Thermal boundary condition effects on heat transfer in turbulent rough-wall boundary layers

1992 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. P. Taylor ◽  
M. H. Hosni ◽  
J. W. Garner ◽  
H. W. Coleman
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Boundary Condition ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Thermal Boundary Condition ◽  
Rough Wall ◽  
Wall Boundary

Extended Models for Transitional Rough Wall Boundary Layers With Heat Transfer: Part I—Model Formulations

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Stripf ◽  
A. Schulz ◽  
H.-J. Bauer ◽  
S. Wittig
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Experimental Data ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Turbulence Intensity ◽  
Discrete Element ◽  
Rough Wall ◽  
Test Cases ◽  
Wall Boundary ◽  
Turbine Vane

Two extended models for the calculation of rough wall transitional boundary layers with heat transfer are presented. Both models comprise a new transition onset correlation, which accounts for the effects of roughness height and density, turbulence intensity and wall curvature. In the transition region, an intermittency equation suitable for rough wall boundary layers is used to blend between the laminar and fully turbulent state. Finally, two different submodels for the fully turbulent boundary layer complete the two models. In the first model, termed KS-TLK-T in this paper, a sand roughness approach from Durbin et al., which builds upon a two-layer k-ε-turbulence model, is used for this purpose. The second model, the so-called DEM-TLV-T model, makes use of the discrete-element roughness approach, which was recently combined with a two-layer k-ε-turbulence model by the present authors. The discrete element model will be formulated in a new way suitable for randomly rough topographies. Part I of the paper will provide detailed model formulations as well as a description of the database used for developing the new transition onset correlation. Part II contains a comprehensive validation of the two models, using a variety of test cases with transitional and fully turbulent boundary layers. The validation focuses on heat transfer calculations on both, the suction and the pressure side of modern turbine airfoils. Test cases include extensive experimental investigations on a high-pressure turbine vane with varying surface roughness and turbulence intensity, recently published by the current authors as well as new experimental data from a low-pressure turbine vane. In the majority of cases, the predictions from both models are in good agreement with the experimental data.

Extended Models for Transitional Rough Wall Boundary Layers With Heat Transfer: Part II—Model Validation and Benchmarking

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Stripf ◽  
A. Schulz ◽  
H.-J. Bauer ◽  
S. Wittig
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Experimental Data ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Turbulence Intensity ◽  
Discrete Element ◽  
Rough Wall ◽  
Test Cases ◽  
Wall Boundary ◽  
Turbine Vane

Two extended models for the calculation of rough wall transitional boundary layers with heat transfer are presented. Both models comprise a new transition onset correlation, which accounts for the effects of roughness height and density, turbulence intensity and wall curvature. In the transition region, an intermittency equation suitable for rough wall boundary layers is used to blend between the laminar and fully turbulent state. Finally, two different submodels for the fully turbulent boundary layer complete the two models. In the first model, termed KS-TLK-T in this paper, a sand roughness approach from Durbin et al., which builds upon a two-layer k-ε-turbulence model, is used for this purpose. The second model, the so-called DEM-TLV-T model, makes use of the discrete-element roughness approach, which was recently combined with a two-layer k-ε-turbulence model by the present authors. The discrete element model will be formulated in a new way suitable for randomly rough topographies. Part I of the paper will provide detailed model formulations as well as a description of the database used for developing the new transition onset correlation. Part II contains a comprehensive validation of the two models, using a variety of test cases with transitional and fully turbulent boundary layers. The validation focuses on heat transfer calculations on both, the suction and the pressure side of modern turbine airfoils. Test cases include extensive experimental investigations on a high-pressure turbine vane with varying surface roughness and turbulence intensity, recently published by the current authors as well as new experimental data from a low-pressure turbine vane. In the majority of cases, the predictions from both models are in good agreement with the experimental data.

Extended Models for Transitional Rough Wall Boundary Layers With Heat Transfer—Part II: Model Validation and Benchmarking

2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Stripf ◽  
A. Schulz ◽  
H.-J. Bauer ◽  
S. Wittig
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Experimental Data ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Turbulence Intensity ◽  
Discrete Element ◽  
Rough Wall ◽  
Test Cases ◽  
Wall Boundary ◽  
Turbine Vane

Two extended models for the calculation of rough wall transitional boundary layers with heat transfer are presented. Both models comprise a new transition onset correlation, which accounts for the effects of roughness height and density, turbulence intensity, and wall curvature. In the transition region, an intermittency equation suitable for rough wall boundary layers is used to blend between the laminar and fully turbulent states. Finally, two different submodels for the fully turbulent boundary layer complete the two models. In the first model, termed KS-TLK-T in this paper, a sand roughness approach from (Durbin, et al., 2001, “Rough Wall Modification of Two-Layer k-ε ,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 123, pp. 16–21), which builds on a two-layer k-ε-turbulence model, is used for this purpose. The second model, the so-called DEM-TLV-T model, makes use of the discrete-element roughness approach, which was recently combined with a two-layer k-ε-turbulence model by the present authors. The discrete-element model will be formulated in a new way suitable for randomly rough topographies. Part I of this paper will provide detailed model formulations as well as a description of the database used for developing the new transition onset correlation. Part II contains a comprehensive validation of the two models, using a variety of test cases with transitional and fully turbulent boundary layers. The validation focuses on heat transfer calculations on both the suction and the pressure side of modern turbine airfoils. Test cases include extensive experimental investigations on a high pressure turbine vane with varying surface roughness and turbulence intensity, recently published by the current authors, as well as new experimental data from a low pressure turbine vane. In the majority of cases, the predictions from both models are in good agreement with the experimental data.

