Accurate assessment of the brake torque on a rope-braked cycle ergometer

2004 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. S. Gordon ◽  
K. L. Franklin ◽  
J. Baker ◽  
B. Davies
Keyword(s):  
Cycle Ergometer ◽  
Accurate Assessment ◽  
Brake Torque

Accurate assessment of work done and power during a Wingate anaerobic test

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn L. Franklin ◽  
Rae S. Gordon ◽  
Julien S. Baker ◽  
Bruce Davies
Keyword(s):  
Traditional Method ◽  
Cycle Ergometer ◽  
Moment Of Inertia ◽  
Accurate Assessment ◽  
Wingate Anaerobic Test ◽  
Brake Torque ◽  
Physiological Studies ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Work Done ◽  
Anaerobic Test

A Monark cycle ergometer is used in physiological studies to measure work done and power. In this paper, the accuracy of a Monark rope-braked cycle ergometer was examined for a Wingate anaerobic test (WAnT). The traditional method of determining brake torque fails to take into account rope-brake theory and, as the brake torque is used to determine the moment of inertia of the flywheel, a second error is introduced into the calculation to determine the work done or power. In this study, the rope tensions were measured to determine the actual brake torque. A deceleration test was carried out to determine the moment of inertia of the system. The work done by subjects of different masses was calculated for various accelerations and it was found that the traditional calculations overestimate work done and power by between 12% and 14.7%.

Exercise in intensive care units, safety and hemodynamic monitoring

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Giulliano Gardenghi
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Hemodynamic Monitoring ◽  
Artificial Respiration ◽  
Exercise Physiology ◽  
Ventilatory Support ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Cycle Ergometer ◽  
Search Terms

Introduction: Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) have several deleterious effects of immobilization, including weakness acquired in the ICU. Exercise appears as an alternative for early mobilization in these patients. Objective: This work aims to highlight the hemodynamic repercussions and the applicability of exercise in the ICU. Methods: An integrative literature review was carried out, with articles published between 2010 and 2018, in the Lilacs, PubMed and Scielo databases, using the following search terms: exercise, cycle ergometer, intensive care units, early mobilization, mechanical ventilation, artificial respiration. Results: 13 articles were included, addressing hemodynamic monitoring and the role of exercise as early mobilization, with or without ventilatory support. The exercise sessions were feasible and safe within the ICU environment. Conclusion: Physical exercise can be performed safely in an ICU environment, if respecting a series of criteria such as those presented here. It is important that the assistant professional seeks to prescribe interventions based on Exercise Physiology that can positively intervene in the functional prognosis in critically ill patients.Keywords: exercise, intensive care units, patient safety.

Multiple Sclerosis: Treadmill Versus Cycle Ergometry Maximal Exercise Test Responses

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 113-117
Author(s):  
Garett Griffith ◽  
Badeia Saed ◽  
Tracy Baynard
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Aerobic Capacity ◽  
Work Capacity ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cycle Ergometer ◽  
Cycle Ergometry ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Complete Test ◽  
Peak Aerobic Capacity ◽  
Predicted Values

ABSTRACT Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease that impacts the central nervous system. MS generally results in decreased mobility and work capacity. Our objective was to determine exercise testing responses on both a treadmill and cycle ergometer among individuals with MS who were able to ambulate freely. Methods: Twenty-six individuals with MS participated in a cross-sectional study (44 ± 11 years; body mass index 26.8 ± 6.2 kg·m−2; expanded disability scale score 3.1 ± 0.9), with 24 individuals with complete test data for both treadmill and cycle ergometry tests. Peak aerobic capacity (VO2peak) for both treadmill and cycle ergometry tests were measured with indirect calorimetry. Results: Participants safely completed both treadmill and cycle ergometry tests, and treadmill testing yielded higher values (26.7 ± 6.4 mL·kg−1·min−1) compared with cycle ergometry (23.7 ± 5.7 mL·kg−1·min−1), with values ~12% greater for treadmill. When comparing tests to their respected predicted values within modality, treadmill tests were 8% lower and cycle ergometry tests were 10% lower than predicted. Conclusions: While peak aerobic capacity was very low for this population, treadmill tests were still higher than cycle ergometry data, with this difference between modes being similar to that observed in healthy adult populations. Additional research is required to determine if these findings are impacted by participation in physical activity or regular exercise.

Development and Assessment of the Monark Cycle Ergometer for Anaerobic Muscular Exercise

1983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank A. Frederick ◽  
Richard C. Langevin ◽  
Jose Miletti ◽  
Michael Sacco ◽  
Michelle M. Murphy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cycle Ergometer ◽  
Muscular Exercise
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document