Effect of lesions of the ascending 5-hydroxytryptaminergic pathways on timing behaviour investigated with the fixed-interval peak procedure

1994 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 463-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Morrissey ◽  
M. -Y. Ho ◽  
Mary A. Wogar ◽  
C. M. Bradshaw ◽  
E. Szabadi
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Interval ◽  
Peak Procedure ◽  
Timing Behaviour

Effects of desipramine and fluvoxamine on timing behaviour investigated with the fixed-interval peak procedure and the interval bisection task

1996 ◽  
Vol 125 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. -Y. Ho ◽  
S. S. A. Al-Zahrani ◽  
D. N. Velazquez Martinez ◽  
M. Lopez Cabrera ◽  
C. M. Bradshaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Interval ◽  
Bisection Task ◽  
Peak Procedure ◽  
Timing Behaviour

scholarly journals Fos expression in the orbital prefrontal cortex after exposure to the fixed-interval peak procedure

2012 ◽  
Vol 229 (2) ◽  
pp. 372-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Valencia-Torres ◽  
C.M. Olarte-Sánchez ◽  
S. Body ◽  
K.C.F. Fone ◽  
C.M. Bradshaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Fixed Interval ◽  
Peak Procedure ◽  
Orbital Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Fos Expression

Effects of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor stimulation on temporal differentiation performance in the fixed-interval peak procedure

2006 ◽  
Vol 71 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 250-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Asgari ◽  
S. Body ◽  
Z. Zhang ◽  
K.C.F. Fone ◽  
C.M. Bradshaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Interval ◽  
Receptor Stimulation ◽  
Peak Procedure ◽  
Temporal Differentiation

The Effects of Variable-Interval and Fixed-Interval Signal Presentation Schedules on the Auditory Evoked Response

1969 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Nelson ◽  
Frank M. Lassman ◽  
Richard L. Hoel
Keyword(s):  
Variable Interval ◽  
Tone Burst ◽  
Signal Amplitude ◽  
Fixed Interval ◽  
Interval Schedule ◽  
Sensation Level ◽  
Fixed Interval Schedule ◽  
Auditory Evoked Responses ◽  
Auditory Evoked Response ◽  
Signal Presentation

Averaged auditory evoked responses to 1000-Hz 20-msec tone bursts were obtained from normal-hearing adults under two different intersignal interval schedules: (1) a fixed-interval schedule with 2-sec intersignal intervals, and (2) a variable-interval schedule of intersignal intervals ranging randomly from 1.0 sec to 4.5 sec with a mean of 2 sec. Peak-to-peak amplitudes (N 1 — P 2 ) as well as latencies of components P 1 , N 1 , P 2 , and N 2 were compared under the two different conditions of intersignal interval. No consistent or significant differences between variable- and fixed-interval schedules were found in the averaged responses to signals of either 20 dB SL or 50 dB SL. Neither were there significant schedule differences when 35 or 70 epochs were averaged per response. There were, however, significant effects due to signal amplitude and to the number of epochs averaged per response. Response amplitude increased and response latency decreased with sensation level of the tone burst.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document