A construction of generalized Jacobian varieties by group extensions

1962 ◽  
Vol 147 (4) ◽  
pp. 277-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Oort
1954 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxwell Rosenlicht

2005 ◽  
Vol 203 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 252-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Philippe Monnier

1957 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 231-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisasi Morikawa

Using Frobenius automorphisms ingeniouslly, S. Lang has established an elegant theory of unramified class fields of function fields in several variables over finite fields [2]. As an application of class field theory and theory of reduction he has proved that any separable unramified abelian extension of a function field of one variable comes from a pull back of a separable ingeny of its jacobian variety [3].


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (03) ◽  
pp. 1650049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piyush Shroff ◽  
Sarah Witherspoon

We examine PBW deformations of finite group extensions of quantum symmetric algebras, in particular the quantum Drinfeld orbifold algebras defined by the first author. We give a homological interpretation, in terms of Gerstenhaber brackets, of the necessary and sufficient conditions on parameter functions to define a quantum Drinfeld orbifold algebra, thus clarifying the conditions. In case the acting group is trivial, we determine conditions under which such a PBW deformation is a generalized enveloping algebra of a color Lie algebra; our PBW deformations include these algebras as a special case.


1973 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. Hauptfleisch

If A, B, H, K are abelian group and φ: A → H and ψ: B → K are epimorphisms, then a given central group extension G of H by K is not necessarily a homomorphic image of a group extension of A by B. Take for instance A = Z(2), B = Z ⊕ Z, H = Z(2), K = V4 (Klein's fourgroup). Then the dihedral group D8 is a central extension of H by K but it is not a homomorphic image of Z ⊕ Z ⊕ Z(2), the only group extension of A by the free group B.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document