Equivalent local potential for the fish bone optical potential by inversion of its phase shifts

1985 ◽  
Vol 320 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Lipperheide ◽  
H. Fiedeldey ◽  
E. W. Schmid ◽  
S. A. Sofianos
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 134
Author(s):  
C. Daskaloyannis

The explicit formulae of the equivalent local potentials for a coupled channel problem are calculated. We prove that the equivalent local potential of the coupled channel system coincides with the equivalent local potential of the Feshbach optical potential.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
R.J. Lombard ◽  
R. Mezhoud ◽  
R. Yekken

The occurrence of complex potentials with real eigenvalues has implications concerning the inverse problem, i.e. the determination of a potential from its spectrum. First, any complex potential with real eigenvalues has at least one equivalent local potential. Secondly, a real spectrum does not necessarily corresponds to a local real potential. A basic ambiguity arises from the possibility the spectrum to be generated by a complex potential. The purpose of this work is to discuss several aspects of this problem.


1972 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Eisenberg ◽  
Reed Guy

Second-order corrections to the optical potential for kaonic atoms are evaluated in the form of an approximate, local potential which takes into account an isovector correlation function but omits Pauli and hard-core correlations. The corrections are found to be very small, a result not appreciably modified when rough estimates of the consequences of Pauli correlations are considered.


Author(s):  
Anil Khachi ◽  
O.S.K.S. Sastri ◽  
Lalit Kumar ◽  
Aditi Sharma

The phase shifts for α- α scattering have been modeled using a two parameter Gaussian local potential. The time independent Schrodinger equation (TISE) has been solved iteratively using Monte-Carlo approach till the S and D bound states of the numerical solution match with the experimental binding energy data in a variational sense. The obtained potential with best fit parameters is taken as input for determining the phase-shifts for the S channel using the non-linear first order differential equation of the phase function method (PFM). It is numerically solved using 5th order Runge-Kutta (RK-5) technique. To determine the phase shifts for the ℓ=2 and 4 scattering state i.e. D and G-channel, the inversion potential parameters have been determined using variational Monte-Carlo (VMC) approach to minimize the realtive mean square error w.r.t. the experimental data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document