Extended Models for Transitional Rough Wall Boundary Layers With Heat Transfer—Part I: Model Formulations

2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Stripf ◽  
A. Schulz ◽  
H.-J. Bauer ◽  
S. Wittig
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Experimental Data ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Turbulence Intensity ◽  
Discrete Element ◽  
Rough Wall ◽  
Test Cases ◽  
Wall Boundary ◽  
Turbine Vane

Two extended models for the calculation of rough wall transitional boundary layers with heat transfer are presented. Both models comprise a new transition onset correlation, which accounts for the effects of roughness height and density, turbulence intensity, and wall curvature. In the transition region, an intermittency equation suitable for rough wall boundary layers is used to blend between the laminar and fully turbulent states. Finally, two different submodels for the fully turbulent boundary layer complete the two models. In the first model, termed KS-TLK-T in this paper, a sand roughness approach from Durbin et al. (2001, “Rough Wall Modification of Two Layer k-ε ,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 123, pp. 16–21), which builds upon a two-layer k-ε-turbulence model, is used for this purpose. The second model, the so-called DEM-TLV-T model, makes use of the discrete-element roughness approach, which was recently combined with a two-layer k-ε-turbulence model by the present authors. The discrete-element model will be formulated in a new way, suitable for randomly rough topographies. Part I of the paper will provide detailed model formulations as well as a description of the database used for developing the new transition onset correlation. Part II contains a comprehensive validation of the two models, using a variety of test cases with transitional and fully turbulent boundary layers. The validation focuses on heat transfer calculations on both the suction and the pressure side of modern turbine airfoils. Test cases include extensive experimental investigations on a high-pressure turbine vane with varying surface roughness and turbulence intensity, recently published by the current authors as well as new experimental data from a low-pressure turbine vane. In the majority of cases, the predictions from both models are in good agreement with the experimental data.

scholarly journals Darcy-Brinkman free convection about a wedge and a cone subjected to a mixed thermal boundary condition

1992 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 789-794 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Ramanaiah ◽  
V. Kumaran
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Boundary Condition ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Porous Medium ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Free Convection ◽  
Transformation Group ◽  
Darcy Number ◽  
Thermal Boundary Condition ◽  
High Porosity

The Darcy-Brinkman free convection near a wedge and a cone in a porous medium with high porosity has been considered. The surfaces are subjected to a mixed thermal boundary condition characterized by a parameterm;m=0,1,∞correspond to the cases of prescribed temperature, prescribed heat flux and prescribed heat transfer coefficient respectively. It is shown that the solutions for differentmare dependent and a transformation group has been found, through which one can get solution for anymprovided solution for a particular value ofmis known. The effects of Darcy number on skin friction and rate of heat transfer are analyzed.

Applicability of Taylor’s hypothesis in rough- and smooth-wall boundary layers

2016 ◽  
Vol 812 ◽  
pp. 398-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. T. Squire ◽  
N. Hutchins ◽  
C. Morrill-Winter ◽  
M. P. Schultz ◽  
J. C. Klewicki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Outer Region ◽  
Rough Wall ◽  
Turbulent Shear ◽  
Normal Velocity ◽  
Turbulent Shear Flow ◽  
Smooth Wall ◽  
Wall Boundary ◽  
Taylor’S Hypothesis ◽  
Velocity Spectra

The spatial structure of smooth- and rough-wall boundary layers is examined spectrally at approximately matched friction Reynolds number ($\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}^{+}\approx 12\,000$). For each wall condition, temporal and true spatial descriptions of the same flow are available from hot-wire anemometry and high-spatial-range particle image velocimetry, respectively. The results show that over the resolved flow domain, which is limited to a streamwise length of twice the boundary layer thickness, true spatial spectra of smooth-wall streamwise and wall-normal velocity fluctuations agree, to within experimental uncertainty, with those obtained from time series using Taylor’s frozen turbulence hypothesis (Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, vol. 164, 1938, pp. 476–490). The same applies for the streamwise velocity spectra on rough walls. For the wall-normal velocity spectra, however, clear differences are observed between the true spatial and temporally convected spectra. For the rough-wall spectra, a correction is derived to enable accurate prediction of wall-normal velocity length scales from measurements of their time scales, and the implications of this correction are considered. Potential violations to Taylor’s hypothesis in flows above perturbed walls may help to explain conflicting conclusions in the literature regarding the effect of near-wall modifications on outer-region flow. In this regard, all true spatial and corrected spectra presented here indicate structural similarity in the outer region of smooth- and rough-wall flows, providing evidence for Townsend’s wall-similarity hypothesis (The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, vol. 1, 1956).

An Investigation of Local Heat Transfer during Grinding Process—Effects of Porosity of Grinding Wheel

1979 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Saito ◽  
N. Nishiwaki ◽  
Y. Ito
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Boundary Condition ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Local Heat Transfer ◽  
Local Heat ◽  
Thermal Boundary Condition ◽  
Grinding Wheel ◽  
Grinding Process ◽  
Workpiece Surface

The thermal boundary condition around the workpiece surface is one of important factors to analyze the thermal deformation of a workpiece, which is in close relation to the machining, accuracy of grinding. The heat dissipation from the workpiece surface which is influenced by the flow pattern, may govern this thermal boundary condition. In consequence, it is necessary to clarify the convection heat transfer coefficient and the flow pattern of air and/or grinding fluid around surroundings of a rotating grinding wheel and of a workpiece. Here experiments were carried out in a surface grinding process to measure the flow velocity, wall pressure and local heat transfer by changing the porosity of the grinding wheel. The air blowing out from the grinding wheel which is effected by the porosity may be considered to have large influences on the local heat transfer coefficient, which is found to be neither symmetric nor uniform over the workpiece surface.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document