A groupoid of the ternary ring of a projective plane

1991 ◽  
Vol 42 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 3-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. W. Al-Dhahir ◽  
W. Benz ◽  
K. Ghalieh
1976 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. E. Dekker

The main purpose of this paper is to show how partial recursive functions and isols can be used to generalize the following three well-known theorems of combinatorial theory.(I) For every finite projective plane Π there is a unique number n such that Π has exactly n2 + n + 1 points and exactly n2 + n + 1 lines.(II) Every finite projective plane of order n can be coordinatized by a finite planar ternary ring of order n. Conversely, every finite planar ternary ring of order n coordinatizes a finite projective plane of order n.(III) There exists a finite projective plane of order n if and only if there exist n − 1 mutually orthogonal Latin squares of order n.


1975 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-36
Author(s):  
Frederick W. Stevenson

This paper introduces two relations both weaker than isotopism which may hold between planar ternary rings. We will concentrate on the geometric consequences rather than the algebraic properties of these relations. It is well-known that every projective plane can be coordinatized by a planar ternary ring and every planar ternary ring coordinatizes a projective plane. If two planar ternary rings are isomorphic then their associated projective planes are isomorphic; however, the converse is not true. In fact, an algebraic bond which necessarily holds between the coordinatizing planar ternary rings of isomorphic projective planes has not been found. Such a bond must, of course, be weaker than isomorphism; furthermore, it must be weaker than isotopism. Here we show that it is even weaker than the two new relations introduced.This is significant because the weaker of our relations is, in a sense, the weakest possible algebraic relation which can hold between planar ternary rings which coordinatize isomorphic projective planes.


1998 ◽  
Vol 61 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 17-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Benz ◽  
Khuloud Ghalieh

1974 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 536-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. W. Al-Dhahir ◽  
M. S. Abdul-Elah

1972 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-111
Author(s):  
Michael J. Kallaher

A projective plane has characteristic three if in every ternary ring coordinatizing it all elements ≠ 0 of the additive loop have order 3. We show that if a finite plane of characteristic three is coordinatized by a near-field, then the plane is desarguesian.


1968 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 1459-1464
Author(s):  
Michael J. Kallaher

By a Reidemeister plane we mean a projective plane having the property that every ternary ring coordinatizing it has associative addition. Finite Reidemeister planes have been investigated by Gleason (2), Liineburg (6), and Kegel and Luneburg (4). In the first paper, Gleason proved that if the order of the plane is a prime power, then it is Desarguesian. Luneburg showed that this is still true if the order is not 60. In the third paper, this last restriction is removed. For infinite planes, the only result is the following theorem due to Pickert (7, p. 301).


Author(s):  
Hanjo Berressem

Providing a comprehensive reading of Deleuzian philosophy, Gilles Deleuze’s Luminous Philosophy argues that this philosophy’s most consistent conceptual spine and figure of thought is its inherent luminism. When Deleuze notes in Cinema 1 that ‘the plane of immanence is entirely made up of light’, he ties this philosophical luminism directly to the notion of the complementarity of the photon in its aspects of both particle and wave. Engaging, in chronological order, the whole body and range of Deleuze’s and Deleuze and Guattari’s writing, the book traces the ‘line of light’ that runs through Deleuze’s work, and it considers the implications of Deleuze’s luminism for the fields of literary studies, historical studies, the visual arts and cinema studies. It contours Deleuze’s luminism both against recent studies that promote a ‘dark Deleuze’ and against the prevalent view that Deleuzian philosophy is a philosophy of difference. Instead, it argues, it is a philosophy of the complementarity of difference and diversity, considered as two reciprocally determining fields that are, in Deleuze’s view, formally distinct but ontologically one. The book, which is the companion volume toFélix Guattari’s Schizoanalytic Ecology, argues that the ‘real projective plane’ is the ‘surface of thought’ of Deleuze’s philosophical luminism.


2018 ◽  
Vol 341 (8) ◽  
pp. 2121-2130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gábor Korchmáros ◽  
Gábor P. Nagy
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document