On the theory of the multiple scattering in an inhomogeneous medium

1966 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 510-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. P. Kalaschnikov
Keyword(s):  
Inhomogeneous Medium ◽  
Multiple Scattering

Ponderomotive action of light in the problem of multiple scattering of light in a randomly inhomogeneous medium

JETP Letters ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 67 (9) ◽  
pp. 635-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Skipetrov ◽  
S. S. Chesnokov ◽  
S. D. Zakharov ◽  
M. A. Kazaryan ◽  
V. A. Shcheglov
Keyword(s):  
Inhomogeneous Medium ◽  
Multiple Scattering ◽  
Scattering Of Light ◽  
Multiple Scattering Of Light

Analysis of STEM micrographs of thick objects

1978 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-107
Author(s):  
S. Golladay
Keyword(s):  
Inelastic Scattering ◽  
Multiple Scattering ◽  
Mass Distribution ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Phase Contrast ◽  
Image Point ◽  
Contrast Effects ◽  
Total Cross Sections ◽  
Elastic And Inelastic Scattering

The theory of multiple scattering has been worked out by Groves and comparisons have been made between predicted and observed signals for thick specimens observed in a STEM under conditions where phase contrast effects are unimportant. Independent measurements of the collection efficiencies of the two STEM detectors, calculations of the ratio σe/σi = R, where σe, σi are the total cross sections for elastic and inelastic scattering respectively, and a model of the unknown mass distribution are needed for these comparisons. In this paper an extension of this work will be described which allows the determination of the required efficiencies, R, and the unknown mass distribution from the data without additional measurements or models. Essential to the analysis is the fact that in a STEM two or more signal measurements can be made simultaneously at each image point.

Background Fitting in the Low-Loss Region of Electron Energy Loss Spectra

1990 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-57
Author(s):  
C P Scott ◽  
A J Craven ◽  
C J Gilmore ◽  
A W Bowen
Keyword(s):  
Energy Loss ◽  
Multiple Scattering ◽  
Simple Form ◽  
Single Scattering ◽  
Low Loss ◽  
Characteristic Energy ◽  
Normal Method ◽  
Fitting In ◽  
Electron Energy Loss ◽  
Electron Energy Loss Spectra

The normal method of background subtraction in quantitative EELS analysis involves fitting an expression of the form I=AE-r to an energy window preceding the edge of interest; E is energy loss, A and r are fitting parameters. The calculated fit is then extrapolated under the edge, allowing the required signal to be extracted. In the case where the characteristic energy loss is small (E < 100eV), the background does not approximate to this simple form. One cause of this is multiple scattering. Even if the effects of multiple scattering are removed by deconvolution, it is not clear that the background from the recovered single scattering distribution follows this simple form, and, in any case, deconvolution can introduce artefacts.The above difficulties are particularly severe in the case of Al-Li alloys, where the Li K edge at ~52eV overlaps the Al L2,3 edge at ~72eV, and sharp plasmon peaks occur at intervals of ~15eV in the low loss region. An alternative background fitting technique, based on the work of Zanchi et al, has been tested on spectra taken from pure Al films, with a view to extending the analysis to Al-Li alloys.

MULTIPLE SCATTERING EFFECTS IN THE COBALT K-EDGE EXAFS OF METAL CARBONYL COMPLEXES

1986 ◽  
Vol 47 (C8) ◽  
pp. C8-589-C8-592
Author(s):  
N. BINSTED ◽  
S. L. COOK ◽  
J. EVANS ◽  
R. J. PRICE ◽  
G. N. GREAVES
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Scattering ◽  
Metal Carbonyl ◽  
Carbonyl Complexes ◽  
Metal Carbonyl Complexes ◽  
Scattering Effects ◽  
Multiple Scattering Effects
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document