scholarly journals Three-hadron form factor via quark-triangle loop

1993 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
W -Y. P. Hwang ◽  
A. N. Mitra
1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (28) ◽  
pp. 2317-2323 ◽  
Author(s):  
O.V. SELYUGIN

The method of calculating the Coulomb phase in the second Born order with allowance for the hadron form factor is presented. The phase of the modified Coulomb amplitude can be calculated exactly by taking account of the form factor of hadrons. The phase with the dipole form factor is estimated; as a result, the behavior of the total phase of the Coulomb-hadron interference changes as a function of the transfer momentum.


1992 ◽  
Vol 285 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Cho ◽  
Benjamín Grinstein

Author(s):  
T. Geipel ◽  
W. Mader ◽  
P. Pirouz

Temperature affects both elastic and inelastic scattering of electrons in a crystal. The Debye-Waller factor, B, describes the influence of temperature on the elastic scattering of electrons, whereas the imaginary part of the (complex) atomic form factor, fc = fr + ifi, describes the influence of temperature on the inelastic scattering of electrons (i.e. absorption). In HRTEM simulations, two possible ways to include absorption are: (i) an approximate method in which absorption is described by a phenomenological constant, μ, i.e. fi; - μfr, with the real part of the atomic form factor, fr, obtained from Hartree-Fock calculations, (ii) a more accurate method in which the absorptive components, fi of the atomic form factor are explicitly calculated. In this contribution, the inclusion of both the Debye-Waller factor and absorption on HRTEM images of a (Oll)-oriented GaAs crystal are presented (using the EMS software.Fig. 1 shows the the amplitudes and phases of the dominant 111 beams as a function of the specimen thickness, t, for the cases when μ = 0 (i.e. no absorption, solid line) and μ = 0.1 (with absorption, dashed line).


1982 ◽  
Vol 43 (C7) ◽  
pp. C7-273-C7-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Burlet ◽  
J. X. Boucherle ◽  
J. Rossat-Mignod ◽  
J. W. Cable ◽  
W. C. Koehler ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Vol 43 (C7) ◽  
pp. C7-263-C7-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. X. Boucherle ◽  
D. Ravot ◽  
J. Schweizer
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Vol 43 (C7) ◽  
pp. C7-253-C7-256
Author(s):  
H. Fuess ◽  
R. Müller ◽  
D. Schwabe ◽  
F. Tasset

Author(s):  
Kendall Scott Wills ◽  
Omar Diaz de Leon ◽  
Kartik Ramanujachar ◽  
Charles P. Todd

Abstract In the current generations of devices the die and its package are closely integrated to achieve desired performance and form factor. As a result, localization of continuity failures to either the die or the package is a challenging step in failure analysis of such devices. Time Domain Reflectometry [1] (TDR) is used to localize continuity failures. However the accuracy of measurement with TDR is inadequate for effective localization of the failsite. Additionally, this technique does not provide direct 3-Dimenstional information about the location of the defect. Super-conducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) Microscope is useful in localizing shorts in packages [2]. SQUID microscope can localize defects to within 5um in the X and Y directions and 35um in the Z direction. This accuracy is valuable in precise localization of the failsite within the die, package or the interfacial region in flipchip assemblies.


2000 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
A. N. Khoperskiı̆
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document