Neurological outcome in high risk weight appropriate for gestational age preterm children at early school age

1990 ◽  
Vol 149 (12) ◽  
pp. 835-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. H. Largo ◽  
L. Molinari ◽  
S. Kundu ◽  
U. Hunziker ◽  
G. Duc
Author(s):  
Marie P. Pittet-Metrailler ◽  
Ines Mrner-Lavanchy ◽  
Mark Adams ◽  
Myriam Bickle Graz ◽  
Riccardo E. Pfister ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 981-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelieke S. H. Aarnoudse-Moens ◽  
Diana P. Smidts ◽  
Jaap Oosterlaan ◽  
Hugo J. Duivenvoorden ◽  
Nynke Weisglas-Kuperus

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. e1003435
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Hutcheon ◽  
Sam Harper ◽  
Jessica Liauw ◽  
M. Amanda Skoll ◽  
Myriam Srour ◽  
...  

Background There are growing concerns that antenatal corticosteroid administration may harm children’s neurodevelopment. We investigated the safety of antenatal corticosteroid administration practices for children’s overall developmental health (skills and behaviors) at early school age. Methods and findings We linked population health and education databases from British Columbia (BC), Canada to identify a cohort of births admitted to hospital between 31 weeks, 0 days gestation (31+0 weeks), and 36+6 weeks, 2000 to 2013, with routine early school age child development testing. We used a regression discontinuity design to compare outcomes of infants admitted just before and just after the clinical threshold for corticosteroid administration of 34+0 weeks. We estimated the median difference in the overall Early Development Instrument (EDI) score and EDI subdomain scores, as well as risk differences (RDs) for special needs designation and developmental vulnerability (<10th percentile on 2 or more subdomains). The cohort included 5,562 births admitted between 31+0 and 36+6 weeks, with a median EDI score of 40/50. We found no evidence that antenatal corticosteroid administration practices were linked with altered child development at early school age: median EDI score difference of −0.5 [95% CI: −2.2 to 1.7] (p = 0.65), RD per 100 births for special needs designation −0.5 [−4.2 to 3.1] (p = 0.96) and for developmental vulnerability of 3.9 [95% CI:−2.2 to 10.0] (p = 0.24). A limitation of our study is that the regression discontinuity design estimates the effect of antenatal corticosteroid administration at the gestational age of the discontinuity, 34 + 0 weeks, so our results may become less generalisable as gestational age moves further away from this point. Conclusions Our study did not find that that antenatal corticosteroid administration practices were associated with child development at early school age. Our findings may be useful for supporting clinical counseling about antenatal corticosteroids administration at late preterm gestation, when the balance of harms and benefits is less clear.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 712-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy M. Briët ◽  
Aleid G. van Wassenaer ◽  
Friedo W. Dekker ◽  
Jan J. M. de Vijlder ◽  
Anneloes van Baar ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 106 (9) ◽  
pp. 1468-1473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sari O'Meagher ◽  
Nenagh Kemp ◽  
Kimberley Norris ◽  
Peter Anderson ◽  
Clive Skilbeck

1996 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 511-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Moss ◽  
Sophie Parent ◽  
Catherine Gosselin ◽  
Denise Rousseau ◽  
Diane St-Laurent

AbstractThe association between attachment and behavior problems was examined for a nonclinical, diverse sociocconomic status (SES) French-Canadian sample of 77 children. Attachment classifications were assigned on the basis of reunion behavior with mother when the children were between 5 and 7 years of age. Teachers rated children's problem behavior using the Socioaffective Profile within 3 months of the attachment assessment (Time 2) and 2 years earlier (Time 1). Results indicated that children with a D classification were more likely than secures or other insecure groups (A or C) to be classified in the problem group at both ages. A majority (80%) of the D group showed problem behavior at some point during the 3–7 year period compared with a minority of A, B, or C children. However, only about 30% of controlling children (like other insecures) had stable problems. Analyses of subclinical scores showed that both controlling and avoidant groups were lower than secures in social competence at Time 1. At Time 2, A group children were lower in externalizing behavior, and C group children were higher. These results extend the association between the D classification and maladaptation previously found for clinical and high-risk samples to a nonclinical, mixed SES sample.


2010 ◽  
Vol 222 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Brunnemann ◽  
K Kipp ◽  
J Meng-Hentschel ◽  
MG Shamdeen ◽  
A Mecklinger

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document