Share price reaction to research and development spending: Canadian evidence

1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-398
Author(s):  
Trevor W. Chamberlain
Keyword(s):  
Research And Development ◽  
Share Price ◽  
Price Reaction ◽  
Development Spending

Share Price Reaction to Earnings Announcement on the JSE-ALTX

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Walters Kruger ◽  
Vatiswa Mlonzi ◽  
Meiya Gert Nthoesane
Keyword(s):  
Share Price ◽  
Earnings Announcement ◽  
Price Reaction

Share Price Reaction to Sales Contract Announcement

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 697-710
Author(s):  
Sungjin Son ◽  
Soonho Kim
Keyword(s):  
Share Price ◽  
Price Reaction

scholarly journals Systematic Share Price Fluctuations after Bankruptcy Filings and the Investors Who Drive Them

2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C. Dawkins ◽  
Nilabhra Bhattacharya ◽  
Linda Smith Bamber
Keyword(s):  
Share Price ◽  
Price Fluctuations ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Price Reaction ◽  
Bull Market ◽  
Bear Markets ◽  
Small Traders

AbstractBeginning in the 1990s, firms often continue to trade on the major national exchanges after Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings. For bankruptcies filed from 1993–2003, we find that the more negative the filing period price reaction, the more favorable the immediate post-filing returns, on average. This reversal is not attributable to bid-ask bounce, it holds after controlling for other factors associated with post-filing returns, and it appears more attributable to the activities of large traders than to small traders. Supplementary tests reveal that the pattern of post-filing returns differs significantly for bankruptcies filed in bull versus bear markets. Bankruptcies filed during the 1993 to 1999 bull market enjoy substantial but short-lived reversals averaging one-third of the filing period price plunge. These reversals are inconsistent with efficient assimilation of the bankruptcy information. In contrast, we find no evidence of post-filing reversals for bankruptcies filed from 2000 to 2003.

Don’t “Waste” Your Time! The Effects of Time Series Errors in Management Research: The Case of Ownership Concentration and Research and Development Spending

1993 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 897-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald D. Bergh
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Research And Development ◽  
Longitudinal Analysis ◽  
Fortune 500 ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Management Research ◽  
Clear Cut ◽  
Longitudinal Effects ◽  
Development Spending ◽  
The Relationship

The potential effects of “time series errors” in longitudinal analysis are examined empirically. Using a common hypothesis (the relationship between ownership concentration and research and development (R&D) spending) and a panel of 183 Fortune 500 firms (I 985-l 988) several time series errors are calculated. These analyses are then contrasted with the results of a procedure protected from time series errors. Comparisons show that (I) results may depend upon how researchers define and measure longitudinal effects; (2) time series errors can have significant effects on empirical findings; and (3) the linkage between ownership concentration and R&D may not be as clear-cut as previous studies have suggested. Recommendations for how researchers should account, save, and tell their time are offered.

Public agricultural research and development spending in South Africa – update

Agrekon ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petronella Chaminuka ◽  
Nienke Beintema ◽  
Kathleen Flaherty ◽  
Frikkie Liebenberg
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Research And Development ◽  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Agricultural Research And Development ◽  
Development Spending ◽  
Public Agricultural Research
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document