Countable models of superstable theories

1990 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. R. Baisalov
Keyword(s):  
Superstable Theories ◽  
Countable Models

Countable models of trivial theories which admit finite coding

1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 1279-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Loveys ◽  
Predrag Tanović
Keyword(s):  
Order Theory ◽  
First Order ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Superstable Theories ◽  
Countable Models

AbstractWe prove:Theorem. A complete first order theory in a countable language which is strictly stable, trivial and which admits finite coding hasnonisomorphic countable models.Combined with the corresponding result or superstable theories from [4] our result confirms the Vaught conjecture for trivial theories which admit finite coding.

Superstable theories with few countable models

1992 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 457-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee Fong Low ◽  
Anand Pillay
Keyword(s):  
Superstable Theories ◽  
Countable Models

Remarks on weak notions of saturation in models of Peano arithmetic

1987 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt Kaufmann ◽  
James H. Schmerl
Keyword(s):  
Peano Arithmetic ◽  
Saturated Model ◽  
Simple Extension ◽  
Minimal Models ◽  
Recursively Saturated ◽  
Countable Models

This paper is a sequel to our earlier paper [2] entitled Saturation and simple extensions of models of Peano arithmetic. Among other things, we will answer some of the questions that were left open there. In §1 we consider the question of whether there are lofty models of PA which have no recursively saturated, simple extensions. We are still unable to answer this question; but we do show in that section that these models are precisely the lofty models which are not recursively saturated and which are κ-like for some regular κ. In §2 we use diagonal methods to produce minimal models of PA in which the standard cut is recursively definable, and other minimal models in which the standard cut is not recursively definable. In §3 we answer two questions from [2] by exhibiting countable models of PA which, in the terminology of this paper, are uniformly ω-lofty but not continuously ω-lofty and others which are continuously ω-lofty but not recursively saturated. We also construct a model (assuming ◇) which is not recursively saturated but every proper, simple cofinal extension of which is ℵ1-saturated. Finally, in §4 we answer another question from [2] by proving that for regular κ ≥ ℵ1; every κ-saturated model of PA has a κ-saturated proper, simple extension which is not κ+-saturated.Our notation and terminology are quite standard. Anything unfamiliar to the reader and not adequately denned here is probably defined in §1 of [2]. All models considered are models of Peano arithmetic.

Theories with a Countable Set of Countable Models

2000 ◽  
pp. 141-165
Author(s):  
Yuri L. Ershov ◽  
Sergei S. Goncharov
Keyword(s):  
Countable Models

Refinements of Vaught's normal from theorem

1979 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Harnik
Keyword(s):  
Normal Form ◽  
Boolean Combination ◽  
Form Theorem ◽  
Central Notion ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Normal Form Theorem ◽  
Skolem Theorem ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Countable Models

The central notion of this paper is that of a (conjunctive) game-sentence, i.e., a sentence of the formwhere the indices ki, ji range over given countable sets and the matrix conjuncts are, say, open -formulas. Such game sentences were first considered, independently, by Svenonius [19], Moschovakis [13]—[15] and Vaught [20]. Other references are [1], [3]—[5], [10]—[12]. The following normal form theorem was proved by Vaught (and, in less general forms, by his predecessors).Theorem 0.1. Let L = L0(R). For every -sentence ϕ there is an L0-game sentence Θ such that ⊨′ ∃Rϕ ↔ Θ.(A word about the notations: L0(R) denotes the language obtained from L0 by adding to it the sequence R of logical symbols which do not belong to L0; “⊨′α” means that α is true in all countable models.)0.1 can be restated as follows.Theorem 0.1′. For every-sentence ϕ there is an L0-game sentence Θ such that ⊨ϕ → Θ and for any-sentence ϕ if ⊨ϕ → ϕ and L′ ⋂ L ⊆ L0, then ⊨ Θ → ϕ.(We sketch the proof of the equivalence between 0.1 and 0.1′.0.1 implies 0.1′. This is obvious once we realize that game sentences and their negations satisfy the downward Löwenheim-Skolem theorem and hence, ⊨′α is equivalent to ⊨α whenever α is a boolean combination of and game sentences.

scholarly journals COUNTABLE MODELS OF THE THEORIES OF BALDWIN–SHI HYPERGRAPHS AND THEIR REGULAR TYPES

2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 1007-1019
Author(s):  
DANUL K. GUNATILLEKA
Keyword(s):  
Large Body ◽  
Countable Model ◽  
Stable Theory ◽  
Generic Structure ◽  
Elementary Chain ◽  
Regular Type ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Original Class ◽  
Countable Models

AbstractWe continue the study of the theories of Baldwin–Shi hypergraphs from [5]. Restricting our attention to when the rank δ is rational valued, we show that each countable model of the theory of a given Baldwin–Shi hypergraph is isomorphic to a generic structure built from some suitable subclass of the original class used in the construction. We introduce a notion of dimension for a model and show that there is a an elementary chain $\left\{ {\mathfrak{M}_\beta :\beta \leqslant \omega } \right\}$ of countable models of the theory of a fixed Baldwin–Shi hypergraph with $\mathfrak{M}_\beta \preccurlyeq \mathfrak{M}_\gamma $ if and only if the dimension of $\mathfrak{M}_\beta $ is at most the dimension of $\mathfrak{M}_\gamma $ and that each countable model is isomorphic to some $\mathfrak{M}_\beta $. We also study the regular types that appear in these theories and show that the dimension of a model is determined by a particular regular type. Further, drawing on a large body of work, we use these structures to give an example of a pseudofinite, ω-stable theory with a nonlocally modular regular type, answering a question of Pillay in [11].

Notes on the stability of separably closed fields

1979 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 412-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Wood
Keyword(s):  
Differential Algebra ◽  
Complete Theory ◽  
Model Completeness ◽  
Closed Fields ◽  
Superstable Theories ◽  
Basic Facts ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Differential Fields

AbstractThe stability of each of the theories of separably closed fields is proved, in the manner of Shelah's proof of the corresponding result for differentially closed fields. These are at present the only known stable but not superstable theories of fields. We indicate in §3 how each of the theories of separably closed fields can be associated with a model complete theory in the language of differential algebra. We assume familiarity with some basic facts about model completeness [4], stability [7], separably closed fields [2] or [3], and (for §3 only) differential fields [8].

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document