A visual interactive multicriteria decision analysis model for FMS design

1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 848-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Borenstein
Keyword(s):  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Analysis ◽  
Decision Analysis Model ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Multicriteria Decision

Searching for Consensus Through Multicriteria Decision Analysis

1990 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 430-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Le Gales ◽  
Jean-Paul Moatti
Keyword(s):  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Analysis ◽  
Decision Analysis Model ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Multicriteria Decision ◽  
Regional Center ◽  
Ethnic Populations ◽  
Screening Strategies ◽  
Ethical Acceptability ◽  
Systematic Strategy

AbstractUntil now, no systematic strategy for the prevention of major hemoglobinopathies has been implemented in southeastern France, in spite of frequencies of β-thalassemia trait and HbS trait as high as 2·5–8% in some ethnic populations. The purpose of the study was to help a group of experts, brought together by the Regional Center for Disease Control, to reach a consensus about screening for carriers of heterozygote hemoglobinopathies. A multicriteria decision-analysis model was used to take into account not only the costs and effectiveness of potential screening strategies, but also five other qualitative criteria: technical and practical feasibilities, ethical acceptability, information follow-up in time, and global impact on health education. Conclusions differ significatively from those of a pure costeffectiveness analysis, but a multicriteria approach seems best suited to medical experts' preferences.

EVALUATION OF ECO-EFFICIENCY BY MULTICRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS. CASE STUDY OF ECO-INNOVATED AND ECO-DESIGNED PRODUCTS FROM RECYCLABLE WASTE

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 1791-1804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Gavrilescu ◽  
Elena-Diana Comanita ◽  
Petronela Cozma ◽  
Isabela Maria Simion ◽  
Mihaela Rosca
Keyword(s):  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Analysis ◽  
Multicriteria Decision

The Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis Methods in Health Care: A Literature Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 0272989X2110190
Author(s):  
Ilyas Khan ◽  
Liliane Pintelon ◽  
Harry Martin
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Hybrid Methods ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Analysis ◽  
Multicriteria Decision ◽  
Health Care Decision ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Care Decision

Objectives The main objectives of this article are 2-fold. First, we explore the application of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods in different areas of health care, particularly the adoption of various MCDA methods across health care decision making problems. Second, we report on the publication trends on the application of MCDA methods in health care. Method PubMed was searched for literature from 1960 to 2019 in the English language. A wide range of keywords was used to retrieve relevant studies. The literature search was performed in September 2019. Articles were included only if they have reported an MCDA case in health care. Results and Conclusion The search yielded 8,318 abstracts, of which 158 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were considered for further analysis. Hybrid methods are the most widely used methods in health care decision making problems. When it comes to single methods, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is the most widely used method followed by TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution), multiattribute utility theory, goal programming, EVIDEM (evidence and value: impact on decision making), evidential reasoning, discrete choice experiment, and so on. Interestingly, the usage of hybrid methods has been high in recent years. AHP is most widely applied in screening and diagnosing and followed by treatment, medical devices, resource allocation, and so on. Furthermore, treatment, screening and diagnosing, medical devices, and drug development and assessment got more attention in the MCDA context. It is indicated that the application of MCDA methods to health care decision making problem is determined by the nature and complexity of the health care problem. However, guidelines and tools exist that assist in the selection of an MCDA method.

Cost Benefit and Utility Decision Analysis of Turbinoplasty with Adenotonsillectomy for Pediatric Sleep-Disordered Breathing

2019 ◽  
Vol 161 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace Baik ◽  
Scott E. Brietzke
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Sleep Disordered Breathing ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Decision Analysis Model ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Baseline Model ◽  
Turbinate Hypertrophy ◽  
Disordered Breathing

Objectives Use decision analysis techniques to assess the potential utility gains/losses and costs of adding bilateral inferior turbinoplasty to tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy (T/A) for the treatment of obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (oSDB) in children. Use sensitivity analysis to explore the key variables in the scenario. Study Design Cost-utility decision analysis model. Setting Hypothetical cohort. Subjects and Methods Computer software (TreeAge Software, Williamstown, Massachusetts) was used to construct a decision analysis model. The model included the possibility of postoperative complications and persistent oSDB after surgery. Baseline clinical and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) parameters were estimated using published data. Cost data were estimated from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid 2018 databases ( www.cms.gov ). Sensitivity analyses were completed to assess for key model parameters. Results The utility analysis of the baseline model favored the addition of turbinoplasty (0.8890 vs 0.8875 overall utility) assuming turbinate hypertrophy was present. Sensitivity analysis indicated the treatment success increase (%) provided by concurrent turbinoplasty was the key parameter in the model. A treatment success increase of 3% of turbinoplasty was the threshold where concurrent turbinoplasty was favored over T/A alone. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $27,333/QALY for the baseline model was favorable to the willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 to $100,000/QALY for industrialized nations. Conclusions The addition of turbinoplasty for children with turbinate hypertrophy to T/A for the treatment of pediatric oSDB is beneficial from both a utility and cost-benefit analysis standpoint even if the benefits of turbinoplasty are relatively modest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document