Boundary layer separation singularities for an upstream moving wall

1983 ◽  
Vol 49 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 241-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. L. van Dommelen ◽  
S. F. Shen
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Layer Separation ◽  
Layer Separation ◽  
Moving Wall

Numerical solution of unsteady boundary-layer separation in supersonic flow: upstream moving wall

2012 ◽  
Vol 706 ◽  
pp. 413-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Yapalparvi ◽  
L. L. Van Dommelen
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Supersonic Flow ◽  
Numerical Solutions ◽  
Stokes Equations ◽  
Pressure Rise ◽  
Boundary Layer Separation ◽  
Recirculation Region ◽  
Characteristic Time Scale ◽  
Layer Separation ◽  
Moving Wall

AbstractThis paper is an extension of work on separation from a downstream moving wall by Ruban et al. (J. Fluid. Mech., vol. 678, 2011, pp. 124–155) and is in particular concerned with the boundary-layer separation in unsteady two-dimensional laminar supersonic flow. In a frame attached to the wall, the separation is assumed to be provoked by a shock wave impinging upon the boundary layer at a point that moves downstream with a non-dimensional speed which is assumed to be of order ${\mathit{Re}}^{\ensuremath{-} 1/ 8} $ where $\mathit{Re}$ is the Reynolds number. In the coordinate system of the shock however, the wall moves upstream. The strength of the shock and its speed are allowed to vary with time on a characteristic time scale that is large compared to ${\mathit{Re}}^{\ensuremath{-} 1/ 4} $. The ‘triple-deck’ model is used to describe the interaction process. The governing equations of the interaction problem can be derived from the Navier–Stokes equations in the limit $\mathit{Re}\ensuremath{\rightarrow} \infty $. The numerical solutions are obtained using a combination of finite differences along the streamwise direction and Chebyshev collocation along the normal direction in conjunction with Newton linearization. In the present study with the wall moving upstream, the evidence is inconclusive regarding the so-called ‘Moore–Rott–Sears’ criterion being satisfied. Instead it is observed that the pressure rise from its initial value is very slow and that a recirculation region forms, the upstream part of which is wedge-shaped, as also observed in turbulent marginal separation for large values of angle of attack.

The boundary layer separation from streamlined surfaces and new ways of its prevention in diffusers

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arkady Zaryankin ◽  
Andrey Rogalev ◽  
Ivan Komarov ◽  
V. Kindra ◽  
S. Osipov
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Layer Separation ◽  
Layer Separation

scholarly journals Leading Edge Blowing to Mimic and Enhance the Serration Effects for Aerofoil

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 2593
Author(s):  
Yasir Al-Okbi ◽  
Tze Pei Chong ◽  
Oksana Stalnov
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Angle Of Attack ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Boundary Layer Separation ◽  
Shear Instability ◽  
Vortical Flow ◽  
High Angle ◽  
High Angle Of Attack ◽  
Layer Separation ◽  
Aerodynamic Performances

Leading edge serration is now a well-established and effective passive control device for the reduction of turbulence–leading edge interaction noise, and for the suppression of boundary layer separation at high angle of attack. It is envisaged that leading edge blowing could produce the same mechanisms as those produced by a serrated leading edge to enhance the aeroacoustics and aerodynamic performances of aerofoil. Aeroacoustically, injection of mass airflow from the leading edge (against the incoming turbulent flow) can be an effective mechanism to decrease the turbulence intensity, and/or alter the stagnation point. According to classical theory on the aerofoil leading edge noise, there is a potential for the leading edge blowing to reduce the level of turbulence–leading edge interaction noise radiation. Aerodynamically, after the mixing between the injected air and the incoming flow, a shear instability is likely to be triggered owing to the different flow directions. The resulting vortical flow will then propagate along the main flow direction across the aerofoil surface. These vortical flows generated indirectly owing to the leading edge blowing could also be effective to mitigate boundary layer separation at high angle of attack. The objectives of this paper are to validate these hypotheses, and combine the serration and blowing together on the leading edge to harvest further improvement on the aeroacoustics and aerodynamic performances. Results presented in this paper strongly indicate that leading edge blowing, which is an active flow control method, can indeed mimic and even enhance the bio-inspired leading edge serration effectively.

On turbulent boundary-layer separation

1968 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Sandborn ◽  
C. Y. Liu
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Analytical Study ◽  
Boundary Layer Separation ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Laminar Separation ◽  
Layer Separation ◽  
Turbulent Separation ◽  
Separation Model

An experimental and analytical study of the separation of a turbulent boundary layer is reported. The turbulent boundary-layer separation model proposed by Sandborn & Kline (1961) is demonstrated to predict the experimental results. Two distinct turbulent separation regions, an intermittent and a steady separation, with correspondingly different velocity distributions are confirmed. The true zero wall shear stress turbulent separation point is determined by electronic means. The associated mean velocity profile is shown to belong to the same family of profiles as found for laminar separation. The velocity distribution at the point of reattachment of a turbulent boundary layer behind a step is also shown to belong to the laminar separation family.Prediction of the location of steady turbulent boundary-layer separation is made using the technique employed by Stratford (1959) for intermittent separation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document