Program development and integrated treatment across systems for dual diagnosis: Mental illness, drug addiction, and alcoholism (MIDAA)

1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Sciacca ◽  
Christina M. Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Drug Addiction ◽  
Program Development ◽  
Dual Diagnosis ◽  
Integrated Treatment

Dual Diagnosis: Effective Treatment and Barriers to Recovery

2004 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 35-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine D. Palmieri ◽  
Michael P. Accordino
Keyword(s):  
Substance Abuse ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Dual Diagnosis ◽  
Integrated Treatment ◽  
Rehabilitation Counselors ◽  
Treatment Approaches ◽  
People With Mental Illness ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Substance Abuse Disorders ◽  
New Treatment

Traditional treatments for persons with serious mental illness and substance abuse disorders have historically not been fully effective. Because there is a high prevalence of substance abuse among people with mental illness, new treatment approaches have been developed to target this population specifically. Integrated approaches to treatment are considered to be more effective. In the following review of literature, the authors have described traditional treatment approaches and why they have been ineffective in facilitating recovery for individuals with dual diagnosis. Integrated treatment approaches are described and reviewed as to their efficacy in facilitating recovery and their cost-effectiveness. Characteristics of people who benefit most from integrated treatment are also presented. Finally, barriers to recovery for persons with dual diagnosis and implications for Rehabilitation Counselors are also examined.

The Concept of the Psychopath

1960 ◽  
Vol 106 (443) ◽  
pp. 537-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Mowbray
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Drug Addiction ◽  
Social Behaviour ◽  
Mental Deficiency ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Royal Commission ◽  
Organic Disease ◽  
Sexual Offences ◽  
Social Attitude ◽  
Ability To Act

In their evidence to the recent Royal Commission on the Law Relating to Mental Illness and Mental Deficiency the R.M.P.A. stated the problem of the psychopath in terms of delinquent or otherwise anti-social behaviour. After eliminating cases where such behaviour resulted from well-recognized forms of mental illness or defect, from psychoneurosis or organic disease or injury, their Memorandum went on to say that there remained a group of patients “whose daily behaviour shows a want of social responsibility and of consideration for others, of prudence and foresight and of ability to act in their own best interests. Their persistent anti-social mode of conduct may include inefficiency and lack of interest in any form of occupation; pathological lying, swindling and slandering; alcoholism and drug addiction, sexual offences, and violent actions with little motivation and an entire absence of self-restraint, which may go as far as homicide. Punishment, or the threat of punishment, influences their behaviour only momentarily and its more lasting effect is to intensify their vindictiveness and anti-social attitude.”

scholarly journals Dual Diagnosis as a Tool for Therapists and Social Workers

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Andrzej Lipczyński ◽  
Jarosław Kinal ◽  
Institute of Sociology University of Rzeszow
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Severe Mental Illness ◽  
Social Workers ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Dual Diagnosis ◽  
Mentally Ill ◽  
Psychiatric Patients ◽  
Bipolar Affective Disorder ◽  
Psychoactive Substances

The problem of dual diagnosis described as the first in Poland Lehmann in 1993. He noticed that for people with dual diagnosis is needed different diagnostic and therapeutic-specific approach and that social services (Lehman, 2000; Le hman 1993; Lehman, Myers 1994). Clinical experience suggests the need for a clear separation of this group of patients from both patients and the mentally ill odwykowo. T HAT approach allows to carry out homogeneous diagnostic psychiatric patients. Such ayodrębnienie It is dictated by the difficulties of diagnostic and therapeutic (Siegfried 1998; Sciacca 1991; Lehman, 1998). One clinical term for such a diverse group of patients do not permit a homogeneous diagnostic tests and determine the needs, problems and medical treatment and social services. Interest in this group of patients is not only due to cognitive reasons, but also due to the increasing number of people with dual diagnosis, more effective treatment and social assistance. Another reason is the rapidly growing number of people with PD. This group represents a challenge for physicians, social workers (Crome, Myton 2004; Lehman 2000; Alaja, Sepia1998).Clinical studies confirm the phenomenon of interactivity in which a mentally ill person is at high risk of developing mood-dependent dependence, particularly alcohol and those who are at high risk for mental illness (Lehman 2000).Dual diagnosis is the term defining the clinical coexistence in the same person from one side of a mental disorder, and disorders related to psychoactive substances, mostly drugs and / or alcohol (Abel-Saleh 2004; Crome, Myton 2004). The population of patients with dual diagnosis is large and varies widely in type and severity of the mental illness, the type of psychoactive agents and specific disorders resulting from the adoption of psychoactive substances, psychological and social skills which is obtained support and other factors (Lehman 1996; Ridgely 1987), such as schizophrenia. Severe mental illness (severe mental illness) as a concept which takes into account the clinical diagnosis (diagnosis) the degree of impairment of (disability) and duration of disorder (duration). This criterion includes serious mental breakdowns such as schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder, depression. These disorders seriously impair people-to-people contact, self-care. Treatment of people with dual diagnosis is a problem because it results from the combination of two extremely different ways of dealing with mental illness and addiction.

