A cost-effectiveness comparison of supported employment and rehabilitative day treatment

1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin E. Clark ◽  
Philip W. Bush ◽  
Deborah R. Becker ◽  
Robert E. Drake
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Supported Employment ◽  
Day Treatment

Do long-term day treatment clients benefit from supported employment?

1998 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward L. Bailey ◽  
Susan K. Ricketts ◽  
Deborah R. Becker ◽  
Haiyi Xie ◽  
Robert E. Drake
Keyword(s):  
Supported Employment ◽  
Day Treatment

Converting Day Treatment Centers to Supported Employment Programs in Rhode Island

2001 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah R. Becker ◽  
Gary R. Bond ◽  
Daniel McCarthy ◽  
Daniel Thompson ◽  
Haiyi Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rhode Island ◽  
Supported Employment ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Employment Programs ◽  
Supported Employment Programs

Planning a statewide project to convert day treatment to supported employment.

1998 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel McCarthy ◽  
Daniel Thompson ◽  
Susan Olson
Keyword(s):  
Supported Employment ◽  
Day Treatment

Cost-effectiveness of supported employment adapted for people with affective disorders

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjib Saha ◽  
Ulrika Bejerholm ◽  
Ulf-G Gerdtham ◽  
Johan Jarl
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Affective Disorders ◽  
Supported Employment

Cost-effectiveness of cognitive remediation and supported employment for people with mental illness: a randomized controlled trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Yamaguchi ◽  
S. Sato ◽  
N. Horio ◽  
K. Yoshida ◽  
M. Shimodaira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Supported Employment ◽  
Cognitive Remediation ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Cognitive Improvement ◽  
Vocational Outcomes ◽  
People With Mental Illness ◽  
Significant Difference

BackgroundLittle is known about the economic benefits of cognitive remediation and supported employment (CR + SE). The present study aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of CR + SE compared with traditional vocational services (TVS).MethodIndividuals with mental illness and low cognitive function were recruited at six sites in Japan. A total of 111 participants were randomly allocated to the CR + SE group or the TVS group. Clinical and vocational outcomes were assessed at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Service utilization data were collected monthly. The data on outcomes and costs were combined to examine cost-effectiveness.ResultsThe data were obtained from a total of 92 participants. The CR + SE group resulted in better vocational and clinical outcomes (employment rate, 62.2%; work tenures, 78.6 days; cognitive improvement, 0.5) than the TVS group (19.1%, 24.9 days and 0.2). There was no significant difference in mean total costs between the groups (CR + SE group: $9823, s.d. = $6372, TVS group: $11 063, s.d. = $11 263) with and without adjustment for covariates. However, mean cost for medical services in the CR + SE group was significantly lower than that in the TVS group after adjusting covariates (Β = −$3979, 95% confidence interval −$7816 to −$143, p = 0.042). Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for vocational outcomes illustrated the high probabilities (approximately 70%) of the CR + SE group being more cost-effective than TVS when society is not willing to pay additional costs.ConclusionsCR + SE appears to be a cost-effective option for people with mental illness who have low cognitive functioning when compared with TVS.

Cost-Effectiveness of Supported Employment for Veterans With Spinal Cord Injuries

2014 ◽  
Vol 95 (7) ◽  
pp. 1254-1261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia L. Sinnott ◽  
Vilija Joyce ◽  
Pon Su ◽  
Lisa Ottomanelli ◽  
Lance L. Goetz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Supported Employment ◽  
Spinal Cord Injuries
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document