Inspiratory work imposed by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machines: the effect of CPAP level and endotracheal tube size

1992 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 148-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Moran ◽  
S. Homan ◽  
M. O'Fathartaigh ◽  
M. Jackson ◽  
P. Leppard
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-120
Author(s):  
Bedford W. Bonta ◽  
Joseph B. Warshaw

Since the introduction of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) via endotracheal tube by Gregory et al.1 in 1971, several alternate methods of delivering CPAP without the need for endotracheal intubation have been suggested, including the use of nasopharyngeal prongs.2 A major peoblem, however, in delivering CPAP either by endotracheal tube or by nasal prongs has been that of securing the endotracheal tube (or prongs) in place. Recently, Cussel et al.3 have suggested the use of a Hollister plastic clamp adapted for this use. We have used this method successfully for securing endotracheal tubes in place and recently have modified the clamp to secure nasal prongs used to deliver "benign" CPAP without the need for endotracheal intubation in selected patients.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 621-623
Author(s):  
Robert M. Shuman ◽  
Thomas K. Oliver

Pediatricians caring for the newborn are particularly aware of unexpected deleterious outcomes of well-intentioned therapy. Oxygen, chloramphenicol, sulfadiazine, and continuous positive airway pressure are examples. Elsewhere in this issue Pape et al.1 suggest that intermittent positive-pressure ventilation provided by a tight-fitting face mask in low-birthweight infants is yet another example. They observed a 30% incidence of significant intracerebellar hemorrhages in infants so treated (groups A and D). Such hemorrhages were seen in 10% of babies who were ventilated by an endotracheal tube rather than by mask (groups B and C), and were not seen in their 13 nonventilated babies (group E).


1995 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 1023-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. K. S. Tan ◽  
S. B. Bhatt ◽  
Y. H. Tam ◽  
T. A. Buckley ◽  
T. E. Oh

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 768-768
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Harris ◽  
Richard C. Stevens ◽  
Michael Nugent

Although the application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) by endotracheal tube, head chamber and face mask is quite straightforward, its successful application by nasal cannula or prongs as recently described by Novogroder et al. and Kattwinkel et al. presupposes an understanding of certain crucial points not emphasized in these original articles. The new factor that comes into play when applying CPAP by nasal route is the variable leak at the mouth. When a large mouth leak is present in a delivery system that also has an appreciable flow resistance at the site of the nasal prongs or beyond in the nasal passages, a significant pressure drop may occur across these points.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document