User modeling for flexible inference control and its relevance to decision-making in economics and management

1993 ◽  
Vol 6 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 163-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengxin Chen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
User Modeling ◽  
Inference Control ◽  
Flexible Inference

scholarly journals User Modeling from Review Browsing History for Personal Values-Based Recommendation

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 326-334
Author(s):  
Yasufumi Takama ◽  
◽  
Suzuto Shimizu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Recommender Systems ◽  
User Modeling ◽  
Personal Values ◽  
User Model ◽  
User Feedback ◽  
Modeling Method ◽  
History Of

This paper proposes a personal values-based user modeling method from user’s browsing history of reviews. Personal values-based user modeling and its application to recommender systems have been studied. This approach models users’ personal values as the effect of item’s attributes on their decision making. While existing method obtains a user model from reviews posted by a user, this paper proposes to obtain it from reviews a user consulted for his/her decision making. Methods for determining reviews to present for obtaining user feedback, as well as for selecting items to recommend are proposed, of which effectiveness are shown with user experiments.

Personal Values-Based Item Modeling and its Application to Recommendation with Explanation

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 867-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasufumi Takama ◽  
◽  
Takayuki Yamaguchi ◽  
Shunichi Hattori ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Recommender Systems ◽  
Recommender System ◽  
User Modeling ◽  
Personal Values ◽  
Long Tail ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Personal Value ◽  
Recommendation Accuracy ◽  
User Experiment

This paper proposes a personal-value based item modeling, which is used for calculating predicted ratings and for explaining recommendation. Personal value is one of factors affecting our decision making, and its application to recommender systems has been studied recently. This paper extends existing personal values-based user modeling to item modeling, which estimates characteristics of reviewers who like / dislike target items. A method for calculating predicted ratings based on obtained personal values-based item models is also proposed. Furthermore, this paper focuses on explanation of recommendation as well, which is one of challenges in the recent study of recommender systems. Improvements of user’s satisfactions for recommender systems by showing process of recommendation gets to be important in addition to precision of recommendation. A recommender system is developed based on the proposed method, of which effectiveness is evaluated by a user experiment, in which the target items are movies. Experimental results showed the effectiveness of the proposed method including recommendation accuracy and an explanation of recommendation. It is also shown that the proposed recommender system has the potential to recommend long-tail items.

WEB SERVICES USER MODEL SERVER PERFORMING DECISION MAKING

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (02) ◽  
pp. 245-264
Author(s):  
KATERINA KABASSI ◽  
MARIA VIRVOU ◽  
GEORGE A. TSIHRINTZIS
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Web Services ◽  
Web Service ◽  
User Modeling ◽  
User Model ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
File Manager ◽  
Intelligent Assistance ◽  
E Mail ◽  
The Web

This paper presents a user model server based on Web Services. User model servers are very important because they allow reusability of user modeling reasoning mechanisms which are typically very complex and difficult to construct from scratch. In this paper we show how the potential of interoperability, reusability and component sharing offered by the technology of Web Services have been exploited in the design of a user model server that performs decision making. The reasoning of the user modeling is based on a multi-criteria decision making theory and has been implemented as a Web Service to provide intelligent assistance to users over the Web. Reusability has been shown through the successful application of the user model server into two different applications: an e-mail and a file manager application.

Discarding optimality: Throwing out the baby with the bathwater?

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Simen ◽  
Fuat Balcı
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Reward Rate ◽  
Perceptual Decision ◽  
Standard Observer ◽  
Rate Maximization ◽  
Reward Rate Maximization ◽  
Descriptive Standard ◽  
Observer Model

AbstractRahnev & Denison (R&D) argue against normative theories and in favor of a more descriptive “standard observer model” of perceptual decision making. We agree with the authors in many respects, but we argue that optimality (specifically, reward-rate maximization) has proved demonstrably useful as a hypothesis, contrary to the authors’ claims.

LPCD framework: Analytical tool or psychological model?

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Danks
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Tool ◽  
Mathematical Framework ◽  
Bayesian Decision ◽  
Perceptual Decision Making ◽  
Psychological Model ◽  
Psychological Reality ◽  
Psychological Theories ◽  
Target Article ◽  
Bayesian Decision Making

AbstractThe target article uses a mathematical framework derived from Bayesian decision making to demonstrate suboptimal decision making but then attributes psychological reality to the framework components. Rahnev & Denison's (R&D) positive proposal thus risks ignoring plausible psychological theories that could implement complex perceptual decision making. We must be careful not to slide from success with an analytical tool to the reality of the tool components.

Elaborating the role of reflection and individual differences in the study of folk-economic beliefs

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Behavioral Responses ◽  
History Of ◽  
Economic Beliefs

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.

The primacy of conscious decision making – ERRATUM

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (01) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
David R. Shanks ◽  
Ben R. Newell
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Conscious Decision

The primacy of conscious decision making – RETRACTION

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (01) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
David R. Shanks ◽  
Ben R. Newell
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Conscious Decision

Abstraction: An alternative neurocognitive account of recognition, prediction, and decision making

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie F. Reyna ◽  
David A. Broniatowski
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Software Engineering ◽  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Trace Theory ◽  
Fuzzy Trace Theory ◽  
Abstract Representations ◽  
Technical Systems

Abstract Gilead et al. offer a thoughtful and much-needed treatment of abstraction. However, it fails to build on an extensive literature on abstraction, representational diversity, neurocognition, and psychopathology that provides important constraints and alternative evidence-based conceptions. We draw on conceptions in software engineering, socio-technical systems engineering, and a neurocognitive theory with abstract representations of gist at its core, fuzzy-trace theory.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document