Stimulus significance effects in habituation of the phasic and tonic orienting reflex

2004 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 166-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Barry
1972 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 195-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Yaremko ◽  
Kenneth Keleman
Keyword(s):  

1972 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-110
Author(s):  
Phillip Kleespies ◽  
Morton Wiener

This study explored (1) for evidence of visual input at so-called “subliminal” exposure durations, and (2) whether the response, if any, was a function of the thematic content of the stimulus. Thematic content (threatening versus non-threatening) and stimulus structure (angular versus curved) were varied independently under “subliminal,” “part-cue,” and “identification” exposure conditions. With Ss' reports and the frequency and latency of first eye movements (“orienting reflex”) as input indicators, there was no evidence of input differences which are a function of thematic content at any exposure duration, and the “report” data were consistent with the eye-movement data.


Author(s):  
Michael Gabriel ◽  
Edward Orona ◽  
Kent Foster ◽  
Richard W. Lambert

1980 ◽  
Vol 11 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 274-275
Author(s):  
M. Kuiack ◽  
D.A.T. Siddle ◽  
R.E. Remington
Keyword(s):  

1980 ◽  
Vol 11 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 306-307
Author(s):  
H.D. Kimmel
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document