The orthographic code: Developmental trends in reading-disabled and normally-achieving children

1991 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 178-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven G. Zecker
1991 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn S. Snyder ◽  
Doris M. Downey

In this study, the word retrieval, phonological awareness, sentence completion, and narrative discourse processing skills of 93 reading-disabled and 93 normally achieving subjects from 8 to 14 years of age were compared. The subjects were matched for age, sex, and neighborhood. Results revealed that the two groups differed significantly on the time and accuracy of word retrieval, their ability to produce a syntactically appropriate structure in a sentence completion task, their retelling of stories that had been read to them, their answers to questions about the stories, and their inferences. Further analysis revealed that the variance in the younger reading-disabled children’s reading comprehension scores was best accounted for by their performance on the sentence completion and word retrieval measures; the inferencing skills of the older reading-disabled children best accounted for the variance in their reading comprehension. By contrast, the younger normally achieving children’s reading comprehension scores were best accounted for by their sentence completion, the proportion of the stories that they retold, and word retrieval scores. The proportion of stories retold and the phonological awareness score of the older normally achieving children best accounted for the variance in their reading scores. These findings suggest that the oral language skills of normally achieving and reading-disabled children may relate differently to their reading comprehension at different age levels.


1992 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty U. Watson

Recent research has suggested that deficits in several metalinguistic/phonological abilities, such as short-term verbal memory and phoneme segmentation, may be etiologic factors in specific reading disability, and it has been speculated that these weaknesses may result from a more fundamental deficit in the processing of temporal, auditory stimuli. This study examined the auditory temporal processing skills of reading-disabled, math-disabled, and normally achieving college students. The math-disabled group was included to control for the possibility that poor temporal processing is a "marker" variable for learning disability rather than being related specifically to reading disability. Subjects were assessed on a battery of psychophysical tasks that included five tests of temporal processing. The reading-disabled group performed significantly more poorly on the temporal tasks but performed as well as the other groups on the simple pitch and loudness discrimination tasks. In spite of the significant difference on the temporal tasks, the majority of reading-disabled subjects performed within the same range as the subjects in the other two groups, and there were also some normally reading subjects who performed poorly on the temporal processing tasks. These findings suggest that poor temporal processing is neither a necessary nor a sufficient cause of reading disability, but that there is a modest association between the two domains.


1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMIE L. METSALA

Reading-disabled children display a phonemic awareness deficit when compared with normally achieving children matched for word reading ability. However, previous research has not examined phonemic awareness deficits in reading-disabled children when compared with children matched on pseudoword reading. This article examines phonemic awareness ability in both a traditional design and a pseudoword reading level match design. The results show that a group of reading-disabled children who show typical pseudoword reading and phonemic awareness deficits in the traditional reading level match design nonetheless have phonemic awareness skills commensurate with their level of pseudoword reading ability.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Landi ◽  
W. Einar Mencl ◽  
Stephen J. Frost ◽  
Rebecca Sandak ◽  
Helen Chen ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Abigail Raikes ◽  
JoAnn L. Robinson ◽  
Robert H. Bradley ◽  
Helen H. Raikes ◽  
Catherine C. Ayoub

1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Patton ◽  
Donald K. Routh ◽  
Stuart I. Offenbach

2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Schneider ◽  
Mechtild Visé ◽  
Kathrin Lockl ◽  
Thomas O Nelson

1983 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rochelle B. Simms ◽  
W. Donald Crump

Syntax is a crucial component of oral language development. Frequently, learning disabled children's oral language development is characterized by syntax problems. Hence, since deviations in oral language development may form the basis for identification of learning disabilities, adequate indices of oral language development are needed. The purpose of this study was to explore two indices of syntactic development in oral language, the T-unit and the Syntactic Density Score. Learning disabled students and a matched group of normally achieving peers were compared on these indices at four age levels. Results are reported for each measure along with a discussion and implications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document