On the complete integral closure of an integral domain of Krull type

1967 ◽  
Vol 173 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe Leonard Mott
Keyword(s):  
Integral Domain ◽  
Integral Closure ◽  
Complete Integral Closure

scholarly journals On complete integral closure and Archimedean valuation domains

1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Gilmer
Keyword(s):  
Integral Domain ◽  
Integral Closure ◽  
Extension Field ◽  
Quotient Field ◽  
Valuation Domains ◽  
Complete Integral Closure

AbstractSuppose D is an integral domain with quotient field K and that L is an extension field of K. We show in Theorem 4 that if the complete integral closure of D is an intersection of Archimedean valuation domains on K, then the complete integral closure of D in L is an intersection of Archimedean valuation domains on L; this answers a question raised by Gilmer and Heinzer in 1965.

INTEGRAL AND COMPLETE INTEGRAL CLOSURES OF IDEALS IN INTEGRAL DOMAINS

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 701-710
Author(s):  
A. MIMOUNI
Keyword(s):  
Integral Domain ◽  
Integral Closure ◽  
Integral Domains ◽  
Dedekind Domains ◽  
Integrally Closed ◽  
Complete Integral Closure ◽  
Integral Closures ◽  
The Ideal

This paper studies the integral and complete integral closures of an ideal in an integral domain. By definition, the integral closure of an ideal I of a domain R is the ideal given by I′ ≔ {x ∈ R | x satisfies an equation of the form xr + a1xr-1 + ⋯ + ar = 0, where ai ∈ Ii for each i ∈ {1, …, r}}, and the complete integral closure of I is the ideal Ī ≔ {x ∈ R | there exists 0 ≠ = c ∈ R such that cxn ∈ In for all n ≥ 1}. An ideal I is said to be integrally closed or complete (respectively, completely integrally closed) if I = I′ (respectively, I = Ī). We investigate the integral and complete integral closures of ideals in many different classes of integral domains and we give a new characterization of almost Dedekind domains via the complete integral closure of ideals.

scholarly journals On the complete integral closure of an integral domain

1966 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Gilmer ◽  
William J. Heinzer
Keyword(s):  
Integral Domain ◽  
Monic Polynomial ◽  
Commutative Rings ◽  
Integral Closure ◽  
Complete Integral Closure

We consider in this paper only commutative rings with identity. When R is considered as a subring of S it will always be assumed that R and S have the same identity. If R is a subring of S an element s of S said to be integral over R if s is the root of a monic polynomial with coefficients in R. Following Krull [8], p. 102, we say s is almost integral over R provided all powers of s belong to a finite R-submodule of S. If R1 is the set of elements of S almost integral over R we say R1 is the complete integral closure of R in S.

scholarly journals Some Remarks on Complete Integral Closure

1969 ◽  
Vol 9 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 310-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Heinzer
Keyword(s):  
Positive Integer ◽  
Integral Domain ◽  
Nonzero Element ◽  
Integral Closure ◽  
Quotient Field ◽  
Integrally Closed ◽  
Complete Integral Closure

This paper continues an investigation of the complete integral closure of an integral domain which was begun in [2]. We recall that if D is an integral domain with quotient field K then an element x of K is said to be almost integral over D if there exists a nonzero element y of D such that yxn is an element of D for each positive integer n. The set D* of elements of K almost integral over D is called the complete integral closure of D and D is said to be completely integrally closed if D* = D.

Ordinary Singularities with Decreasing Hilbert Function

1982 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie G. Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Maximal Ideal ◽  
Integral Domain ◽  
Hilbert Function ◽  
Integral Closure ◽  
Minimal Prime Ideal ◽  
Quotient Field ◽  
Graded Ring ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Minimal Prime ◽  
Dimension One

Let A be the co-ordinate ring of a reduced curve over a field k. This means that A is an algebra of finite type over k, A has no nilpotent elements, and that if P is a minimal prime ideal of A, then A/P is an integral domain of Krull dimension one. Let M be a maximal ideal of A. Then G(A) (the graded ring of A relative to M) is defined to be . We get the same graded ring if we first localize at M, and then form the graded ring of AM relative to the maximal ideal MAM. That isLet Ā be the integral closure of A. If P1, P2, …, Ps are the minimal primes of A thenwhere A/Pi is a domain and is the integral closure of A/Pi in its quotient field.

FINITELY VALUATIVE DOMAINS

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (06) ◽  
pp. 1250112 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAUL-JEAN CAHEN ◽  
DAVID E. DOBBS ◽  
THOMAS G. LUCAS
Keyword(s):  
Nonnegative Integer ◽  
Integral Domain ◽  
Nonzero Element ◽  
Integral Closure ◽  
Quotient Field ◽  
Prüfer Domain ◽  
Maximal Ideals ◽  
Saturated Chain

For a pair of rings S ⊆ T and a nonnegative integer n, an element t ∈ T\S is said to be within n steps of S if there is a saturated chain of rings S = S0 ⊊ S1 ⊊ ⋯ ⊊ Sm = S[t] with length m ≤ n. An integral domain R is said to be n-valuative (respectively, finitely valuative) if for each nonzero element u in its quotient field, at least one of u and u-1 is within n (respectively, finitely many) steps of R. The integral closure of a finitely valuative domain is a Prüfer domain. Moreover, an n-valuative domain has at most 2n + 1 maximal ideals; and an n-valuative domain with 2n + 1 maximal ideals must be a Prüfer domain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document