Immediate and Long-Term Results of Carotid Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic High-Grade Stenosis

1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Riles ◽  
Frederick S. Fisher ◽  
Patrick J. Lamparello ◽  
Gary Giangola ◽  
Lee Gibstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
High Grade

scholarly journals Why carotid endarterectomy is method of choice in treatment of carotid stenosis

2008 ◽  
Vol 136 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Djordje Radak ◽  
Lazar Davidovic
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Carotid Stenosis ◽  
Stent Implantation ◽  
Radical Neck Dissection ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
The Common ◽  
Graft Interposition

Procedures used in treatment of carotid stenosis are endarterectomy, PTA with stent implantation, resection with graft interposition and by-pass procedure. Segmental lesions are found more often and treated by the first two mentioned procedures. In case of longer lesions and extension to the greater part of the common carotid artery, the other two procedures are performed. For the past few years, the main dilemma has been whether to perform carotid endarterectomy or PTA with stent implantation. Both early and long-term results speak in favour of carotid endarterectomy, regardless of an increased number of PTA and carotid stenting. At the same time, PTA and carotid stenting are more expensive procedures. Both methods have their defined and important roles in treatment of segmental occlusive carotid lesions. Severe cardiac, pulmonary and renal conditions, which increase the risk of general anaesthesia, are not an absolute indication for PTA and stenting, since endarterectomy can be done in regional anaesthesia. Main indications for PTA with stent implantation are: surgically inaccessible lesions (at or above C2; or subclavian); radiation- induced carotid stenosis; prior ipsilateral radical neck dissection; prior carotid endarterectomy (restenosis).

scholarly journals Surgical Treatment of Proximal Segmental Occlusion of the Internal Carotid Artery

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Srdjan Babić ◽  
Slobodan Tanasković ◽  
Mihailo Nešković ◽  
Predrag Gajin ◽  
Dragoslav Nenezić ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Common Symptom ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

Purpose. To present the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy in patients with type II internal carotid artery occlusions, including the long-term outcomes. Methods. From March 2008 to August 2015, 74 consecutive patients (48 men with a mean age of 65.1 ± 8.06 years) underwent carotid endarterectomy because of internal carotid artery (ICA) segmental occlusions. These were verified with preoperative carotid duplex scans (CDS) and CT angiography (CTA). Also, brain CT scanning was performed in all these patients. The indication for treatment was made jointly by a vascular surgeon, neurologist, and an interventional radiologist in a multidisciplinary team (MDT) context. After successful treatment, all the patients were followed-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, then every 6 months thereafter. Results. The most common symptom at presentation was transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in 49 patients (66.2%), followed by stroke in the past six months in the 17 remaining patients (23%). Revascularisation of the ICA with endarterectomy techniques was performed successfully in all the patients with an average clamp time of 11.9 min. All the procedures were performed under general anaesthesia in combination with a superficial cervical block. The early complication rate was 8.1% and included two cardiac events (2.7%) (one rhythm disorder and one acute coronary syndrome), three TIAs (4.1%), and one intracerebral hemorrhage (1.3%). Only one patient with the intracerebral hemorrhage died 5 days after surgery giving a postoperative mortality of 1.3% for this series. During the follow-up period (mean 50.4 ± 31.3 months), the primary patency rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 98.4%, 94.9%, 92.9%, and 82.9%, respectively. Likewise, the survival rates were 98.7%, 96.8%, 89%, and 77.6%, respectively. Ultrasound Doppler controls during follow-up detected 8 ICA restenoses; however, only 3 of these patients required further endovascular treatment. Conclusions. Carotid endarterectomy of internal carotid artery (ICA) segmental occlusion is a safe and effective procedure associated with acceptable risk and good long-term results. Therefore, the current guidelines which do not recommend carotid endarterectomy in this patient group should be reassessed, with the requirement for ongoing large-scale randomized controlled trials to compare CEA with best medical therapy in this patient cohort.

scholarly journals Randomized trial of vein versus dacron patching during carotid endarterectomy: Long-term results

2004 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 985-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross Naylor ◽  
Paul D. Hayes ◽  
David A. Payne ◽  
Holger Allroggen ◽  
Sarah Steel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Long Term Results

Urgent Carotid Endarterectomy for Patients with Unstable Symptoms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes

Vascular ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 243-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin O. Patterson ◽  
Peter J. Holt ◽  
Robert J. Hinchliffe ◽  
Matt M. Thompson ◽  
Ian M. Loftus
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Current evidence suggests that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed within 2 weeks of symptoms produces better long-term results than if it is delayed. Urgent endarterectomy following unstable presentations such as crescendo transient ischemic attack (cTIA) or progressive stroke has been associated with variable results. The evidence for this treatment strategy required reviewing. A systematic review of articles related to urgent CEA between 1980 and 2008 was performed. For cTIA, there was an odds ratio of 5.6 (95% confidence interval 3.3–9.7, p ≤ .0001) for combined stroke or death compared with surgery for “standard” indications. For unstable stroke, the odds ratio was 5.5 (95% confidence interval 3.1–9.3, p ≤ .0001). Patients with unstable neurologic presentations are at higher risk of complications if operated on urgently. Clearer definitions would help more precise patient selection to avoid inadvertently operating on patients with an unacceptably high risk of poor outcome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document