An economic analysis of potential rotation crops for Maine potato cropping systems

2005 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Halloran ◽  
T. S. Griffin ◽  
C. W. Honeycutt
Author(s):  
Robert P. Larkin

Crop rotations and the inclusion of cover crops and green manures are primary tools in the sustainable management of soil-borne diseases in crop production systems. Crop rotations can reduce soil-borne disease through three general mechanisms: (1) serving as a break in the host-pathogen cycle; (2) by altering the soil physical, chemical, or biological characteristics to stimulate microbial activity and diversity; or (3) directly inhibiting pathogens through the release of suppressive or toxic compounds or the enhancement of specific antagonists. Brassicas, sudangrass, and related plant types are disease-suppressive crops well-known for their biofumigation potential but also have other effects on soil microbiology that are important in disease suppression. The efficacy of rotations for reducing soil-borne diseases is dependent on several factors, including crop type, rotation length, rotation sequence, and use of the crop (as full-season rotation, cover crop, or green manure). Years of field research with Brassica and non-Brassica rotation crops in potato cropping systems in Maine have documented the efficacy of Brassica green manures for the reduction of multiple soil-borne diseases. However, they have also indicated that these crops can provide disease control even when not incorporated as green manures and that other non-biofumigant crops (such as barley, ryegrass, and buckwheat) can also be effective in disease suppression. In general, all crops provided better disease control when used as green manure vs. as a cover crop, but the addition of a cover crop can improve control provided by most rotation crops. In long-term cropping system trials, rotations incorporating multiple soil health management practices, such as longer rotations, disease-suppressive rotation crops, cover crops, and green manures, and/or organic amendments have resulted in greater yield and microbial activity and fewer disease problems than standard rotations. These results indicate that improved cropping systems may enhance productivity, sustainability, and economic viability.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 539
Author(s):  
S. S. Walia ◽  
Satpal Singh ◽  
R. S. Gill ◽  
C. S. Aulakh ◽  
Navdeep Kaur

Horticulturae ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Larkin ◽  
Ryan Lynch

Soilborne diseases are persistent problems in potato production, resulting in reductions in tuber quality and yield. Brassica rotation crops may reduce soilborne potato diseases, but how to best utilize Brassica crops in potato cropping systems has not been established. In this research, two two-year trials were established at three different sites with histories of soilborne diseases, and up to six different Brassica crops (canola, winter rapeseed, yellow and brown condiment mustards, oriental mustard, oilseed radish, and a mustard blend) and standard rotation crops (ryegrass and buckwheat) were evaluated as rotation and green manure crops. Tuber yield did not vary substantially among the rotation crops, but rotation treatments significantly affected incidence and severity of soilborne diseases at all sites. However, results were variable among sites and years. Perennial ryegrass and mustard blend rotations reduced powdery scab disease by 31–55% relative to other rotations in the only field where powdery scab was a serious problem. Mustard blend, ryegrass, and other Brassica rotations also reduced common scab, silver scurf, and black scurf at various sites, but not consistently at all sites. At one site, mustard blend and barley/ryegrass rotations reduced black scurf (by 21–58%) and common scab (by 13–34%) relative to no rotation. Overall, disease control was not correlated with biofumigation potential or rotation crop biomass production. Although both Brassica and non-Brassica rotations provided disease reduction in potato cropping systems, no single rotation crop performed consistently better than several others.


2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Halloran ◽  
Robert P. Larkin ◽  
C. Wayne Honeycutt

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 312-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pa Pa Win ◽  
Pyone Pyone Kyi ◽  
Zin Thu Zar Maung ◽  
Yi Yi Myint ◽  
Ma. Teodora Nadong Cabasan ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke A. Farno ◽  
Lewis H. Edwards ◽  
Kent Keim ◽  
Francis M. Epplin

2001 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 1296-1304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas D. Parsch ◽  
Terry C. Keisling ◽  
Patricia A. Sauer ◽  
Lawrence R. Oliver ◽  
Nathan S. Crabtree

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document