scholarly journals Experimental and finite element analysis of fracture criterion in general yielding fracture mechanics

Sadhana ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 631-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Kulkarni ◽  
Ravi Prakash ◽  
A. N. Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Fracture Criterion ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
General Yielding ◽  
General Yielding Fracture Mechanics

scholarly journals Finite Element Analysis of Bore-expanding Processes with Ductile Fracture Criterion

1998 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirohiko TAKUDA ◽  
Ken-ichiro MORI ◽  
Masashi KANESHIRO ◽  
Natsuo HATTA
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Ductile Fracture ◽  
Fracture Criterion ◽  
Ductile Fracture Criterion ◽  
Element Analysis

Development of the Next-Generation Computational Fracture Mechanics Simulator on the Earth Simulator 2

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaworu Yodo ◽  
Hiroshi Kawai ◽  
Hiroshi Okada ◽  
Masao Ogino ◽  
Ryuji Shioya
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Intensity Factors ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Mechanics Analysis ◽  
Analysis System

Fracture mechanics analysis using the finite element method has been one of the key methodologies to evaluate structural integrity for aging infrastructures such as aircraft, ship, power plants, etc. However, three-dimensional crack analyses for structures with highly complex three-dimensional shapes have not widely been used, because of many technical difficulties such as the lack of enough computational power. The authors have been developing a fracture mechanics analysis system that can deal with arbitrary shaped cracks in three-dimensional structures. The system consists of mesh generation software, a finite element analysis program and a fracture mechanics module. In our system, a Virtual Crack Closure-Integral Method (VCCM) for the quadratic tetrahedral finite elements is adopted to evaluate the stress intensity factors. This system can perform the three-dimensional fracture analyses. Fatigue and SCC crack propagation analyses with more than one cracks of arbitrary complicated shapes and orientations. The rate and direction of crack propagation are predicted by using appropriate formulae based on the stress intensity factors. When the fracture mechanics analysis system is applied to the complex shaped aging structures with the cracks which are modeled explicitly, the size of finite element analysis tends to be very large. Therefore, a large scale parallel structural analysis code is required. We also have been developing an open-source CAE system, ADVENTURE. It is based on the hierarchical domain decomposition method (HDDM) with the balancing domain decomposition (BDD) pre-conditioner. A general-purpose parallel structural analysis solver, ADVENTURE_Solid is one of the solver modules of the ADVENTURE system. In this paper, we combined VCCM for the tetrahedral finite element with ADVENTURE system and large-scale fracture analyses are fully automated. They are performed using the massively parallel super computer ES2 (Earth Simulator 2) which is owned and run by JAMSTEC (Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology).

Fracture Mechanics Fatigue Evaluation of a Flowline Clamp Connector Using Finite Element Modeling of a Crack

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis Sifford ◽  
Ali Shirani
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Fatigue Life ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Crack Tip ◽  
Element Analysis

Abstract This paper presents the application of the rules from ASME Section VIII, Division 3 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for a fracture mechanics evaluation to determine the damage tolerance and fatigue life of a flowline clamp connector. The guidelines from API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1 Fitness-For-Service for the stress analysis of a crack-like flaw have been considered for this assessment. The crack tip is modeled using a refined mesh around the crack tip that is referred to as a focused mesh approach in API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1. The driving force method is used as an alternative to the failure assessment diagram method to account for the influence of crack tip plasticity. The J integral is determined using elastic-plastic finite element analysis and converted to an equivalent stress intensity factor to be compared to the fracture toughness of the material. The fatigue life is calculated using the Paris Law equation and the stress intensity factor calculated from the finite element analysis. The allowable number of design cycles is determined using the safety factors required from Division 3 of the ASME Pressure Vessel Code.

Fracture Mechanics Fatigue Evaluation of a Flowline Clamp Connector Using Finite Element Modeling of a Crack

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis Sifford ◽  
Ali Shirani
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Fatigue Life ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Crack Tip ◽  
Element Analysis

This paper presents the application of the rules from ASME Section VIII, Division 3 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for a fracture mechanics evaluation to determine the damage tolerance and fatigue life of a flowline clamp connector. The guidelines from API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1 Fitness-For-Service for the stress analysis of a crack-like flaw have been considered for this assessment. The crack tip is modeled using a refined mesh around the crack tip that is referred to as a focused mesh approach in API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1. The driving force method is used as an alternative to the failure assessment diagram method to account for the influence of crack tip plasticity. The J integral is determined using elastic-plastic finite element analysis and converted to an equivalent stress intensity factor to be compared to the fracture toughness of the material. The fatigue life is calculated using the Paris Law equation and the stress intensity factor calculated from the finite element analysis. The allowable number of design cycles is determined using the safety factors required from Division 3 of the ASME Pressure Vessel Code.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document