Ownership structure and post-issue operating performance of firms conducting seasoned equity offerings in Thailand

2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piman Limpaphayom ◽  
Anchalee Ngamwutikul
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Seasoned Equity Offerings ◽  
Equity Offerings

scholarly journals The Effects of Operational Structure Change on Performance after Seasoned Equity Offerings

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chihyoun Ahn ◽  
Mi-Ok Kim ◽  
Hyung-Rok Jung
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Seasoned Equity Offerings ◽  
Structure Change ◽  
Equity Offerings ◽  
Price Response ◽  
Sustainability Strategy ◽  
Rate Of Increase ◽  
Operational Structure

Sustainability is directly linked to firms’ survival in competitive markets. To survive, firms need extra capital, and seasoned equity offerings (SEOs) are one sustainability strategy. Additional resources from SEOs leads to changes in firms’ operational structure, which brings future sustainability. This study investigates whether there is sustainability in firms’ operational structure and the effects of sustainable development on operational performance and market reaction. We measure the operational structure change of firms as three proxies: 1) the rate of increase in the number of operating segments, 2) the Berry–Herfindahl index using the ratio of sales of each operating segment out of total sales, and 3) the size of net investment in plant and equipment. Our results show that operational structure change has a statistically significant and positive correlation with long-term operating performance. In addition, there is no significant stock price response at first, but the operating performance in the next term is perceived as a favorable factor after 3 years. The results show that there are different responses in the stock market toward operational structure change. The empirical results confirm that firms with SEO have sustainable development in operational structure and that markets recognize firms’ sustainability strategy arising from SEOs.

The long run performance of secondary equity offerings on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1211-1232
Author(s):  
Jesse Alves da Cunha ◽  
Yudhvir Seetharam
Keyword(s):  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Investor Sentiment ◽  
Seasoned Equity Offerings ◽  
Equity Offerings ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Market Participants ◽  
Johannesburg Stock Exchange ◽  
Long Run ◽  
The Impact

Purpose Opinions have been divided on whether there is a rational explanation to the reason behind seasoned equity offerings (SEOs) or whether the explanation lies within the behavioural intricacies attributed to stock market participants. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This study investigates the long-run performance of firms conducting SEOs on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) over the period of 1998–2015, by examining the return performance and operating performance of firms, along with the impact of investor sentiment on these variables. Findings The results of this study are inconsistent with the existing literature, which argues that the long-run performance of issuing firms signalled an initial underreaction to SEOs buoyed by over-optimistic investors. Research limitations/implications Instead, the long-run performance of issuing firms is adequately explained by the rational models centred on the risk-return framework, implying that investors are reacting swiftly to SEOs in an unbiased fashion. Originality/value Investor sentiment does not materially influence the long-run share performance or operating performance of issuing firms, casting doubt on the ability of the market timing theory to explain the long-run performance of SEOs. The authors thus find that SEO performance cannot be explained by behavioural-based reasoning, in contrast to some asset pricing studies on the JSE which indicate the role of sentiment in explaining returns.

Anomalous Evidence on Operating Performance Following Seasoned Equity Offerings: The Case of REITs

2000 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 76 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Swint Friday ◽  
Shawn D. Howton ◽  
Shelly W. Howton
Keyword(s):  
Operating Performance ◽  
Seasoned Equity Offerings ◽  
Equity Offerings

scholarly journals The Effects of Operational Structure Change on Performance after Seasoned Equity Offerings

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chihyoun Ahn ◽  
Mi-Ok Kim ◽  
Hyung-Rok Jung
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Seasoned Equity Offerings ◽  
Structure Change ◽  
Equity Offerings ◽  
Price Response ◽  
Sustainability Strategy ◽  
Rate Of Increase ◽  
Operational Structure

Sustainability is directly linked to firms’ survival in competitive markets. To survive, firms need extra capital, and seasoned equity offerings (SEOs) are one sustainability strategy. Additional resources from SEOs leads to changes in firms’ operational structure, which brings future sustainability. This study investigates whether there is sustainability in firms’ operational structure and the effects of sustainable development on operational performance and market reaction. We measure the operational structure change of firms as three proxies: 1) the rate of increase in the number of operating segments, 2) the Berry–Herfindahl index using the ratio of sales of each operating segment out of total sales, and 3) the size of net investment in plant and equipment. Our results show that operational structure change has a statistically significant and positive correlation with long-term operating performance. In addition, there is no significant stock price response at first, but the operating performance in the next term is perceived as a favorable factor after 3 years. The results show that there are different responses in the stock market toward operational structure change. The empirical results confirm that firms with SEO have sustainable development in operational structure and that markets recognize firms’ sustainability strategy arising from SEOs.

scholarly journals Operating Performance of the Firms Issuing Equity through Rights Offer

2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 25-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
P J Jijo Lukose ◽  
S Narayan Rao
Keyword(s):  
Operating Performance ◽  
Seasoned Equity Offerings ◽  
Equity Offerings ◽  
Equity Issue ◽  
Equity Issues ◽  
Foreign Companies ◽  
Market Participants ◽  
Information Hypothesis ◽  
Run Up ◽  
Finance Theory

Rights equity issue is one of the most common methods for subsequent equity issue in the Indian market. In rights offer, current shareholders are given short-term warrants on a pro-rata basis with the option to either purchase the new shares or sell the warrants in the market before expiration. Rights equity issue can be a potential solution to the adverse selection problem associated with capital issue and has comparatively low direct costs. In this paper, the authors analyse the operating performance of the BSE- listed manufacturing firms following rights equity issue and their linkages with firm-specific characteristics as hypothesized in the finance theory. They have selected 392 rights equity issues during the period 1991-2000 and used a methodology robust to the mean-reverting nature of accounting income. Consistent with empirical results for seasoned equity offerings in the US market, there is a statistically significant decline in the operating performance after the rights equity issue. This decline in performance is more severe for big firms, low market-to-book value firms, and firms with lower directors' holdings. Interestingly, foreign companies and companies belonging to small business groups do not show any declining trend. The authors find that the decline in perform- ance is due to the inefficiency in utilization of assets and not due to decrease in profit margins. Further, various proxies measuring market valuation also decline during the post-issue period after a run up in the pre-issue period. The results of the study suggest that over-investment hypothesis and agency models can better explain the decline in performance compared to asymmetric information hypothesis. The results also indicate that rights equity issues are not simple de-leveraging decisions. These findings have implications for several groups of capital market participants and the authors conclude with specific guidelines for them which are as follows: The investing public and analyst who are too optimistic about the issuers should consider deteriorating performance while arriving at the valuations. Investors should be vigilant about the ‘empire building’ implications of increased investments through rights issue. Optimistic managers should reassess the investment opportunities and have con-servative plans before approaching the market. The policy makers and regulators should come out with better regulatory framework to control and penalize the opportunistic managers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document