Model of a measurement error distribution function

1989 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 742-747
Author(s):  
V. A. Meshkov
2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (1/2007) ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ursula U. Müller ◽  
Anton Schick ◽  
Wolfgang Wefelmeyer

1983 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-71
Author(s):  
J. P. Gibson ◽  
J. C. Alliston

ABSTRACTPhotographs of ultrasonic images of 10 animals were taken. Two replicate photographs were taken at each of four body positions (10th rib, 13th rib, 3rd lumbar and hindquarter) on both sides of the body in the morning and the afternoon of the day of scanning. Several measurements were taken on each photograph by an experienced interpreter. Replicate photographs failed to account for all possible sources of measurement error. Since neither time of day nor side of the body affected the mean value, taking observations at different times of the day or on both sides of the body could permit most sources of measurement error to be taken into account. Variation due to errors of measurement and differences among animals are presented. The residual error distribution contained several extreme outliers.It was concluded that a better understanding of all the sources of bias and error will be needed if ultrasonic measurements are to be more widely used.


1988 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Shunian ◽  
Li Zhu ◽  
Li Guangying

2010 ◽  
Vol 439-440 ◽  
pp. 1153-1158
Author(s):  
Pan Xiong ◽  
Shuan Li Yuan ◽  
Shao Jie Cheng

The distribution of observation errors is determined according to their magnitudes by using the distribution collocation test method or figure method taking into account the result, sample total, the interval density etc. It is therefore difficult to get the specific type of error distribution of observations by conventional methods. In analyzing the actual situation of the observation error distribution using their statistical properties, this paper proposes the use of unsymmetrical distribution to express the true distribution of the observation errors. The P-norm distribution is a generalized form of a group of error distributions, and from the statistical properties of random errors we can arrive at an unsymmetrical P-norm distribution according to the practical situation of the occurrence of random errors. The common P-norm distribution is the specific case of this distribution. This paper deduces the density function equation of the unsymmetrical P-norm distribution, obtained the statistical properties of the distribution function and the evaluation of precision index. By choosing appropriate value for p, we can get closer to the distribution function of the true error distribution.


Biometrika ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 841-856
Author(s):  
Linh H Nghiem ◽  
Michael C Byrd ◽  
Cornelis J Potgieter

Summary Parameter estimation in linear errors-in-variables models typically requires that the measurement error distribution be known or estimable from replicate data. A generalized method of moments approach can be used to estimate model parameters in the absence of knowledge of the error distributions, but it requires the existence of a large number of model moments. In this paper, parameter estimation based on the phase function, a normalized version of the characteristic function, is considered. This approach requires the model covariates to have asymmetric distributions, while the error distributions are symmetric. Parameters are estimated by minimizing a distance function between the empirical phase functions of the noisy covariates and the outcome variable. No knowledge of the measurement error distribution is needed to calculate this estimator. Both asymptotic and finite-sample properties of the estimator are studied. The connection between the phase function approach and method of moments is also discussed. The estimation of standard errors is considered and a modified bootstrap algorithm for fast computation is proposed. The newly proposed estimator is competitive with the generalized method of moments, despite making fewer model assumptions about the moment structure of the measurement error. Finally, the proposed method is applied to a real dataset containing measurements of air pollution levels.


Statistics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Galvão Patriota ◽  
Heleno Bolfarine

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document