Sex hormone concentrations in men with angiographically assessed coronary artery disease — Relationship to obesity and body fat distribution

1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (14) ◽  
pp. 664-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Hauner ◽  
K. Stangl ◽  
K. Burger ◽  
U. Busch ◽  
H. Blömer ◽  
...  
1990 ◽  
Vol 85 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 203-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Hauner ◽  
Karl Stangl ◽  
Christian Schmatz ◽  
Kurt Burger ◽  
Hans Blömer ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (13) ◽  
pp. 1135-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro Zamboni ◽  
Fabio Armellini ◽  
Imad Sheiban ◽  
Margherita De Marchi ◽  
Tiziana Todesco ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 162 (12) ◽  
pp. 503-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. T. Flynn ◽  
M. B. Codd ◽  
M. J. Gibney ◽  
E. T. M. Keelan ◽  
D. D. Sugrue

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Sabet ◽  
S Elkaffas ◽  
S.W.G Bakhoum ◽  
H Kandil

Abstract Introduction Smoking and obesity are recognized as important modifiable risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the general perception that smoking protects against obesity is a common reason for starting, and/or not quitting smoking. Purpose To detect the quantity, quality and relative distribution of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) estimated by abdominal computed tomography in smokers versus non- smokers. Methods The abdominal muscular wall was traced manually to calculate SAT and VAT areas (cm2) (outside and inside abdominal muscular wall respectively) as well as SAT density [Hounsfield units (HU)] at L4-L5 in 409 consecutive patients referred for evaluation of chest pain by multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (MSCT-CA). Results 26% of the studied patients (n=107) were current smokers, while the remaining 74% (n=302) never smoked. Coronary artery atherosclerosis was more prevalent in smokers compared to non-smokers (64.5% vs 55.0%; p=0.09). Smokers had statistically significantly lower body mass index (BMI) (31.2±4.3 vs. 32.5±4.7 kg/m2; p=0.015), hip circumference (HC) (98.6±22.5 vs. 103.9±20.9 cm; p=0.031), total fat area (441.62±166.34 vs. 517.95±169.51cm2; p<0.001), and SAT area (313.07±125.54 vs. 390.93±143.28 cm2; p<0.001) as compared to non-smokers. However, smokers had statistically significantly greater waist-to-hip ratio (0.98±0.08 vs. 0.96±0.08; p=0.010), VAT/SAT area ratio (0.41±0.23 vs. 0.35±0.20; p=0.013), and denser SAT depot (−98.91±7.71 vs. −102.08±6.44 HU; p<0.001). Conclusion Smoking contributes to CAD and to the pathogenic redistribution of body fat towards VAT, through limiting SAT potential to expand. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


QJM ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 108 (8) ◽  
pp. 641-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.-T. Huang ◽  
Y. Peng ◽  
W. Liu ◽  
C. Zhang ◽  
F.-Y. Huang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document