, is due to structural weakness (decreased lignification) and not to the water status of the plants; also, increased leaf diffusive resistance is due to a specific effect of copper deficiency on guard cells and not to decreased leaf water potential.

scholarly journals DIFFUSIVE RESISTANCE, TRANSPIRATION, AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN SINGLE LEAVES OF CORN AND SORGHUM IN RELATION TO LEAF WATER POTENTIAL

1973 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 537-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L. BEADLE ◽  
K. R. STEVENSON ◽  
H. H. NEUMANN ◽  
G. W. THURTELL ◽  
K. M. KING
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Zea Mays L ◽  
Narrow Range ◽  
Light Flux ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Diffusive Resistance ◽  
Chamber Studies ◽  
Growth Chamber Studies ◽  
Mesophyll Resistance

Growth chamber studies were conducted to determine the relationships between leaf water potential and diffusive resistance, transpiration rate, and photosynthesis in corn (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum vulgare L.). Few differences were apparent between species in response to leaf water potentials above −8 to −6 bars at all light flux densities used. At lower potentials their ability to withstand water stress differed. Rapid increases in both total resistance to water vapor and mesophyll resistance to carbon dioxide within a narrow range of water potential were observed in corn with simultaneous decreases in transpiration and photosynthesis. More gradual changes occurred in sorghum, with little increase in mesophyll resistance except at the highest light flux density. Photosynthetic rate of sorghum was still 25% of maximum at −11.5 bars whereas corn was severely wilted and photosynthesis had ceased at a similar water potential.

The Components of Leaf Water Potential I. Osmotic and Matric Potentials

1967 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 329 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Warren Wilson ◽  
CW Rose
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Osmotic Potential ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Matric Potential ◽  
Tissue Matrix

Osmotic potential ('IT) resulting from solutes should be distinguished from matric potential (T) resulting from adsorption by the tissue matrix. The usual methods of measuring so�called "osmotic potential" actually give not only 'IT but also part or all of T.

COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO INBRED CORN LINES FOR DIFFUSIVE RESISTANCES, PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND TRANSPIRATION AS A FUNCTION OF LEAF WATER POTENTIAL

1974 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 765-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. DUBÉ ◽  
K. R. STEVENSON ◽  
G. W. THURTELL
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Zea Mays L ◽  
Stomatal Closure ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Water Potentials ◽  
Diffusive Resistance ◽  
Response To Water ◽  
Mesophyll Resistance

Relationships between (1) photosynthesis (2) transpiration (3) total diffusive resistance to water vapor and (4) mesophyll resistance and leaf water potential were examined in two lines of corn (Zea mays L.) differing in phenotypic response to water stress. One line (Q-188) was a wilting inbred and the other (DR-1) was an inbred known to have at least some heat and drought resistance under field conditions. No differences were found between inbred lines in net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate and total diffusive resistance to water vapor at high or low leaf water potentials in the light. In both lines, stomatal closure began to occur between − 8.5 to − 9.5 bars. Similarly, rapid increases in both total resistance to water vapor diffusion and mesophyll resistance to carbon dioxide diffusion occurred within a narrow range of water potentials. However, leaf water potential, and thus all other parameters, differed markedly between lines when considered on a time scale. The early wilting of Q-188 suggested that high resistances to water flow were present in the xylem system.

scholarly journals Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Symbiosis Enhances Water Status and Soil-Plant Hydraulic Conductance Under Drought

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohanned Abdalla ◽  
Mutez Ali Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Water Status ◽  
Hydraulic Conductance ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Plant Water Status ◽  
Soil Drying ◽  
Plant Water ◽  
Matric Potential ◽  
Soil Interface

Recent studies have identified soil drying as a dominant driver of transpiration reduction at the global scale. Although Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Fungi (AMF) are assumed to play a pivotal role in plant response to soil drying, studies investigating the impact of AMF on plant water status and soil-plant hydraulic conductance are lacking. Thus, the main objective of this study was to investigate the influence of AMF on soil-plant conductance and plant water status of tomato under drought. We hypothesized that AMF limit the drop in matric potential across the rhizosphere, especially in drying soil. The underlying mechanism is that AMF extend the effective root radius and hence reduce the water fluxes at the root-soil interface. The follow-up hypothesis is that AMF enhance soil-plant hydraulic conductance and plant water status during soil drying. To test these hypotheses, we measured the relation between transpiration rate, soil and leaf water potential of tomato with reduced mycorrhiza colonization (RMC) and the corresponding wild type (WT). We inoculated the soil of the WT with Rhizophagus irregularis spores to potentially upsurge symbiosis initiation. During soil drying, leaf water potential of the WT did not drop below −0.8MPa during the first 6days after withholding irrigation, while leaf water potential of RMC dropped below −1MPa already after 4days. Furthermore, AMF enhanced the soil-plant hydraulic conductance of the WT during soil drying. In contrast, soil-plant hydraulic conductance of the RMC declined more abruptly as soil dried. We conclude that AMF maintained the hydraulic continuity between root and soil in drying soils, hereby reducing the drop in matric potential at the root-soil interface and enhancing soil-plant hydraulic conductance of tomato under edaphic stress. Future studies will investigate the role of AMF on soil-plant hydraulic conductance and plant water status among diverse plant species growing in contrasting soil textures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document