Designing with scenarios: A critical review of current research and practice

1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Despina Filippidou
Keyword(s):  
Critical Review ◽  
Research And Practice

A critical review of research and practice in data-driven learning (DDL) in the academic writing classroom

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meilin Chen ◽  
John Flowerdew
Keyword(s):  
Academic Writing ◽  
Critical Review ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Language Education ◽  
English For Academic Purposes ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Research Progress ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Year 2000

Abstract Since the late 1980s, there has been a growing interest in the direct application of corpora, or data-driven learning (DDL), in language education. This relatively novel teaching approach has been particularly applied in the teaching and learning of English for Academic Purposes (EAP)/academic writing, especially since the turn of the century. This paper synthesizes and evaluates the research progress in the field of EAP/academic writing since the year 2000 by critically reviewing 37 empirical studies focussing on applications of DDL in this context. Based on the critical review and a discussion of some contentious issues, a set of five recommendations for the way forward in DDL research and practice for EAP/academic writing is presented.

Leadership Paradigms in Construction: Critical Review to Inform Research and Practice

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 02517001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise R. Simmons ◽  
Nicholas A. Clegorne ◽  
Tinesha Woods-Wells
Keyword(s):  
Critical Review ◽  
Research And Practice

scholarly journals A Critical Review of Theory in Social Work Journals: A Replication Study

10.18060/132 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn S. Gentle-Genitty ◽  
Virgil Gregory ◽  
Corey Pfahler ◽  
Misty Thomas ◽  
Lisa Lewis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Work ◽  
Social Workers ◽  
Critical Review ◽  
Theory Development ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Social Work Research ◽  
Quality Ratings ◽  
Quality Scale

The purpose of this paper is multifold.Key aspects discussed include exploring the extent of theory discussion and progression in social work journals for the year 2004; discussing the necessity of theory in social work research and practice; reviewing previous research literature regarding evaluation of theory discussion and progression; proposing criteria for defining theory in social work journals; and presenting findings from the current study concerning theory discussion and progression in social work journals. Results: Of the 1,168 articles reviewed from 37 journals, 71 (approximately 6%) met the criteria for theory development with empirical base. Thus, a minimal number of articles (3 out of 71 or 4.2%) evaluated, based on the criteria in the theory quality scale (Table 1), received high quality ratings. Conclusion: Based on the results yielded by the analysis, we assert that social workers need to make a conscious effort to include theory in practice decisions.

scholarly journals A critical review of the developments in building adaptability

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 284-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Heidrich ◽  
John Kamara ◽  
Sebastiano Maltese ◽  
Fulvio Re Cecconi ◽  
Mario Claudio Dejaco
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Critical Review ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Building Design ◽  
Design Criterion ◽  
Design Stage ◽  
Research Issues ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Current State

Purpose This paper provides a critical review of developments in the adaptability of buildings. The purpose of this paper is to determine the current “state-of-the-art”, describe current thinking and trends in research and practice, and identify issues and gaps that further research can address. It provides a basis for a scientific and practical understanding of the interdependencies across different design criterion. This paper increases the awareness of architects, engineers, clients and users on the importance of adaptability and its role in lowering impacts over the lifecycle of buildings as part of the infrastructure system. Design/methodology/approach This paper draws mainly from the literature as its source of evidence. These were identified from established databases and search engines (e.g. Scopus, ISI Web of Knowledge and Google Scholar) using keywords such as adaptability, adaptable, adaptation, and flexibility. Over 80 sources including books, journal papers, conference proceedings, research reports and doctoral theses covering the period 1990 to 2017 were reviewed and categorised. An inductive approach was used to critically review and categorise these publications and develop a framework for analysis. Findings The concept of adaptability includes many dimensions which can broadly fall into two categories: changes to buildings and user adaptations to buildings. However, previous research has mostly focussed on the former, with many attempts to identify building attributes that facilitate adaptability, and some considerations for its assessment. Key areas that have not been adequately addressed and which require further research include: user/occupant adaptations, cost, benefits and implications of various adaptability measures, and the development of a standardised assessment methodology that could aid in decision making in the design stage of buildings. Research limitations/implications The adaptability strategies considered in this review focussed mainly on building components and systems, and did not include the contribution of intelligent and smart/biological systems. The coverage is further limited in scope due to the period considered (1990-2017) and the exclusion of terms such as “retrofit” and “refurbishment” from the review. However, the findings provide a solid basis for further research in the areas identified above. It identifies research issues and gaps in knowledge between the defined needs and current state-of-the-art on adaptive building for both research and practice. Originality/value This paper is a review of research into a highly topical subject, given the acknowledged need to adapt buildings over their lifecycle to environmental, economic or social changes. It provides further insights on the dimensions of adaptability and identifies areas for further research that will contribute to the development of robust tools for the assessment of building adaptability, which will enhance the decision-making process of building design and the development of a more sustainable built environment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document