Villous tumors of the colon and rectum: Double-contrast study of 47 cases

1980 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Delamarre ◽  
Philippe Descombes ◽  
Raymond Marti ◽  
Alexandre Rémond ◽  
Gérard Trinez
Keyword(s):  
Contrast Study ◽  
Double Contrast ◽  
Villous Tumors ◽  
Colon And Rectum

Villous Tumors of the Colon and Rectum

1955 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 891-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
MERRILL O. HINES ◽  
PATRICK H. HANLEY ◽  
ROBERT SCHRAMEL
Keyword(s):  
Villous Tumors ◽  
Colon And Rectum

Surgical Management of Villous Tumors of the Colon and Rectum

1984 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 168-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Malafosse ◽  
P. Roge
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Management ◽  
Villous Tumors ◽  
Colon And Rectum

A Simple One-Stage Method of Double-Contrast Study of the Colon

Radiology ◽  
1951 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Moreton ◽  
Edward M. Cooper ◽  
Edward F. Foegelle
Keyword(s):  
Contrast Study ◽  
Double Contrast ◽  
One Stage

Usefulness and safety of pirenzepine in double-contrast study of upper gastrointestinal tract: Comparison with scopolamine methylbromide

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Braccini ◽  
P. Marraccini ◽  
A. Marrucci ◽  
P. Boraschi ◽  
F. Falaschi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Tract ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Tract ◽  
Contrast Study ◽  
Double Contrast ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Pain after barium enema: effect of CO2 and air on double-contrast study.

Radiology ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 157 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
C L Coblentz ◽  
R A Frost ◽  
V Molinaro ◽  
G W Stevenson
Keyword(s):  
Barium Enema ◽  
Contrast Study ◽  
Double Contrast

Villous tumors of the colon and rectum

1958 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merrill O. Hines ◽  
Patrick H. Hanley ◽  
John E. Ray ◽  
Max Bralliar
Keyword(s):  
Villous Tumors ◽  
Colon And Rectum

Accuracy of Radiologic and Endoscopic Diagnosis of Gastric Ulcer

1987 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Gjørup ◽  
E. Agner ◽  
L. Bording Jensen ◽  
A. Mørup Jensen ◽  
K.-M. Møllmann
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Ulcer ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy ◽  
Contrast Study ◽  
Double Contrast ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal ◽  
Test Result

Patients with upper abdominal pain are often examined with both double contrast study of the stomach and endoscopy. On the basis of the results of the two examinations four diagnostic criteria of an ulcer can be formed: 1) radiography reveals an ulcer, 2) endoscopy reveals an ulcer, 3) both radiography and endoscopy reveal an ulcer, and 4) radiography and/or endoscopy reveals an ulcer. In a prospective study the accuracy of each of the four diagnostic criteria was examined. Eighty-two randomly selected outpatients had a double contrast barium examination and an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy performed by staff personnel. The diagnosis of a specialist in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was used as the standard. For the four diagnostic criteria the overall accuracy ranged from 0.80 to 0.88. The predictive value of a positive test result was around 0.70 and the predictive value of a negative test result ranged from 0.81 to 0.96. The specificity ranged from 0.87 to 0.95, and the sensitivity from 0.38 to 0.90. It is concluded that from a clinical point of view, the accuracy of the four diagnostic criteria does not differ to an extent that justifies recommendation of one diagnostic criterion of gastric ulcer rather than the other.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document