Emergency radiology credentialing examination: 4 years’ experience

1995 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noel Nathanson
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Radiology ◽  
Credentialing Examination

Trauma and Emergency Radiology

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. i
Author(s):  
Stephan W. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Radiology

scholarly journals The triple rule out CT in acute chest pain: a challenge for emergency radiologists?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Russo ◽  
Camilla Sportoletti ◽  
Giulia Scalas ◽  
Domenico Attinà ◽  
Francesco Buia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chest Pain ◽  
Emergency Radiology ◽  
Acute Chest Pain ◽  
Radiology Workflow ◽  
Radiology Department ◽  
Atypical Chest Pain ◽  
Triple Rule Out ◽  
Good Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Rule Out ◽  
Ct Studies

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of triple rule out computed tomography (TRO-CT) in an emergency radiology workflow by comparing the diagnostic performance of cardiovascular and general radiologists in the interpretation of emergency TRO-CT studies in patients with acute and atypical chest pain. Methods Between July 2017 and December 2019, 350 adult patients underwent TRO-CT studies for the assessment of atypical chest pain. Three radiologists with different fields and years of expertise (a cardioradiologist—CR, an emergency senior radiologist—SER, and an emergency junior radiologist—JER) retrospectively and independently reviewed all TRO-CT studies, by trans-axial and multiplanar reconstruction only. Concordance rates were then calculated using as reference blinded results from a different senior cardioradiologist, who previously evaluated studies using all available analysis software. Results Concordance rate was 100% for acute aortic syndrome (AAS) and pulmonary embolism (PE). About coronary stenosis (CS) for non-obstructive (<50%), CS concordance rates were 97.98%, 90.91%, and 97.18%, respectively, for CR, SER, and JER; for obstructive CS (>50%), concordance rates were respectively 88%, 85.7%, and 71.43%. Moreover, it was globally observed a better performance in the evaluation of last half of examinations compared with the first one. Conclusions Our study confirm the feasibility of the TRO-CT even in an Emergency Radiology department that cannot rely on a 24/7 availability of a dedicated skilled cardiovascular radiologist. The “undedicated” radiologists could exclude with good diagnostic accuracy the presence of obstructive stenosis, those with a clinical impact on patient management, without needing time-consuming software and/or reconstructions.

scholarly journals Impact of an in-house emergency radiologist on report turnaround time

CJEM ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Lamb ◽  
Paria Kashani ◽  
John Ryan ◽  
Guy Hebert ◽  
Adnan Sheikh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Emergency Radiology ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Turnaround Time ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Radiology Resident ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Patient Disposition ◽  
Report Turnaround Time

AbstractBackgroundOne of the many challenges facing emergency departments (EDs) across North America is timely access to emergency radiology services. Academic institutions, which are typically also regional referral centres, frequently require cross-sectional studies to be performed 24 hours a day with expedited final reports to accelerate patient care and ED flow.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine if the presence of an in-house radiologist, in addition to a radiology resident dedicated to the ED, had a significant impact on report turnaround time.MethodsPreliminary and final report turnaround times, provided by the radiology resident and staff, respectively, for patients undergoing computed tomography or ultrasonography of their abdomen/pelvis in 2008 (before the implementation of emergency radiology in-house staff service) were compared to those performed during the same time frame in 2009 and 2010 (after staffing protocols were changed).ResultsA total of 1,624 reports were reviewed. Overall, there was no statistically significant decrease in the preliminary report turnaround times between 2008 and 2009 (p = 0.1102), 2009 and 2010 (p = 0.6232), or 2008 and 2010 (p = 0.0890), although times consistently decreased from a median of 2.40 hours to 2.08 hours to 2.05 hours (2008 to 2009 to 2010). There was a statistically significant decrease in final report turnaround times between 2008 and 2009 (p < 0.0001), 2009 and 2010 (p < 0.0011), and 2008 and 2010 (p < 0.0001). Median final report times decreased from 5.00 hours to 3.08 hours to 2.75 hours in 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively. There was also a significant decrease in the time interval between preliminary and final reports between 2008 and 2009 (p < 0.0001) and 2008 and 2010 (p < 0.0001) but no significant change between 2009 and 2010 (p = 0.4144).ConclusionOur results indicate that the presence of a dedicated ED radiologist significantly reduces final report turnaround time and thus may positively impact the time to ED patient disposition. Patient care is improved when attending radiologists are immediately available to read complex films, both in terms of health care outcomes and regarding the need for repeat testing. Providing emergency physicians with accurate imaging findings as rapidly as possible facilitates effective and timely management and thus optimizes patient care.

BWH emergency radiology-surgical correlation: intraperitoneal urinary bladder rupture

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 713-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Landman ◽  
Bharti Khurana ◽  
Alexandra Briggs ◽  
Mark Fairweather ◽  
Zara Cooper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Bladder ◽  
Emergency Radiology ◽  
Bladder Rupture
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document