scholarly journals Dual Diagnosis as a Tool for Therapists and Social Workers

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Andrzej Lipczyński ◽  
Jarosław Kinal ◽  
Institute of Sociology University of Rzeszow
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Severe Mental Illness ◽  
Social Workers ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Dual Diagnosis ◽  
Mentally Ill ◽  
Psychiatric Patients ◽  
Bipolar Affective Disorder ◽  
Psychoactive Substances

The problem of dual diagnosis described as the first in Poland Lehmann in 1993. He noticed that for people with dual diagnosis is needed different diagnostic and therapeutic-specific approach and that social services (Lehman, 2000; Le hman 1993; Lehman, Myers 1994). Clinical experience suggests the need for a clear separation of this group of patients from both patients and the mentally ill odwykowo. T HAT approach allows to carry out homogeneous diagnostic psychiatric patients. Such ayodrębnienie It is dictated by the difficulties of diagnostic and therapeutic (Siegfried 1998; Sciacca 1991; Lehman, 1998). One clinical term for such a diverse group of patients do not permit a homogeneous diagnostic tests and determine the needs, problems and medical treatment and social services. Interest in this group of patients is not only due to cognitive reasons, but also due to the increasing number of people with dual diagnosis, more effective treatment and social assistance. Another reason is the rapidly growing number of people with PD. This group represents a challenge for physicians, social workers (Crome, Myton 2004; Lehman 2000; Alaja, Sepia1998).Clinical studies confirm the phenomenon of interactivity in which a mentally ill person is at high risk of developing mood-dependent dependence, particularly alcohol and those who are at high risk for mental illness (Lehman 2000).Dual diagnosis is the term defining the clinical coexistence in the same person from one side of a mental disorder, and disorders related to psychoactive substances, mostly drugs and / or alcohol (Abel-Saleh 2004; Crome, Myton 2004). The population of patients with dual diagnosis is large and varies widely in type and severity of the mental illness, the type of psychoactive agents and specific disorders resulting from the adoption of psychoactive substances, psychological and social skills which is obtained support and other factors (Lehman 1996; Ridgely 1987), such as schizophrenia. Severe mental illness (severe mental illness) as a concept which takes into account the clinical diagnosis (diagnosis) the degree of impairment of (disability) and duration of disorder (duration). This criterion includes serious mental breakdowns such as schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder, depression. These disorders seriously impair people-to-people contact, self-care. Treatment of people with dual diagnosis is a problem because it results from the combination of two extremely different ways of dealing with mental illness and addiction.

scholarly journals Pre-Existing Mental Disorder, Clinical Profile, Inpatient Services, And Costs in People Hospitalised Following Traumatic Spinal Injury: A Population Record-Linkage Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Nicole Sharwood ◽  
Taneal Wiseman ◽  
Emma Tseris ◽  
Kate Curtis ◽  
Bharat Vaikuntam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Substance Use ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Dual Diagnosis ◽  
Record Linkage ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Spinal Injury ◽  
Linkage Study ◽  
Icd 10

IntroductionRisk of traumatic injury is increased in individuals with mental illness, substance use disorder and dual diagnosis (mental disorders); these conditions will pre-exist among individuals hospitalised with acute traumatic spinal injury (TSI). Although early intervention can improve outcomes for people who experience mental disorders or TSI, the incidence, management, and cost of this often complex comorbid health profile is not sufficiently understood. Objectives and ApproachIn a whole-population cohort of patients hospitalised with acute TSI, we aimed to describe the prevalence of pre-existing mental disorders, and compare differences in injury epidemiology, costs and inpatient allied health service access. Record-linkage study of all hospitalised cases of TSI between June 2013 and June 2016 in New South Wales, Australia. TSI was defined by specific ICD-10-AM codes. Mental disorder status was considered as pre-existing where specific ICD-10-AM codes were recorded in incident admissions. Results13,489 individuals sustained acute TSI during this study. 13.11%, 6.06%, and 1.82% had pre-existing mental illness, substance use disorder, and dual diagnosis, respectively. Individuals with mental disorder were older (p<0.001), more likely to have had a fall or self-harmed (p<0.001), experienced almost twice the length of stay and inpatient complications, and increased injury severity compared to individuals without mental disorder (p<0.001). Conclusion / ImplicationsIndividuals hospitalised for TSI with pre-existing mental disorder have greater likelihood of increased injury severity and more complex, costly acute care admissions compared to individuals without mental disorder. Care pathway optimisation including prevention of hospital acquired complications for people with pre-existing mental disorders hospitalised for TSI is warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document