Possible correlation between species extinction, evolution and plate adjustments to continental erosion

GeoJournal ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. Iberall
1989 ◽  
Vol 289 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Tardy ◽  
R. N'Kounkou ◽  
J.-L. Probst

Author(s):  
Lee Roberts ◽  
Monomita Nandy ◽  
Abeer Hassan ◽  
Suman Lodh ◽  
Ahmed A. Elamer

AbstractThis paper contributes to biodiversity and species extinction literature by examining the relationship between corporate accountability in terms of species protection and factors affecting such accountability from forward-thinking companies. We use triangulation of theories, namely deep ecology, legitimacy, and we introduce a new perspective to the stakeholder theory that considers species as a ‘stakeholder’. Using Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood (PPML) regression, we examine a sample of 200 Fortune Global companies over 3 years. Our results indicate significant positive relations between ecologically conscious companies that are accountable for the protection of biodiversity and species extinction and external assurance, environmental performance, partnerships with socially responsible organizations and awards for sustainable activities. Our empirical results appear to be robust in controlling for possible endogeneities. Our findings contribute to the discussion on the concern of species loss and habitat destruction in the context of corporate accountability, especially in responding to the sixth mass extinction event and COVID-19 crisis. Our results can also guide the policymakers and stakeholders of the financial market in better decision making.


1986 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 513-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. C. Ribeiro ◽  
A. Spielman
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 144 (5) ◽  
pp. 1619-1629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Piqueray ◽  
Emmanuelle Bisteau ◽  
Sara Cristofoli ◽  
Rodolphe Palm ◽  
Peter Poschlod ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Hieronimus

The progress of technology is considered by the majority as a reasonable endeavor. Nevertheless, the author tries to show that technological progress, in spite of its benefits, causes a variety of absurd dangers because of its uncontrolled growth. The author introduces the leading thinkers of a movement known as “Decroissance” which argues for a “philosophy of degrowth”. Degrowth means the undoing of technological growth and demands an end of its philosophy of “faster, wider, higher and more”. A destructive power can be seen in this, causing overexploitation in nature as well as the annihilation of humankind, not just by the machinery of war. Indeed, in view of the ecological and economical crises of our time, such as species extinction, the contaminations of the soil, the air and the sea, climate change and its impact on many societies, military conflicts due to scarce resources, then a return to more simplicity, frugality and reserve seems quite reasonable and absolutely essential in order to put an end to the madness. Hence the idea of “Decroissance” is quite relevant today and this article gives an instructive overview.


Genre ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-292
Author(s):  
Ben De Bruyn

This article examines Lucy Ellmann's encyclopedic novel Ducks, Newburyport (2019) in the context of debates on modernist legacies, animal characters, and climate fiction. It pays particular attention to the text's signature strategy of including anecdotes about nonhuman creatures exposed to distinct forms of violence, anecdotes that reveal the concerns of the human narrator and her daughter but also highlight other animals, their unfamiliar phenomenologies, and their cautious cross-species partnerships. More specifically, the article tracks individual animals across the novel's pages and reconstructs their semiautonomous subplots as they unfold in a world characterized by animal cruelty, species extinction, and industrial labor. By forcing us to consider the perspectives of creatures like Jim, Mishipeshu, Audrey, and Gracia, Ellmann's narrative reminds us that the climate emergency does not just destabilize a shared geological environment but also endangers multiple and heterogeneous biological worlds.


2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 1294-1300 ◽  
Author(s):  
GRAHAM J. EDGAR ◽  
CATH R. SAMSON ◽  
NEVILLE S. BARRETT

2011 ◽  
pp. 92-102
Author(s):  
Franck Courchamp ◽  
Elena Angulo ◽  
Philippe Rivalan ◽  
Richard Hall ◽  
Laetitia Signoret ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document