3He electron scattering sum rules

1982 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-262
Author(s):  
Y. E. Kim ◽  
V. Tornow
1981 ◽  
Vol 299 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Yu. Korchin ◽  
A. V. Shebeko

1975 ◽  
Vol 237 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.S. O'connell ◽  
J.W. Lightbody

1984 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 764-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Montgomery ◽  
Kwang-Bock Yoo ◽  
Herbert Überall ◽  
B. Bosco

Energy-weighted sum rules with separated isospin contributions for arbitrary operators and multipolarities are developed for photonuclear and electron-scattering transitions. The Kurath sum rule is contained as a special case. Applying the sum rule to magnetic dipole transitions, ensuing numerical predictions for non-self-conjugate nuclei are compared with experimental results.


1988 ◽  
Vol 61 (15) ◽  
pp. 1706-1709 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Dow ◽  
S. Dytman ◽  
D. Beck ◽  
A. Bernstein ◽  
I. Blomqvist ◽  
...  

1976 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 375 ◽  
Author(s):  
LJ Tassie

The isoscalar sum rules of Deal and Fallieros (1973) and generalizations of these sum rules are discussed. The isoscalar form factor and transition density for an arbitrary eigenstate of the nucleus are given as sums over the sum rules and, for a particular choice of the operators in the sum rules, are given by a series of which the first terms are the same as the results of the hydrodynamical model. It is shown that caution is needed in making nuclear spin assignments from inelastic electron scattering. The sum rule of Deal and Fallieros is used to clarify the calculation of Bohr and Mottelson (1975) of the energy of the isosca1.ar giant quadrupole resonance.


1989 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. R19-R21 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Lipparini ◽  
S. Stringari

1981 ◽  
Vol 369 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Tornow ◽  
Y.E. Kim ◽  
Yoon Suk Koh

1986 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 1012-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. S. Celenza ◽  
A. Harindranath ◽  
C. M. Shakin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document